| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 850 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,200 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 16,236,355 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 10,732,285 |
Stochastic Koopman Operator-Based Adaptive Fuzzy Control for Nonlinear Systems under Unmodeled Dynamics | ||
| Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems | ||
| دوره 23، شماره 4، مهر و آبان 2026، صفحه 121-143 اصل مقاله (4.18 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/ijfs.2026.52890.9350 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohammad Ali Labbaf Khaniki1؛ Elahe Moradi* 2 | ||
| 1Faculty of Electrical Engineering, K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Electrical Engineering, YI.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This paper introduces a novel stochastic Koopman-based adaptive fuzzy control framework that combines Koopman operator theory with Takagi-Sugeno-Kang (TSK) fuzzy logic to effectively manage nonlinear systems under unmodeled dynamics and diverse stochastic disturbances. The core innovation lies in the concurrent online learning of sparse Koopman observables and the fuzzy controller using deep dictionary learning, replacing static feature sets to significantly enhance adaptability. A robust Lyapunov-based stability analysis in the Koopman observable space, supported by linear matrix inequality criteria, guarantees reliable performance across Gaussian and non-Gaussian noise conditions. Simulation results on benchmark systems, including a 4D hyperchaotic system and an inverted pendulum, demonstrate superior tracking accuracy, disturbance rejection, and computational efficiency compared to model predictive control (MPC), Nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC), and classical TSK fuzzy controllers, with the lowest IAE (1.4933, 3.2627) and ISE (2.3226, 5.0745) metrics. The method’s balance of interpretability and data-driven modeling makes it ideal for real-time control of complex, uncertain systems. While offering strong theoretical foundations and addressing critical gaps in robustness and scalability, further empirical validation and enhanced visual representations of the architecture could strengthen its impact. This work advances adaptive fuzzy control and data-driven modeling, with significant potential for applications in robotics, smart infrastructure, and other safety-critical domains. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Stochastic Koopman؛ Adaptive Fuzzy Control؛ Deep Dictionary Learning؛ Robustness؛ Nonlinear Systems | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] R. A. Aliev, S. R. Abizada, R. Abiyev, Type-3 fuzzy system for dynamic system control, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 21(3) (2024), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.22111/IJFS.2024.47267.8330 [2] N. P. Bhatta, S. A. Majmaie, F. Amsaad, Feature analysis and model evaluation for classification of hardware Trojans, in 2024 IEEE Physical Assurance and Inspection of Electronics (PAINE), (2024), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/PAINE62042.2024.10792769. [3] A. Birashk, J. K. Kordestani, M. R. Meybodi, Cellular teaching-learning-based optimization approach for dynamic multi-objective problems, Knowledge-Based Systems, 141 (2018), 148-177. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.knosys.2017.11.016 [4] D. Bruder, D. Bombara, R. J. Wood, A Koopman-based residual modeling approach for the control of a soft robot arm, The International Journal of Robotics Research, 44(3) (2025), 388-406. https: //doi.org/10.1177/02783649241272114 [5] Z. Chen, L. Cen, X. Chen, Y. Xie, W. Gui, Data-driven modeling with polytopic uncertainty and nonlinear robust model predictive control design using Koopman operator, International Journal of Robust Nonlinear Control, 35(2) (2026), 602-628. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.70140 [6] P. Cui, C. Gao, R. An, Fault-observer-based iterative learning model predictive controller for trajectory tracking of hypersonic vehicles, Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 36(3) (2025), 803-813. https://doi.org/10.23919/JSEE.2025.000033 [7] R. Debnath, D. Kumar, G. S. Gupta, S. R. Samantaray, E. F. El-Saadany, A unified novel Koopmanbased model predictive control scheme to achieve seamless stabilization of nonlinear dynamic transitions in inverter-based stochastic microgrid clusters, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 15(6) (2024), 5441-5458. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2024.3402315 [8] N. M. Dehkordi, V. Nekoukar, Adaptive distributed stochastic deep reinforcement learning control for voltage and frequency restoration in islanded AC microgrids with communication noise and delay, Scientific Reports, 15(1) (2025), 27315. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13010-6 [9] D. Gadginmath, V. Krishnan, F. Pasqualetti, Data-driven feedback linearization using the Koopman generator, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 69(12) (2024), 8844-8851, https://doi.org/10. 1109/TAC.2024.3417188 [10] N. J. Gordon, D. J. Salmond, A. F. M. Smith, Novel approach to nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian state estimation, in IEE Proceedings F (Radar and Signal Processing), 140(2) (1993), 107-113. https: //doi.org/10.1049/ip-f-2.1993.0015 [11] M. Han, X. Yin, Deep neural Koopman operator-based economic model predictive control of shipboard carbon capture system, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 33(6) (2025), 2064-2079. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2025.3569415 [12] M. Y. Heravi, A. Y. Demeke, I. S. Dola, Y. Jang, I. Jeong, C. Le, Vehicle intrusion detection in highway work zones using inertial sensors and lightweight deep learning, Automation in Construction, 176 (2025), 106291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106291 [13] S. T. Hesarkuchak, A. Boker, V. Reddy, L. Mili, H. Eldardiry, Learning-based Pareto optimal control of large-scale systems with unknown slow dynamics, IEEE Control Systems Letters, 8 (2024), 838-843. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCSYS.2024.3404412 [14] H. K. Khalil, J. W. Grizzle, Nonlinear systems, 3, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002.
