پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 834 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,015 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 14,854,818 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,587,849 |
The Investigation and Comparison of “Orthographic Depth” in Persian and English Writing Systems through the Homography Feature | ||
| Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies | ||
| دوره 16، شماره 2، دی 2024، صفحه 129-144 اصل مقاله (538.86 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/ijals.2024.46415.2372 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Abbas Ali Ahangar* 1؛ Tahereh Taromi2 | ||
| 1Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran | ||
| 2Department of English Language Teaching, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The concept of “orthographic depth” refers to the degree of the deviation of the writing system from the one-to-one correspondence between graphemes and phonemes. This study aims to explore and compare of the “orthographic depth” between Persian and English writing systems using UTPECC corpus and homographic scale. To this end, the scope of the application of the homography feature in 10000 words of Persian writing system was determined by using the word processing software 2010 through the synchronic study in the field of graphology. Then, the occurrence frequency of this feature was briefly compared with a similar number of words in English writing system. The research results show only 4 graphemes possess homography feature in Persian writing system, each of which corresponds to a limited number of phonemes (maximum 4 phonemes). While this feature is observed in 11 graphemes of English writing system and the variety of their corresponding phonemes was much more than Persian writing system. Considering the fact that the extent of the occurrence of the homography feature in English writing system is significantly higher than Persian writing system, it can be stated that the orthographic depth of English writing system exceeds that of Persian writing system. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| grapheme؛ homography؛ orthographic depth؛ phoneme؛ writing system | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abol-ghasemi, M. (2017). A History of the Persian Language. Samt.
Ahangar, A. A., & Mojahedi Rezaeian, S. (2023). English phonetics: A practical guide. University of Sistan and Baluchestan Press.
Asi, M. (2006). Persian in Raya Sepehr. Nameye Farhangestan. 8 (3), 59- 70.
Bateni, M. R., (2019). Language and Thought. Agah.
Bijankhan, M., & Alaee Abouzar, E. (2013). Orthographic depth of Persian. Language Research, 1(4), 1- 19.
Carney, E. (1994). A Survey of English Spelling. Blackwell.
Coulmas, F. (1989). The Writing Systems of the World. Blackwell.
Coulmas, F. (2003). Writing Systems: An Introduction to their Linguistic Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Crowther, J. (1996). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Oxford University Press.
Cruttenden, A. (2014). Gimson's Pronunciation of English, 8th Edition. Routledge.
Danaye Tous, M. (2004). Transparency of Persian Script and its Impact on Dyslexic and Natural Persian Speaking Children [PhD Dissertation, Tehran University]. Tehran.
Fischer, S. R. (2001). A History of Writing. ReaKtion Books Ltd.
Gontijo, P. F. D., Gontijo, I., & Shillcock, R. (2003). Grapheme- Phoneme Probabilities in British English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 35(1), 136-157.
Haghshenas, A. M., (2013). Phonetics. Agah.
Kaboli, I. (2005). Persian Orthography. Baztab Negar.
Mahmoudi Bakhtiari, B. (2000). Persian Orthograpy: appropriate or not?. Persian Language and Literature Teaching, 55, 63- 70.
Modarresi, Y. (1992). Language Issues and Language Planning in Iran. Farhang, 13, 177- 206.
Natel Khanlari, P. (1987). Linguistics and Persian Language. Tous.
Neisari, S. (1995). Persian Script Grammar: A Study of the Relationship between Persian Script and Persian Language. Tab’ va Nashr.
Raman, I. (2006). Are Acquired Dyslexias and Dysgraphias Language-Specific or Universal?. The Iranian Journal of Contemporary Psychology, 1 (2).
Rogers, H. (2005). Writing Systems, A Linguistic Approach. Blackwell.
Rostami, A., Rezaei, H., & Rafiei, A. (2014). A study of orthographic depth effect on Persian spelling errors in Azari speaking students. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 2 (5), 75- 98.
Safavi, K. (2016). An Introduction to Writing Systems. Pezhvak.
Samareh, Y. (2015). Persian Phonetics. Iran University Press.
Sampson, G. (1985). Writing Systems: A Linguistic Introduction. Hutchinson.
Sproat, R. (2000). A Computational Theory of Writing Systems. Cambridge University Press.
Venezky, R. L. (1999). The American Way of Spelling. Guildford Press.
Widjaja, V., & Winskel, H. (2004). Phonological Awareness and Word Reading in a Transparent Orthography: Preliminary Findings on Indonesian. Macqarie University, Sydney.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 321 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 215 |
||