پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 834 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,015 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 14,852,914 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,586,822 |
Native and Non-native Use of Lexical Bundles in Discussion Section of Political Science Articles | ||
| Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 5، شماره 2، اسفند 2013، صفحه 137-166 اصل مقاله (249.55 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/ijals.2015.1881 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohammad Meisam Safarzadeh1؛ Abbas Monfared1؛ Mohamad Sarfeju2 | ||
| 1Allameh Tabataba’i University | ||
| 2Payam Noor University | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The study of lexical bundles, among types of text analysis, is gaining importance over the others in the last century. The present study employed a frequency-based analysis approach to the use of lexical bundles. The discussion section of 60 political science articles, with corpora around 253,063 words were investigated in three aspects of structure, form, and function of lexical bundles. The present study selected its data pool out of scholarly articles from qualified journals in the field of political sciences. One part of the data pool was made up of 30 articles written by American native speakers. The second half of the data comprised the 30 articles written by Iranian scholars in political sciences. The findings showed that native and Persian-speaking writers employed the same forms of lexical bundles, and there were significant differences concerning the nativeness and functions. Bearing in mind the findings of the present study, material developers would think of the possibility of the addition of lexical clusters into the materials. It can similarly be valuable for the development of the second language writing strategies, for those who need to write in academic contexts especially political contexts. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Discourse analysis؛ Lexical Bundles؛ ESP؛ Nativism؛ Non-nativism | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Altenberg, B. (1998). On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word-combinations. In A. P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, analysis and applications (pp. 101–122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anthony, L. (2004). AntConc: A Learner and Classroom Friendly, Multi-Platform Corpus Analysis Toolkit. Center for English Language Education in Science and Engineering School of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1 Okubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan.
Ari, O. (2006). Review of three software programs designed to identify lexical bundles. Language Learning and Technology, 30-37, Georgia State University, USA.
Baradaran, A., & Sarfarazi, B. (2011). The impact of scaffolding on the Iranian EFL learners’ English academic writing. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(12), 2265-2273.
Biber , D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at …: lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3), 371- 405.
Biber, D., F. Barbieri. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 263-286.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Brown, C. L. (2007). Strategies for making social studies texts more comprehensible for English-language learners. The Social Studies, (September-October), 185-188.
Brown, H. D. (1994). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents.
Byrd, P., & Coxhead, A. (2010). On the other hand: lexical bundles in academic writing and in the teaching of EAP. Papers in TESOL, University of Sydney, Australia.
Chaudron, C., & Richards, J. (1986). The effect of discourse markers on the comprehension of lectures. Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 113-127.
Chen, Y., & Baker, P. (2010). Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Special Issue on Technology and Learning Vocabulary, University of Lancaster, England.
Cheng, W. (2007). Concgramming: A Corpus-Driven Approach to Learning the Phraseology of Discipline-Specific Texts. CORELL: Computer Resources for Language Learning, 1, 22-35.
Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, Department of English, Iowa State University, 203 Ross Hall, Ames, IA 50014, USA.
Cortes, V. (2006). Teaching lexical bundles in the disciplines: An example from a writing intensive history class. Linguistics and Education, (17), 391-406.
Erman, B. (2007). Cognitive processes as evidence of the idiom principle. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 12(1), 25-53.
Firth, J. R. (1951). Modes of meaning. Essays and Studies (The English Association), 118-149.
Flowerdew, L. (2005). An integration of corpus-based and genre-based approaches to text analysis in EAP/ESP: Countering criticisms against corpus-based methodologies. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 321-332.
Gibbons, M. T. (2006). Hermeneutics, political inquiry, and practical reason: an evolving challenge to political science. American Political Science Review, 100(4), 563-571.
Giles, M. W., & Garand, J. C. (2007). Ranking political science journals: Reputational and citational approaches. Political Science & Politics, 40(4), 741-751.
Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. (1996). Theory and practice of writing: An applied linguistic perspective. New York: Longman.
Haswell, R. (1991). Gaining ground in college writing: Tales of development and interpretation. Dallas: Southern, Methodist University Press.
Hix, S. (2004). A global ranking of political science departments. Political Studies Review, 2(3), 293–313.
Hoey, M. (1991). Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press. England.
Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. London: Routledge.
Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. Center of Academic and Professional Literacies, Institute of Education, University of London, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, United Kingdom.
Hyland, K. (2008). Academic clusters: text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 41-62.
Jalali, H., EslamiRaskh, A., & TavangarRizi, M. (2008). Lexical bundles and intradisciplinary variation: The case of applied linguistics. Iranian Journal of Language Studies, 2(4), 447- 484.
Jalali, H., EslamiRaskh, A., &TavangarRizi, M. (2009). Anticipatory ‘it’ lexical bundles: A comparative study of student and Published writing in applied linguistics. Iranian Journal of Language Studies, 177- 194.
Kubota, R., & Lehner, A. (2004). Toward critical contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 7-27.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), 537-560.
Jespersen, O. (1924). The philosophy of grammar. Allen & Unwin, London.
Juknevičien, R. (2009). Lexical Bundles in learner language: Lithuanian learners vs. native speakers. KALBOTYRA, 61(3), 1-12.
Laane, M. (2011). Lexical bundles in engineering research articles. 10th International Symposium„ Topical Problems in the Field of Electrical and Power Engineering “Pärnu, Estonia, January 10-15, Tallinn University of Technology.
Moon, R. (1998). Fixed expressions and idioms in English: A corpus-based approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press. London.
Nattinger, J., & DeCarrico, J. (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford: OUP.
Neely, E., & Cortes, V. (2009). A little bit about: Analyzing and teaching lexical bundles in academic lectures. Language Value, Georgia State University, USA
Nekrasova, T., M. (2009). English L1 and L2 Speakers’ Knowledge of Lexical Bundles. Language Learning Journal, 59(3), 647-686.
Pang, W. (2010). Lexical bundles and the construction of an academic voice: A pedagogical perspective. British Columbia Institute of Technology, Asian EFL Journal Professional Teaching Articles, 47.
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Native like selection and native like fluency. In J. C. Richards & R.W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication (pp. 191-230). London: Longman.
Ping, P. (2009). A study on the use of four-word lexical bundles in argumentative essays by Chinese English majors: A comparative study based on WECCL and LOCNESS. CELEA Journal (Bimonthly), 32(3).
Rafiee, M., & Tavakoli, M. (2011). Structural Analysis of Lexical Bundles Across Two Types of English News Papers Edited by Native and Non-native speakers. MJAL, 3(2), 218-236.
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation: describing English language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sinclair, J. M. (1999). The lexical item, in E. Weigand (Ed.) Contrastive Lexical Semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
VahidDastjerdi, H. & Rafiee, M. (2010). Corpus study of lexical bundles: Journalistic discourse in focus. The Asian ESP Journal,7(3),59-78.
Van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, ON: The Althouse Press.
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,571 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,947 |
||