| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 834 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,015 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 14,852,915 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,586,822 |
FUZZY AHP METHOD FOR PLANT SPECIES SELECTION IN MINE RECLAMATION PLANS: CASE STUDY SUNGUN COPPER MINE | ||
| Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 11، شماره 5، دی 2014، صفحه 23-38 اصل مقاله (337.34 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/ijfs.2014.1699 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Iraj Alavi* | ||
| Department of Mining Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| All steps of a mining project generally disturb the environment's original condition during construction. Therefore, it is crucial to implement an appropriate mine reclamation plan throughout all mine planning stages from sustainable and environmental point of view. Planting the suitable plant species in each step of any reclamation plan and each area is one of the necessities in this respect. Selecting of plant species is carried out on the basis of the primary factors. After that priorities between the selected species are defined on account of the secondary factors by a MCDM model. In this regard, a Fuzzy AHP approach was used. This method was applied to Sungun open pit copper mine in Iran as a case study. Decision making was conducted on the basis of oral judgments and group expertise in the case study. The results achieved from the analyses showed that the priorities of alternatives are as Maple, Ash, Oak, Barberry, Paliurus spina -Christi, Sloe, respectively. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Mine reclamation؛ Plant species selection؛ MCDM؛ Fuzzy AHP؛ Sungun open pit copper mine؛ Maple | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
\bibitem{13} A. D. Akbari, M. Osanloo and H. Hamidian, {\it Selecting post mining land use through analytical hierarchy processing method: case study in Sungun copper open pit mine of Iran}, MPES conference, Torino, 2006. \bibitem{10} I. Alavi, A. Akbari and H. Alinejad Rokny, {\it Plant type selection for reclamation of sarcheshmeh copper mine by fuzzy-topsis method}, Adv. Eng. Tech. Appl., {\bf 1}\textbf{(1)} (2012), 8-13. \bibitem{15} I. Alavi, H. R. Alinejad and M. Sadegh zadeh, {\it Prioritizing crescive plant species in choghart iron mine desert region (Used method: Fuzzy AHP)}, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, {\bf 5}\textbf{(12)} (2011), 1075-1078. \bibitem{5} P. Askenasy and J. Brandt, {\it Land capability classification in report of the Soil working Group-Texas mineland reclamation}, Monitoring Program Issues, (1998), 47-58. \bibitem{11} A. H. Bangian and M. Osanloo, {\it Multi attribute decision model for plant species selection in mine reclamation plans: Case study sungun copper mine}, Post-Mining, France, (2008), 1-11. \bibitem{23} R. E. Bellman and L. A. Zadeh, {\it Local and fuzzy logics, modern uses of multiple-valued logic}, Kluwer, Boston, 1977. \bibitem{18} G. Bojadziev and M. Bojadziev, {\it Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic applications}, World Scientific, Singapore, 1996. \bibitem{1} A. Bufardi, R. Gheorghe, D. Kirtsis and P. Hirouchakis, {\it Multicriteria decision aid approach for product end-of-life alternative selection}, Int. J. Prod. Res., {\bf 42} (2004) 3139-3157. \bibitem{32} J. Buckley, {\it Fuzzy hierarchical analysis}, Fuzzy Sets and Systems., {\bf 17} (1985), 233-247. \bibitem{8} P. J. Carrick and R. Kruger, {\it Restoring degraded landscapes in lowland Namaqualand: Lessons from the mining experience and from regional ecological dynamics}, Journal of Arid Environments, {\bf 32} (2007), 52-67. \bibitem{33} D. Y. Chang, {\it Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP}, Eur. J. Oper. Res., {\bf 95} (1996), 649-655. \bibitem{4} N. J. Coppin and A. D. Bradshaw, {\it Quarry reclamation: the establishment