| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 838 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,088 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 15,230,552 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 10,171,847 |
Design of a Two-Layer Adaptive Gain Scheduling Type-II Fuzzy Logic Controller for Improved Seismic Resilience in Multistory Structures | ||
| Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems | ||
| دوره 23، شماره 3، مرداد و شهریور 2026، صفحه 31-50 اصل مقاله (1.97 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/ijfs.2026.52466.9253 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohammad Reza Kamali Ardakani1؛ Sajjad Rezvani Khaledi2؛ Mahdi Pourgholi* 3 | ||
| 1Faculty of Automation Engineering, University of Bologna, Italy, Bologna | ||
| 2Faculty of Bioinformatics, University of Bologna, Italy, Bologna | ||
| 3Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This study introduces a novel Two-Layer Type-II Adaptive Fuzzy Logic Controller (2LT2-FLC) to enhance seismic resilience in structural engineering. The innovative dual-layer approach integrates an inner adaptive fuzzy layer, which dynamically adjusts input scaling gains in real-time based on the instantaneous range of structural response, with a core fuzzy layer that employs interpretable IF-THEN rules to compute control forces. This design overcomes the limitations of controllers with static parameters by providing continuous self-adaptation to varying seismic excitation levels. The controller's performance was evaluated on a nonlinear four-story steel frame benchmark model, with parameters validated against established structural dynamics literature, under historical earthquake records (Kobe and Northridge). The proposed 2LT2-FLC significantly reduced peak inter-story drift—by 50.18% on the second floor and 47.69% on the fourth floor during the Kobe earthquake—outperforming both Type-II Fuzzy-PID and ANFIS-PID controllers. The controller operates with an average computation time of approximately 0.2 milliseconds per time step, confirming its suitability for real-time applications. By simplifying real-time adaptation for nonlinear systems, the 2LT2-FLC ensures robust, interpretable, and computationally efficient control, presenting a significant advancement for practical seismic mitigation. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Type- II Fuzzy Logic Controller؛ ANFIS-PID؛ Fuzzy-PID؛ CGO Optimization؛ Seismic resilience | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] H. Aggumus, R. Guclu, Hybrid experimental investigation of MR damper controlled tuned mass damper used for structures under earthquakes, Journal of Soft Computing and Artificial Intelligence, 3(1) (2022), 28-33. https: //doi.org/10.55195/jscai.1122514 [2] C. O. Azeloglu, A. Sagirli, A. Edincliler, Vibration mitigation of nonlinear crane system against earthquake excitations with the self-tuning fuzzy logic PID controller, Nonlinear Dynamics, 84(4) (2016), 1915-1928. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-2616-5 [3] M. Azizi, et al., Upgraded whale optimization algorithm for fuzzy logic based vibration control of nonlinear steel structure, Engineering Structures, 192 (2019), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.05.007 [4] Y. Bigdeli, D. Kim, Damping effects of the passive control devices on structural vibration control: TMD, TLC and TLCD for varying total masses, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(1) (2016), 301-308. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s12205-015-0365-5 [5] M. Bozorgvar, S. M. Zahrai, Semi-active seismic control of buildings using MR damper and adaptive neural-fuzzy intelligent controller optimized with genetic algorithm, Journal of Vibration and Control, 25(2) (2018), 273-285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546318774502 [6] J. C. Butcher, G. Wanner, Runge-Kutta methods: Some historical notes, Applied Numerical Mathematics, 22(1-3) (1996), 113-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9274(96)00048-7 [7] S. Das, et al., A novel fractional order fuzzy PID controller and its optimal time domain tuning based on integral performance indices, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 25(2) (2012), 430-442. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.engappai.2011.10.004 [8] S. Das, I. Pan, S. Das, Performance comparison of optimal fractional order hybrid fuzzy PID controllers for handling oscillatory fractional order processes with dead time, ISA Transactions, 52(4) (2013), 550-566. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2013.03.004 [9] F. Fathi, A. K. Ashtiani, M. R. K. Ardakani, M. Pourgholi, A. H. Fesahat, M. Gholinia. Adaptive fuzzy control of structures using slime Mould algorithm for earthquake vibration reduction, in 2025 11th International Conference on Control, Instrumentation and Automation (ICCIA), 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIA69223.2025. 11285952 [10] S. Golnargesi, H. Shariatmadar, H. M. Razavi, Seismic control of buildings with active tuned mass damper through interval type-2 fuzzy logic controller including soil–structure interaction, Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 19(2) (2018), 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-018-0016-5 [11] R. Guclu, H. Yazici, Vibration control of a structure with ATMD against earthquake using fuzzy logic controllers, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 318(1-2) (2008), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2008.03.058 [12] M. S. Jaballah, S. Harzallah, B. Nail, Vibration control and seismic damages reduction for structural buildings based on optimal fractional-order controller and a graphical user interface development, Journal of Vibration Engineering and Technologies, 11(8) (2023), 4349-4370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00819-y [13] S. Pourzeynali, H. H. Lavasani, A. Modarayi, Active control of high rise building structures using fuzzy logic and genetic algorithms, Engineering Structures, 29(3) (2007), 346-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct. 2006.04.015 [14] M. Ramirez-Neria, J. Morales-Valdez, W. Yu, Active vibration control of building structure using active disturbance rejection control, Journal of Vibration and Control, 28(17-18) (2021), 2171-2186. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 10775463211009377 [15] Y. Shen, A. Homaifar, D. Chen. Vibration control of flexible structures using fuzzy logic and genetic algorithms, in Proceedings of the 2000 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No. 00CH36334), IEEE, 2000. https: //doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2000.878940 [16] S. Talatahari, M. Azizi, Chaos game optimization: A novel metaheuristic algorithm, Artificial Intelligence Review, 54(2) (2020), 917-1004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09867-w [17] S. Thenozhi, W. Yu, Advances in modeling and vibration control of building structures, Annual Reviews in Control, 37(2) (2013), 346-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2013.09.012 [18] R. S. Tomar, M. F. Qureshi, S. K. Shrivastava, Development of ANFIS controller and PID controller for seismic vibration control of structural system, International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science, 3(11) (2016), 138-150. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaers/3.11.24 [19] A. P. Wang, Y. H. Lin, Vibration control of a tall building subjected to earthquake excitation, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 299(4-5) (2007), 757-773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2006.07.016 [20] S. Yaghoobi, S. Fadali, G. Pekcan, Performance-based active controller design for nonlinear structures using modified black hole optimization, Journal of Vibration and Control, 30(3-4) (2023), 711-726. https://doi.org/10. 1177/10775463221150053 [21] J. P. Zand, J. Sabouri, J. Katebi, M. Nouri, A new time-domain robust anti-windup PID control scheme for vibration suppression of building structure, Engineering Structures, 244 (2021), 112819. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.engstruct.2021.112819 [22] Z. Y. Zhao, M. Tomizuka, S. Isaka, Fuzzy gain scheduling of PID controllers, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23(5) (1993), 1392-1398. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.260670 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 16 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 25 |
||