تعداد نشریات | 27 |
تعداد شمارهها | 586 |
تعداد مقالات | 6,016 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 8,765,610 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,773,314 |
بررسی رابطهی آوای کارکنان با تسهیم دانش | ||
پژوهش های مدیریت عمومی | ||
مقاله 4، دوره 10، شماره 35، خرداد 1396، صفحه 85-104 اصل مقاله (798.86 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/jmr.2017.3254 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
ناصر ناستی زایی ![]() | ||
1استادیار دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان | ||
2دانشجوی دکترای مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه شیراز | ||
چکیده | ||
تسهیم دانش مکانیزمی است که با انتشار و کمک به کاربرد دانش، کارکنان را در تحقق وظایف شغلی خود یاری میکند. این مکانیزم میتواند تحت تأثیر عوامل مختلف فردی و سازمانی باشد. از این رو مطالعه حاضر با هدف بررسی رابطه بین آوای کارکنان با تسهیم دانش انجام گرفت. روش پژوهش توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بوده و روش جمعآوری دادهها شامل بررسی پیمایشی میباشد. جامعه آماری شامل تمامی اعضای هیات علمی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان بوده که با استفاده از روش نمونهگیری تصادفی طبقهای (بر حسب جنسیت، مرتبه علمی و رشته آموزشی) تعداد 183 نفر انتخاب و مورد مطالعه قرار گرفتند. به منظور بررسی متغیرهای پژوهش از پرسشنامههای آوای کارکنان و تسهیم دانشاستفاده شد. برای تعیین پایایی از آزمون آلفا کرونباخ استفاده شد که مقدار ضریب برای آوای مطیع 85/0، آوای تدافعی 81/0 و آوای نوعدوستانه 79/0 و برای تسهیم دانش 87/0 به دست آمد . برای تجزیه و تحلیل دادهها از ضریب همبستگی و رگرسیون چندگانه همزمان با کمک نرم افزارSPSS21 استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد مقدار ضریب همبستگی آواهای: مطیع، تدافعی و نوعدوستانه با تسهیم دانش به ترتیب 577/0-، 409/0- و 671/0 بود (001/0p<). نتایج تحلیل رگرسیون چندگانه نیز نشان داد که آوای کارکنان 3/52 درصد از واریانس تسهیم دانش را تبیین میکند (001/0p<) که از بین آوای کارکنان، آوای نوعدوستانه با مقدار β (516/0) اثر مثبت و آوای مطیع با مقدار β (329/0-) اثر منفی بر تسهیم دانش دارد (001/0p<). بنابراین با افزایش آواهای مطیع و تدافعی از میزان تسهیم دانش کاسته میشود اما با افزایش آوای نوعدوستانه بر میزان تسهیم دانش افزوده میگردد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
آوای مطیع؛ آوای تدافعی؛ آوای نوعدوستانه؛ تسهیم دانش | ||
مراجع | ||
1-Adli, F. (2005). Knowledge Management, Movement beyond Knowledge, Tehran: Andisheh Metacognition Publishing. (In Persian)
2-Alavi M, Liedner DE. (2001). Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 25(1):107-136.
3-Armstrong M. (2006). Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice (10th ed.). London: Kogan Page, Limited.
4-Boxall, P., Purcell, J. (2003). Strategy and Human Resource Management, London: Palgrave.
5-Bryson, A. (2004). Managerial Responsiveness to Union and Nonunion Worker Voice in Britain, Industrial Relations,43(1):213–241.
6-Budd JW, Gollan PJ, & Wilkinson A. (2010) .New Approaches to Employee Voice and Participation in Organizations. Human relations.63 (3):303–310.
7-Chan S. (2013). Paternalistic leadership and employee voice: does knowledge sharing matter?, Human relations,1(1):1-27.
8-Cheng J, Chang S, Kuo J,& Cheung y.(2014).Ethical leadership, work engagement and voice behavior, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(5):817-831.
9-Cross R, Sproull L. (2004). More Than an Answer: Information Relationships for Actionable Knowledge, Organization Science, 15(4):446–462.
10-Detert JR, Burris ER. (2007). Leadership Behavior and Employee Voice: Is The Door Really Open?, Academy of Management Journal, 50(4):869–884.
11-Donaghey J, Cullinane N, Dundon T, & Wilkinson A. (2011). Reconceptualising Employee Silence: Problems and Prognosis, Work, Employment and Society,25(1):51–67.
12-Dundon T, Gollan PJ. (2007). Re-Conceptualizing Voice in the Non-Union Workplace, International Journal of Human Resource Management,18(7):1182–1198.
13-Dundon T, Wilkinson A, Marchington M, & Ackers P. (2004). The Meanings and Purpose of Employee Voice, International Journal of Human Resource Management,15(6):1149–1170.
14-Dustar, M., Esmailzadeh M.Organizational Justice and its Effects on Employees Voice and Performance, Management Studies in Development and Evolution, 22(72):341-361. (in Persian)
15-Eisenberg EM, Goodall HL. (2001). Organizational communication: Balancing creativity and constraint. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin.