of vegetation in quarries and open Pit non- metal mines}, Mining Journal Books Ltd, London, England, (1982), 18-25. \bibitem{24} H. Deng, {\it Multi-criteria analysis with fuzzy pair-wise comparison}, Int. J. Approx. Reason, {\bf 21} (1999), 215-231. \bibitem{17} I. Ertugrul and N. Karakasoglu, {\it Fuzzy TOPSIS method for academic member selection in engineering faculty}, International Joint Conferences on Computer, Information and Systems Sciences, and Engineering (CIS2E 06), (2006), 4-14. \bibitem{21} I. Ertugrul and N. Karakasoglu, {\it Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection}, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech., DOI 10.1007/s00170-007-1249-8, (2007), 1-13. \bibitem{19} I. Ertugrul and A. Tus, {\it Interactive fuzzy linear programming and an application sample at a mine firm}, Fuzzy Optim Decision Making, {\bf 6} (2007), 29-49. \bibitem{6} D. R. Howat, {\it Acceptable salinity, sodicity and pH values for boreal forest reclamation}, Alberta Environment. Environmental Sciences Division, Edmonton Alberta, 2000. \bibitem{3} Y-L. Hsu, Ch-H. Lee and V-B. Kreng, {\it The application of fuzzy delphi method and fuzzy AHP in lubricant regenerative technology selection}, Expert Systems with Applications, {\bf 37} (2010), 419-425. \bibitem{27} G. Kabir and M. A. A. Hasin, {\it Evaluation of customer oriented success factors in mobile commerce using fuzzy AHP}, Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, {\bf 4}\textbf{(2)} (2011), 361-386. \bibitem{29} C. Kahraman, U. Cebeci and Z. Ulukan, {\it Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP}, Logist Inf. Manag., {\bf 16} \textbf{(6)} (2003), 382-394. \bibitem{26} W. B. Lee. H. Lau, Z. Liu and S. Tam, {\it A fuzzy analytical hierarchy process approach in modular product design}, Expert Systems with Applications, {\bf 18}\textbf{(1)} (2001), 32-42. \bibitem{2} I. Mergias, K. Moustakas, A. Papadopoulos and M. Loizidou, {\it Multi-criteria decision aid approach fort he selection of the best compromise management scheme for ELVs: The case of Cyprus}, J. Hazardous Mater, {\bf 147} (2007), 706-717. \bibitem{14} M. Momeni, {\it New Topics in operation research}, Faculty of Management University of Tehran, TEHRAN University Press, {\bf 1} (2006), 187-231. \bibitem{12} M. Osanloo, {\it Mine Reclamation}, Tehran: AMIRKABIR University of Technology Press, {\bf 1} (2001), 183-193. \bibitem{25} T. L. Saaty, {\it The analytical hierarchy process}, Mc-Graw-Hill, New York, 1980. \bibitem{9} H. Soltanmohammadi, M. Osanloo and A. B. Aghajani, {\it An analytical approach with a reliable logic and a ranking policy for post-mining land-use determination}, Land Use Policy, {\bf 27} (2010), 364-372. \bibitem{7} T. C. Tafi, D. Neuman and J. Wraith, {\it Reclamation effectiveness at three reclaimed abandoned mine sites in Jefferson County, Montana}, A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Land Rehabilitation. Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, 2006. \bibitem{28} O. S. Vaidya and S. Kumar, {\it Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications}, Eur. J. Oper. Res., {\bf 169} (2006), 1-29. \bibitem{31} PJ. M. VanLaarhoven and W. Pedrcyz, {\it A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory}, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, {\bf 11} (1983), 229-241. \bibitem{30} T. C. Wang and Y. H. Chen, {\it Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to partnership selection}, Omega, {\bf 35} (2007), 384- 388. \bibitem{16} L. A. Zadeh, {\it Fuzzy sets}, Information and Control, {\bf 8} (1965), 338-353. bibitem{22} L. A. Zadeh, {\it The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning}, Information Science, {\bf 8} (1975), 199- 249. \bibitem{20} H. J. Zimmermann, {\it Fuzzy set theory and its applications}, Kluwer, Boston, 1992. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,953 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 4,200 |
||