Nominalization in Academic Writing: A Cross-disciplinary Investigation of Physics and Applied Linguistics Empirical Research Articles

Abdi, R. (2011). Metadiscourse strategies in research articles: A study of the differences across subsections. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 3(1), 1-16.

Abdi, R. (2009). Projecting cultural identity through metadiscourse marking; A comparison of Persian and English research articles. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 212, 1-15.

Abdollahzadeh, E. (2011). Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers. Journal of Pragmatics. 43, 288-297.

Ahmad, J. (2012). Stylistic features of scientific English: A study of scientific research articles. English Language and Literature Studies, 2(1), 47-55.

Alise, M. A. (2008). Disciplinary differences in preferred research methods: A comparison of groups in the Biglan classification scheme (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.

Babaii, E., & Ansary, H. (2005). On the effect of disciplinary variation on transitivity: The case of academic book reviews. Asian EFL journal, 7(3), 113-126.

Banks, D. (2008). The development of scientific writing: Linguistic features and historical context. London: Equinox.

Banks, D. (2005). On the historical origins of nominalized process in scientific text. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 347–357.

Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2013). Nominalizing the verb phrase in academic science writing. The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora, 9, 1-27.

Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (2004). The functional analysis of English: A Hallidayan approach. London: Arnold.

Cameron, J. S. (2011). Comprehend to comprehension: Teaching nominalization to secondary ELD teachers (Master thesis). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1500013)

Coffin, C., Curry, M., Goodman, S., Hewings, A., Lillis, T., & Swann, J. (2003). Teaching academic writing: A tool kit for higher education. London: Routledge.

Comrie, B., & Thompson, S. A. (2007). Lexical nominalization. In Shopen, T. (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description (vol. 3, 2nd edition) (pp. 334‒381). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crookes, G. (1986). Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure. Applied Linguistics, 7, 57-70.

Ezeifeka, C. R. (2014). Grammatical Metaphor in SFL: A Rhetorical Resource for Academic Writing. UJAH: Unizik Journal of Arts and Humanities, 12(1), 207-221.

Fang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2008). Reading in secondary content areas: A language-based pedagogy. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

Fatonah, F. (2014). Students’ understanding of the realization of nominalization in scientific text. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 87-98.

Galve, G. I. (1998). The textual interplay of grammatical metaphor on the nominalization occurring in written medical English. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 363-385. Retrieved from http://www.docin.com.

Giannoni, D. S. (2002). Worlds of gratitude: A contrastive study of acknowledgement texts in English and Italian research articles. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 1-31.

Gillaerts, P., & Van de Velde, F. (2010). Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 128-139.

Glanzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2003). A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics, 56(3), 357–367.

Hadidi, Y., & Raghami, A. (2012). A comparative study of ideational grammatical metaphor in business and political texts. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(2), 348-365.

Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1999).The language of early childhood. London: Continuum.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (2005).Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: The Falmer Press.

Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, M. I. M. (1999). Construing experience through meaning, a language based approach to cognition. New York: Norfolk.

Heyvaert, L. (2003). Nominalization as grammatical metaphor. On the need for a radically systemic and metafunctional approach. In S. Vandenberge, M, Taverniers, & J. Ravelli, (Eds.), Grammatical metaphor: Views from systemic functional linguistics (pp. 65-99). Retrieved from http:// www.books.google.com.

Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 321-337.

Holtz, M. (2009). Nominalization in scientific discourse: A corpus-based study of abstracts and research articles. In M. Mahlberg, Michaela, V. Gonzalez-Diaz & C. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5^th Corpus Linguistics Conference Liverpool, UK. Retrieved December 25, 2014 from http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/publications/cl2009/

Hu, G., & Cao, F. (2011). Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English-and Chinese-medium journals. Journal of pragmatics, 43(11), 2795-2809Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied linguistics, 17(4), 433-454

Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 4-21.

Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse: English in a global context. London: Continuum.

Hyland, K. (2006). Disciplinary differences: Language variation in academic discourses. In K. Hyland & M. Bondi (Eds.), Academic discourse across disciplines (pp. 17-45). Frankfort: Peter Lang.

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum: London.

Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jalilifar, A. R., Saleh, E. & Don., A. (2017a). Exploring nominalization in the introduction and method sections of applied linguistics research articles: A qualitative approach. Romanian Journal of English Studies, 14, 64-80.

