اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات31
تعداد شماره‌ها834
تعداد مقالات8,015
تعداد مشاهده مقاله14,852,518
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله9,586,536
Walimbe, S.. (1390). Aryan Invasion in the Indian Subcontinent: Facts and Fallacies The Physical Anthropological Perspectives. نشریه علمی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان, 1(1), 35-43. doi: 10.22111/ijas.2011.456
S. R. Walimbe. "Aryan Invasion in the Indian Subcontinent: Facts and Fallacies The Physical Anthropological Perspectives". نشریه علمی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان, 1, 1, 1390, 35-43. doi: 10.22111/ijas.2011.456
Walimbe, S.. (1390). 'Aryan Invasion in the Indian Subcontinent: Facts and Fallacies The Physical Anthropological Perspectives', نشریه علمی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان, 1(1), pp. 35-43. doi: 10.22111/ijas.2011.456
Walimbe, S.. Aryan Invasion in the Indian Subcontinent: Facts and Fallacies The Physical Anthropological Perspectives. نشریه علمی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان, 1390; 1(1): 35-43. doi: 10.22111/ijas.2011.456

Aryan Invasion in the Indian Subcontinent: Facts and Fallacies The Physical Anthropological Perspectives

Iranian Journal of Archaeological Studies
مقاله 4، دوره 1، شماره 1، مهر 2011، صفحه 35-43    اصل مقاله (750.2 K)
نوع مقاله: Research Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/ijas.2011.456
نویسنده
S. R. Walimbe*
Department of Anthropology, University of Pune, Pune, India
چکیده
The concept of Indo-Aryan group of peoples and their invasion has played a prominent role in explaining the
cultural history of the Indian sub-continent. It was propounded that the Aryans, living somewhere outside India,
invaded the Indian sub-continent around 1500 B.C. and after supplanting the indigenous powers and cultures
settled in India. The Aryans were held responsible for the destruction of the earlier populations (esp. Indus valley
civilization) and building of new cultures in the areas they invaded. The subject of this paper is to examine the
physical anthropological dimensions of the “Aryan problem”, which are two fold: a. “foreign phenotypic
element” in the later phases of Harappan culture, and b. the “massacre evidence” at Mohenjo-Daro.
Findings of the restudies of Harappan skeletal series and implications thereof for evaluating the 'Aryan Invasion
Theory' have been discussed. The findings strongly indicates that the hypothesis of identification of “foreign
phenotypic element” or unceremonious slaughter of native Harappans is not supplemented by bone evidence.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Indo-Aryan؛ Invasion؛ Harappa؛ Mohenjo Daro؛ Physical Anthropology
مراجع
Agrawal, D. P & J. S. Kharakwal.2003 Bronze and Iron Ages in South Asia. NewDelhi: Aryan Books International.
Basu, A; N. Mukherjee; S. Roy; S. Sengupta; S.Banerjee; M. Chakraborty; B. Dey; M. Roy; B. Roy;N.P. Bhattacharyya; S. Roychoudhury & P.P. Majumder.2003 Ethnic India: A Genomic View, withSpecial Reference to Peopling andStructure. Genome Research: 2277-2290.
Dales, G.F.1964 The Mythical Massacre at Mohenjo-Daro.Expedition 6(3):36-43.
1965 New Investigations at Mohenjo-Daro.Archaeology 18:2.
Dhavalikar, M. K.2002 Environment and Culture: A HistoricalPerspective. Pune: Bhandarkar OrientalResearch Institute.
Dutta, P.C.1984 Biological Anthropology of Bronze AgeHarappans: New perspecives. InL.R.Lukacs (ed.) The People of South Asia:The Biological Anthropology of India,Pakistan and Nepal: 59-75. New York: Plenum Press.

Guha, B.S.1935 The Racial Affinities of the People ofIndia. Census of India 1931. 1:III-A:2-22.
1944 Racial Elements in the Indian Population.Oxford Pamphlets on Indian AffairsNo.22. London: Oxford University Press.
Guha, B.S & P.C. Basu.1938 Report on the Human Remains Excavatedat Mohenjo-Daro in 1928-29. In E. J.H.Mackey (ed.) Further Excavations atMohenjo-Daro: 613-638. New Delhi:Government of India.Gupta, P; P.C.Dutta & A.Basu.
1962 Human Skeletal Remains from Harappa.Calcutta: Anthropological Survey of India.
Hawkey, D.E.2002 The peopling of South Asia: Evidence forAffinities and Microevolution of
Prehistoric Populations from India / SriLanka. Spolia Zeylanica 39: 1-300.

