اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 32 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 757 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,326 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,142,190 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,291,972 |
Transmission of Ideology through Translation: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Chomsky’s “Media Control” and its Persian Translations | ||
| Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 1، شماره 1، مهر 2009، صفحه 24-42 اصل مقاله (125.26 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/ijals.2011.44 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Zahra Khajeh1؛ Hajar Khanmohammad* 2 | ||
| 1Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas Branch | ||
| 2Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Among factors that might manipulate translators’ mind while producing a text is the notion of ideology transmission through text or talk. Adopting Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) with particular emphasis on the framework of Van Dijk (1999), the present investigation is an attempt to shed light on the relationship between language and ideology involved in translation in general, and more specifically, to uncover the underlying ideological assumptions invisible in the texts, both source text (ST) and target text (TT), and consequently ascertain whether or not translators’ ideologies are imposed in their translations. The corpus consists of the full text of two different Persian translations of the book Media Control by Noam Chomsky, written in English. In a qualitative phase, a detailed contrastive/comparative study at the micro-level in terms of fore/back-grounding mechanisms including explanation of lexical items and dominant grammatical metaphors (passive vs. active, nominalization vs. de-nominalization, addition vs. omission, and modalization) was conducted to examine, describe and subsequently interpret the patterns in the English source text and its Persian translated versions. In order to make the research data interpretations as objective as possible, having computed frequencies of ideologically significant instances, and percentages, Chi-square formula was applied to find out any difference between proportions of information extracted from the target text concerning their fore/back-grounding and their positions against the source text as well as to test the research null hypothesis, which was consequently rejected. The findings reveal that there are significant changes made by the two translators, either intentionally or unintentionally, in their selection of lexical items and syntactic structures in comparison to those in the source text. The findings of the study also show that many distortions or transformations between the original and the two translated versions were not only arbitrary, but also ideologically encoded in the texts, with specific purposes and functions. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| critical discourse analysis؛ ideology؛ Power؛ fore/back-grounding؛ discursive practice؛ micro/macro structure؛ domestication؛ foreignization؛ grammatical metaphors؛ lexicalization | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Basil, H., and Munday, J. (2004). Translation an Advanced Resource Book,New York: Routledge.
Chomsky, N. (2002). Media Control: The Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda,New York: Seven Stories Press.
Cook, G. (2003). Applied Linguistics,UK:OxfordUniversity Press.
Fairclough, N. (1991). Language and Power,New York: Longman.
Hatim, B., and Mason, I.(1997). The Translator as Communicator,London andNew York: Routledge.
Hodge, B., and Kress, G. (2nd ed.) (1993). Language as ideology,London andNew York: Routledge.
Karoubi, B. (2005). Ideology and Translation with a concluding point on translation teaching [HTML Document] retrieved [04.02.06] available at: http://www.translationdirectory.com/article 233.htm
Munday, J. (2004). Introducing TRANSLATION STUDIES,New York: Routledge.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1988). News as Discourse,Hillside,NJ: Erlbaum.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1999). “Critical Discourse Analysis and Conversation Analysis”, in Discourse and Society 10(4), pp. 459-470.
Van Dijk, T.A. (2000). Critical discourse analysis [HTML Document] retrieved
[25.01.06] available at:
Venuti, L. (1997). The scandals of translation: Towards an ethics of differences,New York: Routledge.
احمدی گیوی، حسن و انوری، حسن (1385). دستور زبان فارسی 1و2 (ویرایش سوم)، انتشارات فاطمی، تهران. انوری، حسن (1383). فرهنگ سخن روز، انتشارات سخن، تهران. آقاگل زاده، فردوس (1385). تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی: تکوین تحلیل گفتمان در زبان شناسی، انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی، تهران. پاک نهاد جبروتی، مریم (1381). فرادستی و فرودستی در زبان، گام نو، تهران. تاجیک، محمدرضا (1379). گفتمان و تحلیل گفتمانی، انتشارات فرهنگ گفتمان، تهران. چامسکی، نوام (1928). کنترل رسانه ها، مترجم ضیا خسرو شاهی، نشر درسا 1385، چاپ دوم، تهران. چامسکی، نوام (1928). حاکمیت بر رسانه ها، مترجم سعید ساری اصلانی، انتشارات فرهنگ گفتمان 1385، چاپ اول، تهران. چامسکی، نوام و مویر، بل (1997). زبان و اندیشه، مترجم کوروش صفوی، انتشارات هرمس 1384، تهران. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 4,853 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 8,913 |
||