پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 834 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,015 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 14,852,483 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,586,508 |
The Influence of Population Variability on Pelvic Sexual Dimorphism: A Case Study from the Parthian Cemetery (247 BCE to 224 AD), Liyarsangbon in Guilan, Iran. | ||
| Iranian Journal of Archaeological Studies | ||
| دوره 15، شماره 1، 2025، صفحه 55-68 اصل مقاله (1.27 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/ijas.2025.52451.1354 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Mohammad Reza Eghdami* | ||
| Department of Humanity and Literature, University of Guilan, Guilan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| A population-specific approach to skeletal analysis is critical due to the impacts of environmental and cultural factors on human variation. This study analysed sex determination in 77 individuals, discovered from the Liyar- Sang-Bon cemetery in Guilan, Iran (2016–2018), using both metric and non-metric innominate bone assessments. Its primary aim was to evaluate the applicability of global standards and identify factors shaping anatomical variation in this population. Initial analyses applied global sex determination methods, followed by statistical comparisons (t-tests) to identify reliable indicators within the pelvis, including the sacrum and Os coxae. The results reveal significant sexual dimorphism in certain pelvic regions, although not all indicators met the statistical threshold (P<0.05). These findings highlight the limitations of universal standards, emphasising the need for population-specific data. They also demonstrated that results may vary when using with larger or more diverse samples. The study underscores the challenges of pelvic-based sex estimation due to biological and population diversity. By comparing traditional and modern methods, it advocates for localised methodologies and contributes invaluable insights into human biodiversity. Future research that integrates broader skeletal evidence with larger sample sizes is essential for refining techniques and enhancing accuracy in both forensic and bioarchaeological applications. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Local Sex Determination؛ Metric and Nonmetric Measurements؛ Statistical Analysis؛ Sexual Dimorphism؛ Liyarsangbon؛ Guilan | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Bass, W. M. 2005. Human Osteology: A Laboratory and Field Manual. Columbia: Missouri Archaeological Society
Boucher, B. J. 1957. Sex Differences in the Foetal Pelvis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 15(4): 581-600. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330150409
Buikstra, J. E. 1994. Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains. Arkansas : Arkansas Archaeological Survey Research Series .
Buikstra, J & R.E. Scott. 2009. Key Concepts in Identity Studies. In K.J. Knlidson & C.M.Stojanowski,(eds.), Bioarchaeology and Identity in the Americas . Florida : University Press of Florida, 24-55.
Chambers, J. M; W.S. Cleveland; B.Kleiner & P.A.Tukey. 2018. Graphical Methods for Data Analysis. USA:Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351072304
Choi, S. C & M.Trotter. 1970. A Statistical Study of the Multivariate Structure and Race-Sex Differences of American White and Negro Fetal Skeletons. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 33(3): 307-312. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/ajpa.1330330304
Eghdami, M. R; V. Jahani; M.G. Roudbordeh & S.H.Mousavi. 2023. Excavations of Parthian Human Bone Remains at Liyarsangbon Cemetery, Amlash District, Guilan Province, Iran: with Special Reference to Sexed Patterns of Burial and Gender Discrimination. Near Eastern Archaeology 86(2): 122-131. https://doi.org/10.1086/724787
Fischer, B & P. Mitteroecker. 2017. Allometry and Sexual Dimorphism in the Human Pelvis. The Anatomical Record 300(4): 698-705. https://doi.org/ 0.1002/ar.23549
Flander, L. B. 1978. Univariate and Multivariate Methods for Sexing the Sacrum. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 49(1): 103-110. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/ajpa.1330490116
Franklin, D; C.E. Oxnard; P. O'Higgins & I.Dadour. 2007. Sexual Dimorphism in the Subadult Mandible: Quantification Using Geometric Morphometrics. Journal of Forensic Sciences 52(1): 6-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00311.x
Grauer, A. L. 1995. Bodies of Evidence: Reconstructing History Through Skeletal Analysis. New York : John Wiley & Sons.
Gray, H; P.L.Williams & L.H. Bannister.1995. Gray’s Anatomy: the Anatomical Basis of Medicine and Surgery.UK :Chancellor Press.
Gray, H; P.L.Williams & L.H. Bannister.1999. Gray's Anatomy : the Anatomical Basis of Medicine and Surgery (38th ed.).New Yurk: Churchill Livingstone.
Haas, J; J.E. Buikstra; D.H. Ubelaker; D. Aftandilian; F.M.O.N. History & A.A.Survey. 1994. Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains: Proceedings of a Seminar at the Field Museum of Natural History, Organized by Jonathan Haas. Arkansas : Arkansas Archeological Survey. https://books.google.com/books?id=dnt2QgAACAAJ
Huseynov, A; C.P. Zollikofer; W. Coudyzer; D. Gascho; C. Kellenberger; R. Hinzpeter & M.S.Ponce de León.2016. Developmental Evidence for Obstetric Adaptation of the Human Female Pelvis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(19): 5227-5232. https://doi.org/ 0.1073/pnas.1517085113
Kelly, H. J & L. Reynolds. 1947. Appearance and Growth of Ossification Centers and Increases in the Body Dimensions of White and Negro Infants. The American Journal of Roentgenology and Radium Therapy 57(4): 477-516.