[15] M. A. L. Khaniki, E. Moradi, Delay-scheduled adaptive observer control strategy for nonlinear systems with time-varying delays, IET Control Theory and Applications, 20(1) (2026), e70126. https://doi. org/10.1049/cth2.70126 [16] A. M. Khass, A. Cosse, V. Pandey, N. Motee, Conflict-aware active perception and control in 3D Gaussian splatting fields via control barrier functions, arXiv preprint, arXiv:2605.20566, (2026). https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.20566 [17] A. M. Khass, G. Liu, V. Pandey, W. Jiang, B. Lei, K. Daniilidis, N. Motee, Active next-best-view optimization for risk-averse path planning, arXiv preprint, arXiv:2510.06481, (2025). https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2510.06481 [18] B. O. Koopman, Hamiltonian systems and transformation in Hilbert space, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 17(5) (1931), 315-318. [19] M. Korda, I. Mezi´c, Linear predictors for nonlinear dynamical systems: Koopman operator meets model predictive control, Automatica, 93 (2018), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2018. 03.046 [20] A. J. Kurdila, A. L’Afflitto, J. A. Burns, Data-driven methods and adaptive control: Stochastic analysis, in Data-Driven, Nonparametric, Adaptive Control Theory, Springer, (2025), 269-315. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-031-78003-5_7 [21] M. A. Labbaf Khaniki, M. Manthouri, M. Ahmadieh Khanesar, Adaptive non-singular fast terminal sliding mode control and synchronization of a chaotic system via interval type-2 fuzzy inference system with proportionate controller, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20(6) (2023), 171-185. https://doi. org/10.22111/IJFS.2023.39658.6889 [22] J. Leventides, E. Melas, C. Poulios, A. Vardulakis, Data arising from hyperchaotic financial systems. Control through Koopman operators and EDMD, in: Proceedings of the 2022 4th International Conference on Industrial Artificial Intelligence (IAI), IEEE, (2022), 1-6, https://doi.org/10.1109/IAI55780. 2022.9976809 [23] S. Mashhadi, A. Saghezchi, V. Ghassemzadeh, Interpretable machine learning for predicting startup funding, patenting, and exits, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.09465, (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2510.09465 [24] M. Mortezaee, M. Ghovatmand, A. Nazemi, Solving variable-order fractional delay differential algebraic equations via fuzzy systems with application in delay optimal control problems, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 21(2) (2024), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.22111/IJFS.2024.43498.7646 [25] R. L. Navaei, M. Safarzadeh, S. M. J. Sobhani, Optimizing flamelet generated manifold models: A machine learning performance study, arXiv preprint, arXiv:2507.01030, (2025). https://doi.org/10. 48550/arXiv.2507.01030 [26] J. A. Paulson, A. Mesbah, S. Streif, R. Findeisen, R. D. Braatz, Fast stochastic model predictive control of high-dimensional systems, in: 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, (2014), 2802-2809. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2014.7039820 [27] J. L. Proctor, S. L. Brunton, J. N. Kutz, Dynamic mode decomposition with control, SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 15(1) (2016), 142-161. https://doi.org/10.1137/15M1013857 [28] H. Rafiei, A. Salehi, F. Baghbani, M. R. Akbarzadeh-T, Evolutionary fuzzy control of pandemics with vaccination and isolation constraints, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 22(5) (2025), 69-96. https: //doi.org/10.22111/ijfs.2025.50369.8889 [29] K. M. Saadabadi, H. Nazaripouya, A. Martinez-Morales, Human-centered sequential load restoration in transmission networks using reinforcement learning, in 2025 IEEE International Conference on Green Energy and Smart Systems (GESS), (2025), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/GESS67704.2025.11297192 [30] A. Saghezchi, V. Ghassemzadeh, F. Ghodratizadeh, A comprehensive optimization approach on financial resource allocation in Scale-Ups, Journal of Business and Management Studies, 6(6) (2024), 62-75. https: //doi.org/10.32996/jbms.2024.6.6.5 [31] P. J. Schmid, Dynamic mode decomposition and its variants, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 54(1) (2022), 225-254. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-030121-015835 [32] B. Shafai, F. Zarei, Design strategies for stabilization and tracking of positive singular systems, in 2025 11th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT), 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/CoDIT66093.2025.11321911 [33] R. Str¨asser, M. Schaller, K. Worthmann, J. Berberich, F. Allg¨ower, Koopman-based feedback design with stability guarantees, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 70(1) (2024), 355-370. https:// doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2024.3425770 [34] T. Takagi, M. Sugeno, Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-15(1) (1985), 116-132. https://doi.org/10. 1109/TSMC.1985.6313399 [35] S. Vladov, Cognitive method for synthesising a fuzzy controller mathematical model using a genetic algorithm for tuning, Big Data Cognitive Computing, 9(1) (2025), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ bdcc9010017 [36] L. Wang, H. K. Lam, J. Gu, Stability and stabilization for fuzzy systems with time delay by applying polynomial membership function and iteration algorithm, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 52(11) (2022), 11604-11613. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2021.3072797 [37] S.Wang, A. Sarrafan, L. Di, Y. Yang, An optimal control approach for additive manufacturing production with waste recycling process, in 2023 62nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), (2023), 8539-8544. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC49753.2023.10383867 [38] M. O. Williams, I. G. Kevrekidis, C. W. Rowley, A data-driven approximation of the Koopman operator: Extending dynamic mode decomposition, Journal of Nonlinear Science, 25(6) (2015), 1307-1346. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00332-015-9258-5 [39] Y. Yang, S. Sui, C. L. P. Chen, Adaptive predefined time control for stochastic switched nonlinear systems with full-state error constraints and input quantization, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2025.3531381 [40] E. Yeung, S. Kundu, N. Hodas, Learning deep neural network representations for Koopman operators of nonlinear dynamical systems, in 2019 American Control Conference (ACC), IEEE, (2019), 4832-4839. https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC.2019.8815339 [41] K. Yuan, K. Gao, Y. Liu, Enhancing gas concentration prediction and ventilation efficiency in deep coal mines: a hybrid DL-Koopman and Fuzzy-PID framework, Scientific Reports, 15(1) (2025), 23630. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00105-3 [42] J. Yuan, S. Zhang, L. Wang, P. Dong, Q. Li, Q. Guo, K. Gao, Distributionally robust optimal control for batch nonlinear switched system under moment uncertainty of parameter using Koopman operator, Optimization, 74(10) (2025), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02331934.2025.2588428 [43] Y. Yuan, D. Zhou, J. Li, C. Lou, Time-varying parameters estimation with adaptive neural network EKF for missile-dual control system, Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 35(2) (2024), 451-462. https://doi.org/10.23919/JSEE.2024.000008 [44] L. A. Zadeh, From computing with numbers to computing with words. From manipulation of measurements to manipulation of perceptions, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, 46(1) (1999), 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1109/81.739259 [45] F. Zarei, B. Shafai, Consensus of multi-agent systems under disturbances using a proportional–integral fading observer, in International Conference on Integrated Systems: Design and Technology, Springer, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-21981-7_7 [46] C. Zhang, J. Hu, J. Qiu, W. Yang, H. Sun, Q. Chen, A novel fuzzy observer-based steering control approach for path tracking in autonomous vehicles, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 27(2) (2018), 278-290. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2856187 [47] F. Zhao, F. D¨orfler, A. Chiuso, K. You, Data-enabled policy optimization for direct adaptive learning of the LQR, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 70(11) (2025), 7271-7232. https://doi.org/10. 1109/TAC.2025.3569597 [48] N. Zhao, H. Zhang, X. Qiu, R. K. Agarwal, Observer-based periodic event-triggered adaptive fuzzy control for networked nonlinear systems, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 55(7) (2025), 3171-3181. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2025.3554702 [49] F. Zhu, W. Du, Observer-based consensus of multi-agent systems under odd distributed impulsive control protocol, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 466 (2024), 128474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. amc.2023.128474 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 41 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 69 |
||