Jalilifar, A. R., White, P., & Malekizadeh, E. (2017b). Exploring nominalization in scientific textbooks: A cross-disciplinary study of hard and soft sciences. International Journal of English Studies, 17(2), 1-20.

Jalilifar, A., Alipour, M., & Parsa, S. (2014). Comparative study of nominalization in applied linguistics and biology books. Research in Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 24-43.

Jalilifar, A. (2012). Academic attribution: Citation analysis in master’s theses and research articles in applied linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 23-41.

Jalilifar, A. R. (2011). World of attitudes in research article discussion sections: A cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of Technology & Education, 5(3), 177-186.

Kazemian, B., & Hashemi, S. (2014). Nominalizations in scientific and political genres: Asystemic functional linguistics perspective. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 211-228. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2514388

Koutsantoni, D. (2006). Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academic literacy and relations of power. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(1), 19-36.

Lim, J. M. H. (2010). Commenting on research results in applied linguistics and education: A comparative genre-based investigation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 280-294.

Lock, G. (1996). Functional English grammar: An introduction for second language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http:// www.books.google.com.

Mair, C., & Leech, G. (2006). Current changes in English syntax. In Bas Aarts and April McMahon. (Eds.), The handbook of English linguistics (pp. 318- 342). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.

Moltmann, F. (2007). Events, Tropes, and Truthmaking. Philisophical Studies, 134(3), 363-403.

Nivalas, M. L. (2011). Hedging in college research papers: Implications for language instruction. Asian EFL Journals, 35-45

Noonan, M. (2007). Complementation. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, (Vol. 2, 2nd edition, pp. 52‒150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oztürk, I. (2007). The textual organisation of research article introductions in applied linguistics: Variability within a single discipline. English for Specific Purposes, 26(1), 25-38.

Pun, F. K., Webster, J. (2009). Building of academic discourse in university students’ writing. In ASFLA Conference: Practicing Theory: Expanding Understandings of Language, Literature and Literacy, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.

Ramanathan, V., & Kaplan, R. B. (2000). Genres, authors, discourse communities: Theory and application for (L1 and) L2 writing instructors. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 171-191.

Rathert, M., & Alexiadou, A. (Eds.). (2010). The semantics of nominalizations across languages and frameworks (Vol. 22). Walter de Gruyter.

Ren, H. & Li, Y. (2011). A Comparison Study on the Rhetorical Moves of Abstracts in Published Research Articles and Master’s Foreign-language Theses. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 162-166.

Ruiying, Y., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in the applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22 (4), 365-385.

Samraj, B. (2005). An exploration of a genre set: RA abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 141-156.

Samraj, B. (2002). Introductions in RAs: Variation across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 1-17.

Sarani, A., & Talati, A. (2015). Nominalization in the writing of novice vs. experienced members of academic community: a comparative study. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 7(2), 203-231.

Samar, R. G., & Talebzadeh, H. (2006). Professionals write like this: The case of ESP/EAP experimental research article abstracts. In first Post-Graduate Conference, University of Tehran, Iran.

Starfield, S. (2004). Word power: Negotiating success in a first-year Sociology essay. In L. J. Ravelli & R. A. Ellis (Eds.), Analyzing academic writing: Contextualized framework (pp. 66-83). London/New York: Continuum.

Sušinskienė, S. (2004). Grammatical metaphor in scientific discourse. KALBOTYRA, 54(4), 76-83.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English for academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thompson, J. (2004). Introducing functional grammar. London: Arnold.

To V., Lê T., & Lê Q. (2013). A comparative study of nominalization in IELTS writing test papers. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research, 4, 15-21.

Vazquez, I., & Giner, D. (2008). Beyond mood and modality: Epistemic modality markers as hedges in research articles. A cross-disciplinary study. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses. 21, 171-190.

Vu Thi, M. (2012). Grammatical metaphor in English pharmaceutical discourse. Unpublished MA thesis. Vietnam.

Wenyan, G. (2012). Nominalization in medical papers: A comparative study. Studies in Literature and Language, 4(1), 86-93.

Yang, B. (2014). Using Non-Finites in English Academic Writing by Chinese EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 7(2), 42-52. 

Zarei, G. R., & Mansoori, S. (2012). An analysis of disciplinary distinction between Persian and English: A case study of computer sciences. Journal of MJAL, 4(1), 1-15.

Zucchi, A. (1993). The language of propositions and events. Issues in the syntax and semantics of nominalization. Dordrecht: Kluwer