Hemphill, B.E; J.R. Lukacs & K. A. R. Kennedy.1991 Biological Adaptations and Affinities ofBronze Age Harappans. In R.H. Meadow(ed.) Harappan Excavation 1986-1990: AMultidisciplinary Approach to ThirdMillennium Urbanism: 137-182. Madison:Prehistory Press.
Hemphill, B.E; A.F. Christensen & S.I. Mustafakulov.1997 Trade or Travel: An Assessment ofInterpopulational Dynamics among BronzeAge Indo-Iranian Populations. In R.Allchin and B. Allchin (eds.) South AsianArchaeology 1995, Vol.2: 855-871. NewDelhi: Oxford & IBH.
Kennedy, K.A.R.1982 Palaeodemographic Perspectives of SocialStructural Change in Harappan Society. InS.Pastner & L.Flam (eds.) Archaeology ofPakistan: Recent Socio-cultural andArchaeological Perspective: 211-218.
Cornell: Cornell University South AsiaProgram.
1984 Trauma and Disease in the Harappans. InB.B. Lal & S.P.Gupta (eds.) Frontiers ofthe Indus Civilization: 425-436. New
Delhi: Books and Books.
Larsen, C.S.1984 Health and Disease in Prehistoric Georgia:The Transition to Agriculture. In M. N.Cohen & G.J. Armelagos (eds.)Paleopathology at the Origins ofAgriculture: 367-392. New York: Academic Press.Lukacs, J.R & S.R. Walimbe.
1984 Palaeodomography at Inamgaon: An EarlyFarming Village in Western India. In L. R.Lukacs (ed.) The People of South Asia:The Biological Anthropology of India,Pakistan and Nepal: 105-132. New York:Plenum Press.
1986 Excavations at Inamgaon: Vol II: ThePhysical Anthropology of Human SkeletalRemains. Part i: An Osteobiographic
Analysis. Pune: Deccan College.
Lukacs, J.R; R.K.Bogorad; S.R.Walimbe &D.C.Dunbar.1986 Palaeopathology at Inamgaon: A Post-Harappan Agrarian Village in WesternIndia. American Philosophical Society,Proceedings 130(3):289-311.
Mackay, E.J.H (ed.)1938 Further Excavations at Mohenjo-Daro.New Delhi: Government of India.
Marshall, J.1931 Mohenjo-Daro and the Indus Civilization.London: Probsthain.
Muller, F. M.1867 Chips from a German Workshop.Essay on the Science and Religion Vol.1.1887 Biographies of Words and the Home of theVedas.
Mughal, M. R.1990 Archaeological field research in Pakistansince independence: An overview. Bulletinof the Deccan College Post-Graduate andResearch Institute 49:261-78.
Mushrif, V. & S.R. Walimbe.2006 Human skeletal remains from ChalcolithicNevasa: Osteobiographic Analysis.
BAR International Series 1476.

London.Mushrif, V; Jamir Tosi & S. R. Walimbe.2008 Human skeletal remains from Jotsoma.Kolkata: Centre for Archaeological Studiesand Training, Eastern India.
Mushrif, V; K. Rajan & S. R. Walimbe.2010 Megalithic Builders of South India:Biological Anthropology of Kodumanal
Population. Bhopal-Pune-New Delhi:Indira Gandhi Rashtriya ManavSangrahalaya, Centre for Ancient Human
Skeletal Studies, and Aryan BooksInternational.

Pattanayak, D.P.1998 The Language Heritage of India. In D.Balasubramanian & N. Appaji Rao (eds.)The Indian HumanHeritage: 95-99.Hyderabad: University Press.
Poliakov, L.1974 The Aryan Myth. New York: Basic Books.

Ratnagar, S.1999 Back to the Bones. Man and Environment23:101-15.
Sewell, R.B.S & B.S. Guha.1931 Human Remains. In J. Marshall (ed.)Mohenjo-Daro and the Indus Civilization:
599-684. London: Probsthain.
Singh, K.S.1998 The People of India: Diversities andLinkages. In D. Balasubramanian & N.Appaji Rao (eds.) The Indian HumanHeritage: 78-86. Hyderabad: UniversityPress.
Tripathi, Jayant K; K. Tripathi; Barbara Bock; V.Rajamani & A. Eisenhauer.2004. Is River Ghaggar, Saraswati?:
Geochemical Constraints. Current Science87 (8).
Walimbe, S. R.1998 Bio-cultural Adaptations in CranialMorphology among the Early FarmingChalcolithic Populations of the DeccanPlateau. In M.K. Bhasin & S.L. Malik(eds.) Contemporary Studies in HumanEcology: Human factor, Resource
Management and Development: 25-40.
Delhi: Indian Society for Human Ecology.1990 Human Skeletal Remains. In M. K.Dhavalikar; V.S.Shinde & S.Atre (eds.)
Excavations at Kaothe: 111-231. Pune:Deccan College.
Wheeler,R.E.M.1968 The Indus Civilization. 3rd ed. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 4,644
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3,676


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب