پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 851 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,206 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 16,270,309 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 10,760,651 |
Mentoring Characteristics in Doctoral Education: Perspectives of Doctoral Students and Supervisors | ||
| Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies | ||
| دوره 18، شماره 1، مهر 2026، صفحه 1-18 اصل مقاله (657 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/ijals.2026.54559.2586 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Saloumeh Khodabakhshi؛ Hassan Soodmand Afshar* | ||
| Department of English Language, Faculty of Humanities, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The benefits of mentoring relationships between postgraduate students and their supervisors have been reported in the literature. However, despite research on mentors’ characteristics, there is a notable lack of ELT studies that give voice to both mentees and mentors. Few studies have explored the features of doctoral mentoring from both perspectives. For this reason, 55 ELT doctoral students and 18 doctoral supervisors responded to an open-ended question as part of a large-scale project. In addition, nine doctoral students and five supervisors volunteered for a follow-up semi-structured interview. Conventional content analysis of the responses to the open-ended question and the interviews demonstrated that, in the opinions of doctoral students and supervisors, a doctoral mentor should be supportive, knowledgeable, humanitarian, and available. Using directed content analysis, the identified mentoring characteristics were categorized into psychosocial, personal, and professional attributes. According to the findings, both doctoral students and supervisors prioritize psychosocial attributes, followed by personal and professional attributes, because the stressful conditions of doctoral education demand social and emotional support from doctoral mentors. This study also addresses implications for doctoral education, including how supervisors and their graduate students can effectively fulfill their respective roles. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| doctoral students؛ doctoral supervisors؛ doctoral education؛ mentors؛ mentees؛ mentoring characteristics | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Al Makhamreh, M., & Stockley, D. (2020). Mentorship and well-being: Examining doctoral students’ lived experiences in doctoral supervision context. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 9(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-02-2019-0013
Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation?. Qualitative health research, 26(13), 1802-1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870
Buus, N., Ong, B., Einboden, R., Juel, A., & Perron, A. (2025). Constructing research quality: On the performativity of the COREQ checklist. Qualitative Health Research, https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251323225
Carpenter, S., Makhadmeh, N., & Thornton, L. J. (2015). Mentorship on the doctoral level: An examination of communication faculty mentors’ traits and functions. Communication Education, 64(3), 366-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1041997
Carpintero, S. (2015). Qualities that mentors in the university setting should have. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 255-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.132
Chamely-Wiik, D., Cooney, B. T., & DeDonno, M. A. (2020). Who mentors undergraduate student researchers? An analysis of faculty involvement at a four-year university. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 28(1), 78-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2020.1737784
Creswell, J.W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. Cruz, J., Goff, M. H., & Marsh, J. P. (2020). Building the mentoring relationship: humanism and the importance of storytelling between mentor and mentee. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 28(2), 104-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2020.1749344
Ghaseminangi, S., Jokar, F., & Yousefy, A. (2026). Navigating supervisory and structural challenges in phD education: a qualitative study of Iranian phD candidates’ perspectives. BMC Medical Education, 26(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-08411-0
Hall, K. M., Draper, R. J., Smith, L. K., & Bullough Jr, R. V. (2008). More than a place to teach: Exploring the perceptions of the roles and responsibilities of mentor teachers. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 16(3), 328-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260802231708
Heeralal, P. J. H. (2014). Student teachers’ perspectives of qualities of good mentor teachers. The Anthropologist, 17(1), 243-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2014.11891434
Hoang, N. H. (2024). Exploring the multifaceted characteristics of pre-service EFL teachers during practicum: A complexity theory perspective in Vietnam. Applied Research on English Language, 13(4), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2024.141547.2296
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
Kim, J. H. (2015). Understanding narrative inquiry: The crafting and analysis of stories as research. Sage publications.
Kim, S. E. (2014). The mentor-protégé affinity on mentoring outcomes: the mediating effect of developmental networking. International Review of Public Administration, 19(1), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2014.887368
Kordestani Moghaddam, A., Esmaillzadeh, A., & Azadbakht, L. (2019). Postgraduate Research Mentorship Program: An approach to improve the quality of postgraduate research supervision and mentorship in Iranian students. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 8(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_37_19
Kumar, S., & Johnson, M. (2017). Mentoring doctoral students online: Mentor strategies and challenges. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 25(2), 202-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2017.1326693
Lammert, C., DeWalt, L. M., & Wetzel, M. M. (2020). “Becoming” a mentor between reflective and evaluative discourses: A case study of identity development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 96, 103179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103179
Levecque, K., Anseel, F., De Beuckelaer, A., Van der Heyden, J., & Gisle, L. (2017). Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students. Research policy, 46(4), 868-879. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008
Lunsford, L. (2012). Doctoral advising or mentoring? Effects on student outcomes. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 20(2), 251-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2012.678974
Lyons, W., Scroggins, D., & Rule, P. B. (1990). The mentor in graduate education. Studies in Higher Education, 15(3), 277-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079012331377400
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, M. J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE Publications. https://www.metodos.work/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Qualitative-Data-Analysis.pdf
Nguyen, H. T. M. (2017). Models of mentoring in language teacher education. Springer.
Palmer, R. J., Hunt, A. N., Neal, M., & Wuetherick, B. (2015). Mentoring, undergraduate research, and identity development: A conceptual review and research agenda. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 23(5), 411-426. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2015.1126165
Ragins, B. R. (2011). Relational mentoring: A positive approach to mentoring at work. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734610.013.0039
Roberts, L., & Ferro-Almeida, S. C. (2019). Is trustworthiness important in a doctoral mentor? Toward a theory of tough love mentoring. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 613. https://doi.org/10.28945/4419
Sheikhi, M., Fallahi-Khoshknab, M., & Rahgozar, M. (2019). The Effect of integration of Mentorshiping and Peer Education methods on the academic Performance and academic Satisfaction in Nursing PhD Students. Journal of Nursing Education (JNE), 7(5), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.21859/JNE-07058
Simpson, T., Hastings, W., & Hill, B. (2007). ‘I knew that she was watching me’: The professional benefits of mentoring. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(5), 481-498. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600701561695
Terry, T., & Ghosh, R. (2015). Mentoring from different social spheres: How can multiple mentors help in doctoral student success in Ed. D programs?. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 23(3), 187-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2015.1072396
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349-357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
Tuma, T. T., Adams, J. D., Hultquist, B. C., & Dolan, E. L. (2021). The dark side of development: A systems characterization of the negative mentoring experiences of doctoral students. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(2), ar16. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-10-0231
Vance, E. A., LaLonde, D. E., & Zhang, L. (2017). The big tent for statistics: Mentoring required. The American Statistician, 71(1), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1247016
Zare, J., Aqajani Delavar, K., & Derakhshan, A. (2023). The impact of altruism on the emotions and English summary writing skills of L2 learners: An intervention study in light of positive psychology. Language Teaching Research, 1–22,
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 42 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 10 |
||