16-Fullan M. (2002). The role of leadership in the promotion of knowledge management in schools, Teachers and teaching: theory and practice, 8(3):409-419.
17-Gao L, Janssen O, Shi K. (2011). Leader trust and employee voice: the moderating role of empowering leader behaviors, The leadership qurtely,22 (4):787-798.
18-Hames KM. (2012). Employees’ voice climate perceptions and perceived importance of voice behavior: links with important work-related outcomes, Thesis of Bachelor of Psychology (Honors), Murdoch University.
19-Hansen M. (2002). Knowledge networks: explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies, Organization Science,13(3):232−248.
20-Ipe M. (2003). Knowledge sharing in organizations: A conceptual framework, Human Resource Development Review, 2(4):337- 359.
21-Kadivar A, Ebrahimpoor Arangi L. (2016). Identifying the effective factor of knowledge sharing system acceptance from knowledge workers perspective. Journal of Information Processing and Management; 31 (4) :1031-1048 (In Persian)
22-Karimi, M., Shajaee, S. (2015). Studying the relationship between paternalistic leadership and employees' voice emphasizing on moderator role of knowledge sharing of employees at branches of Saderat Bank in Golestan Province, Management of Governmental Organizations,3(10):21-41. (In Persian)
23-Kulkarni S. (2010). Sustaining the equality of employee voice, a dynamic capability, International journal of organizational analysis,18(4):442-465.
24-Li y, Sun JM. (2014). Traditional chinese leadership and employee voice bahavior:a crosss- level examination, The leadership quarterly,26(2):172-189.
25-Liu M, Liu N. (2008). Sources of knowledge acquisition and patterns of knowledge-sharing behaviors: An empirical study of Taiwanese high-tech firms, International Journal of Information Management, 28(5):423–432.
26-Liu W, Zhu R, & Yang Y. (2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership, The Leadership Quarterly 21(1):189-202.
27-McAdam R, Moffett S, Peng J. (2012). Knowledge sharing in Chinese service organizations: a multi case cultural perspective, Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(1):129-147.
28-Morrison, E.W. & Wheeler-Smith, S.L. & Kamdar, D. (2011). Speaking up in groups: a cross-level study of group voice climate and voice, Journal of Applied Psychology, 96 (1): 183-191.
29-Musavi, M., Zand Hesami, H. (2015). Extracting Key Dimensions of Knowledge Sharing, Industrial Management Magazine, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj Branch, Journal of Industrial Management Faculty of Humaities,10(44):75-80. (In Persian)
30-Nikolaou L, Vakola M, Bourantas D. (2008). Who speaks up at work?dispositional influences on employees' voice behavior, Personnel review,37(6):666-676.
31-Panahi S, Watson J, Partridge H. (2012). Social media and tacit knowledge sharing: Developing a conceptual model, Word Academy of Science; Engineering and Technology, (64):1095-1102.
32-Sanjaghi ME, Akhavan P, & Najafi S. (2013). Fostering knowledge sharing behavior: The role of organizational culture and trust. International Journal of the Academy of Organizational Behavior Management, 5 (April- June):2- 26.
33-Talebnejad, A. (2008). Designing and explaining knowledge creation strategies at universities of the Islamic Republic of Iran, PhD thesis, Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran. (In Persian)
34-Tong C, Ip Wah T, Walder, Wong A. (2013). The impact of knowledge sharing on the relationship between organizational culture and job satisfaction: The perception of information communication and technology (ICT) practitioners in Hong Kong, International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 1(3):9-37.
35-Travis, DJ. & Gomez, J.R., & Mor B. (2011). Speaking up and stepping back: Examining the link between employee voice and job neglect, Children and Youth Services Review, 33(10): 1831-1841.
36-Van Dyne L, Le Pine J. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity, Academy of Management Journal, 41(1):108-119.
37-Van Dyne L, Ang S, & Botero I. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as mulitidimensional constructs, Journal of management studies, 40 (6):1359-1392.
38-Wang R, Jiang J. (2015). How abusive supervisors influence employees voice and silence: the effects of interactional justice and organizational attribution, The journal of social psychology, 155(3):204-220.
39-Zareematin, H., Taheri, F., Sayyar, A. (2012). Organizational silence: concepts, antecedents, and consequences volume 6 (number 21), 77-104 (In Persian)
40-Zeinabad H., Mahmoudi Z. (2016). The role of principals in primary school teachers’ knowledge development and sharing: Introducing knowledge sharing leadership variable, Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovations, 15(57):85-103. (in Persian)
41-Zhao H. (2014). Relative leader-member exchange and employee voice: mediating role of affective commitment and moderating role of Chinese traditionality, Chinese Management,8(1):27-40.
42-Zhu W, He H, Treviño LK, Chao MM, & Wang W. (2015). Ethical leadership and follower voice and performance: the role of follower identifications and entity morality beliefs, Leadership Quarterly, 26(5):702–718. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,310 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,761 |