Klales, A. R; S.D. Ousley & J.M.Vollner.2012. A Revised Method of Sexing the Human Innominate Using Phenice's Nonmetric Traits and Statistical Methods. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 149(1): 104-114. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/ajpa.22102
Kranioti, E. F & M. Michalodimitrakis.2009. Sexual Dimorphism of the Humerus in Contemporary Cretans--a Population-Specific Study and a Review of the Literature. J Forensic Sci 54(5): 996-1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01103.x
Krogman, W. M & M.Y. İşcan.1986. The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine.USA: C.C. Thomas. https://books.google.com/books?id=oFBrAAAAMAAJ
Mann, H B & D.R.Whitney. 1947. “On a Test of Whether One of TwoRandom Variables is Stochastically Larger Than the Other,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 18(1): 50-60.
Martin, R. 1928. Lehrbuch Der Anthropologie in Systematischer Darstellung Mit Besonderer Berücksichtigung Der Anthropologischen Methoden für Studierende ärtze Und Forschungsreisende: bd. Bibliographie, literaturverzeichnis, Sachregister, Autorenregister ,[ Textbook of Anthropology in Systematic Presentation with Special Consideration of Anthropological Methods for Students, Doctors, and Explorers: vol. Bibliography, Bibliography, Subject Index, Author Index ],Volume 3. Jena :G. Fischer.
McCown, T. D. 1939. The Stone Age of Mount Carmel. The Fossil Humman Remains from the Levalloiso-Mousterian. New Yurk: AMS Press.
Mittler, D. M; S.G. Sheridan & S. Sheridan.1992. Sex Determination in Subadults Using Auricular Surface Morphology: a Forensic Science Perspective. Journal of Forensic Sciences 37(4): 1068-1075.
Moore, K. L; A.F. Dalley & A.M.R.Agur.2013. Clinically Oriented Anatomy. Philadelphia :Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health. https://books.google.com/books?id=-Le5bc5F0sYC
Phenice, T. W. 1969. A Newly Developed Visual Method of Sexing the os Pubis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 30(2): 297-301. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/ajpa.1330300214
Schmidt-Schultz, T. H & M.Schultz. 2004. Bone Protects Proteins Over Thousands of Years: Extraction, Analysis, and Interpretation of Extracellular Matrix Proteins in Archeological Skeletal Remains. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 123(1): 30-39. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/ajpa.10308
Schönburg, S; T. Bukethal & P.Fornara. 2020. Does Age Alone Negatively Predict the Outcome of Sacral Neuromodulation? A Single-Centre Retrospective Observational Study. BMC Urology 20(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s12894-020-00621-6
Schultz, A. H. 1930. The Skeleton of the Trunk and Limbs of Higher Primates. Human Biology 2(3): 303-438.
Schutkowski, H. 1993. Sex Determination of Infant and Juvenile Skeletons: I. Morphognostic Features. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 90(2): 199-205. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/ajpa.1330900206
Singh, S & B.R.Potturi.1978. Greater Sciatic Notch in Sex Determination. J Anat 125(Pt 3):619-624.
Standring, S & N.R.Borley.2008. Gray's Anatomy:The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. Brazil: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier. https://books.google.com/books?id=kvhkPQAACAAJ
Standring, S. 2021. Gray’s Anatomy E-Book: Gray’s Anatomy E-Book. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences.
Sutherland, L. D & J.M.Suchey.1991. Use of the Ventral arc in Pubic Sex Determination. Journal of Forensic Sciences 36(2): 501-511.
Tague, R. G. 1992. Sexual Dimorphism in the Human Bony Pelvis, with a Consideration of the Neandertal Pelvis from Kebara Cave, Israel. American journal of physical Anthropology 88(1): 1-21. https://doi.org/ 0.1002/ajpa.1330880102
Ubelaker, D. H & C.G. Volk.2002. A Test of the Phenice Method for the Estimation of Sex. Journal of Forensic Sciences 47(1): 19-24.
Vlak, D; M. Roksandic & M.A.Schillaci.2008. Greater Sciatic Notch as a Sex Indicator in Juveniles. American Journal of Physical Anthropology: The Official Publication of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists 137(3): 309-315. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/ajpa.20875
White, T. D; M.T. Black & P.A. Folkens.2011. Human Osteology. USA:Academic Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=oCSG2mYlD90C | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 506 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 222 |
||