پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 840 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,114 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 15,651,980 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 10,380,619 |
Cultural Resilience in Conditions of Uncertainty: Technological, Environmental, Social, and Epistemic Dimensions | ||
| Iranian Journal of Archaeological Studies | ||
| دوره 16، شماره 1، 2026، صفحه 1-4 اصل مقاله (235.65 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Editorial Note | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/ijas.2026.55860.1403 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Mehdi Mortazavi* | ||
| Editor-in-Chief, Department of Archaeology and Archaeological Sciences Research Centre, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This note explores the concept of “cultural resilience” as a dynamic and multidimensional process within archaeological and heritage studies, encompassing technological, environmental, social, and epistemic dimensions. The core context and primary catalyst for this analysis are the recent escalating conflicts and crises in West Asia, an urgent situation that once again highlights the necessity of re-evaluating the concepts of vulnerability and the continuity of cultural structures under acute crisis conditions. Drawing upon critical and post-processual archaeological perspectives, contemporary epistemic challenges are articulated, particularly the concentration of cultural data within global institutions and the imperative of “repatriating knowledge to source communities” to maintain interpretive authority. In this regard, six case studies from the Iranian Journal of Archaeological Studies (IJAS) are introduced, illustrating various manifestations of this adaptation and sustainability across the Iranian Plateau and neighbouring regions (including: continuity in ceramic technology, knowledge management in early administrative systems, environmental adaptation of subsistence, ritual stability during transitional periods, the spatial organizational flexibility of mobile societies, and the reinterpretation of ancient architectural knowledge). Ultimately, the note concludes that the sustainability of cultural heritage in conditions of uncertainty requires a shift from centralised structures toward participatory and polyphonic models. To this end, the establishment of local heritage associations is proposed as an effective mechanism for decentralisation, restoring epistemic justice, and enhancing the agency and rapid response capacities of source communities during crises. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Cultural Resilience؛ Regional Crises؛ Epistemic Justice؛ Source Communities؛ Participatory Heritage Management | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Aronson, J; D. Cil; P.K. Huth & B.I. Daniels.2025. Attacks on History: The Causes of Cultural Heritage Damage during Armed Conflict. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 31(2): 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537113.2024.2415784
Atalay, S. 2012. Community-Based Archaeology: Research with, by, and for Indigenous and Local Communities.Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bennett, T. 1995. The Birth of the Museum: History, Theory, Politics. London: Routledge.
Boast, R. 2011. Neocolonial Collaboration: Museum as Contact Zone Revisited. Museum Anthropology 34(1), 56–70.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1379.2010.01107.x
Cuno, J. 2011. Who Owns Antiquity? Museums and the Battle over Our Ancient Heritage. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hodder, I. 2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Løvschal, M. 2022. Retranslating Resilience Theory in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 51(1): 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-041320-011705
Lydon, J & U.Z. Rizvi, (eds.). 2016. Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology. London: Routledge.
Mlekuž Vrhovnik, D. 2026. Resilience and the Afterlives of Events: Archaeological Theory for Heritage Practice. Heritage 9(3): 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage9030090
Mortazavi, M. 2010. Irresponsibility in Archaeology, Estonian Journal of Archaeology 14(2): 143-152.
Mortazavi, M. 2018. Uncertainty in Iranian Archaeology. Journal of the Asiatic Society for Mumbai, 91(1): 1-14.
Redman, C. L. 2005. Resilience Theory in Archaeology. American Anthropologist 107(1): 70–77. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3567674
Ripp, M; A. Egusquiza & D. Lückerath. 2024. Urban Heritage Resilience: An Integrated and Operationable Definition from the SHELTER and ARCH Projects. Land 13(12): 2052. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13122052
Smith, L. 2006. Uses of Heritage.London:Routledge
Shanks, M & C. Tilley. 1987. Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 6 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2 |
||