Gender-Based Investigation of the Syntactic Development of Iranian EFL Learners: A Focus on Processabilty Theory

Alhawary, M. T. (1999). Testing processability and effectiveness of computer-assisted language instruction: A longitudinal study of Arabic as a second/foreign language. Georgetown University: United States -District of Columbia.

Alhawary, M. T. (2009).Speech processing prerequisites or L1 transfer? Evidence from English and French L2 learners of Arabic. Foreign Language Annals, 42(2), 367-390.

Bleses, D., Vach, W., Slott, M., Wehberg, S., Thomsen, P., Madsen, T. O., & Basbøll, H. (2008). The Danish communicative developmental inventories: Validity and main developmental trends. Journal of Child Language, 35(3), 651-669.

Bohnacker, C. (2006). When Swedes begin to learn German: From V2 to V2. Second Language Research, 22, 443–486.

Bonilla, C.L. (2012). Testing processability theory in l2 Spanish: Can readiness or markedness predict development? (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Pittsburgh, PA. Retrieved from http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/11611/

Buyl, A., & Housen, A. (2015). Developmental stages in receptive grammar acquisition: A processability theory account. Second Language Research, 31, 523-550.

Charters, H., Dao, L., & Jansen, L. (2011).Reassessing the applicability of processability theory: The case of nominal plural. Second Language Research, 27, 509-533.

Cuza, A., & Perez-Tattam, R. (2016). Grammatical gender selection and phrasal word order in child heritage Spanish: A feature re-assembly approach. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(1), 50-68.

Dao, L. (2007). Foreign language acquisition: Processes and constraints (Doctoral dissertation). Australian National University, Australia. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/openview/7551fab52c56f006b258d6fa96545b8f/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S. (2002). Exploring the typological plausibility of processability theory: Language development in Italian second language and Japanese second language. Second Language Research, 18, 274–302.

Dyson, B. (2009). Processability Theory and the role of morphology in English as a second language development: A longitudinal study. Second Language Research, 25(3), 355-376.

Dyson, B., M. (2016). Variation, individual differences and second language processing a processability theory study. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6(4), 341–395.

Eguchi, A., & Sugiura, M. (2015) Applicability of processability theory to Japanese adolescent EFL learners: A case study of early L2 syntactic and morphological development. System, 52, 115-126.

Fenson, L., Marchman, V. A., Thal, D. J., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., & Bates, E. (2007). MacArthur-Bates communicative development inventories: Users guide and technical manual. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.

Fetter, R. (1996). A Test of Pienemann and Johnston’s Tentative Developmental Stages in ESL Development. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED391374.

Gao, X. D. (2005). Noun phrase morphemes and topic development in L2 mandarin Chinese: A processability perspective (Doctoral Dissertation). Victoria University of Wellington, USA. Retrieved from https://www.schweitzer-online.de/buch/Gao/NOUN-PHRASE-ORPHEMES-TOPIC-DEVELOPMENT-L2-MANDARIN-CHINESE/9783838319605/A19117432/

Glahn, E., Hakansson, G., Hammarberg, B., Holmen, A., Hvenekilde, A., `& Lund, K. (2001). Processability in Scandinavian second language acquisition, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 389-416.

Hakansson, G., Pienemann, M., & Sayehli, S. (2002). Transfer and typological proximity in the context of second language processing. Second Language Research, 18(3), 250-273.

Iwasaki, J. (2003). The acquisition of verbal morpho-syntax in JSL by a child learner. Proceeding of 13th Biennial Conference of the JSAA, Brisbane, July 2-4.

Itani-Adams, Y. (2003).From word to phrase in Japanese-English bilingual first language acquisition. Proceeding of The MARCS seminar, 15th September at University of Western Sydney.

Jansen, L. (2008). Acquisition of German word order in tutored learners: A cross-sectional study in a wider theoretical context. Language Learning, 58(1), 185-231.

Kawaguchi, S. (2000). Acquisition of Japanese verbal morphology: Applying processability theory to Japanese. Studia Linguistica, 54(2), 238–248.

Kawaguchi, S. (2005a). Argument structure and syntactic development in Japanese as a second language. In M., Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 253-298). Benjamins: Amsterdam, New York.

Kawaguchi, S. (2005b). L1 transfer in Japanese L2 in learners of typologically distant languages. The Proceedings of CAESS Research Conference 2005, October 7th - 9^that the University of Western Sydney.

Kempen, G., & Hoenkamp, E. (1987).An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201-258.

Khansir, A. A., & Zaab, M. (2015). The impact of process ability theory on the speaking abilities of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(2), 343-349.

Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking from intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Mackey, A. (1995). Stepping up the Pace: Input, interaction and interlanguage development: An empirical study of questions in ESL (Doctoral dissertation). University of Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/title/stepping-up-the-pace-input-interaction-and-interlanguage-development-an-empirical-study-of-questions-in-esl/oclc/50571729

Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557-587.

Mahdavi, P. (2007). Passionate uprisings: Young people, sexuality and politics in post‐revolutionary Iran. Culture, health & sexuality, 9(5), 445-457.

Mansouri, F. (1997). From emergence to acquisition: Developmental issues in Arabic interlanguage morphology. The Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 20 (1), 83-104.

Mansouri, F. (2002). Exploring the interface between syntax and morphology in second language development. In B. Di Biase (Ed.) Developing a second language: Acquisition, processing and pedagogy of Arabic, Chinese, English, Italian, Japanese, Swedish (pp. 59-72). Melbourne: Language Australia.

Nishitani, A. (2012). A hierarchy of grammatical difficulty for Japanese EFL learners: Multiple-Choice items and processability theory (Doctoral dissertation). Temple University, Philadelphia, USA. Retrieved from http://digital.library.temple.edu/cdm/ref/collection/p245801coll10/id/176422

Ozdemir, B. (2004).Language development in Turkish-German bilingual children

and the implications for English as a third language (Master’s thesis). University of Paderborn, Germany.

Pienemann, M. (1998a). Developmental dynamics in L1 and L2 acquisition: Processability theory and generative entrenchment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 1-20.

Pienemann, M. (1998b). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Pienemann, M. (1998c). A focus on processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 36-38.

Pienemann, M. (Ed.) (2005). Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Pienemann, M. (2015). An outline of processability theory and its relationship to other approaches to SLA. Language Learning, 65(1), 123–151.

Pienemann, M., & Hakansson, G. (1999). A unified approach towards the developmental of Swedish as L2: A processability account. SSLA, 21, 383-420.

Pienemann, M., & Hakansson, G. (2007). Full transfer vs. developmentally moderated transfer: A reply to Bohnacker. Second Language Research, 23, 485-493.

Pienemann, M., & Johnston, M. (1987). Factors influencing the development of language proficiency. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Applying second language acquisition research (pp. 45–141). Adelaide: National Curriculum Resource Centre.

Pienemann, M., Johnston, M., & Brindley, G. (1988). Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10 (2), 217–243.

Reid, J., M. (1995). Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. New York: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Senecal, A. (2011).Processing the L2 comprehension process: Testing process ability theory’s predictions in an ERP study of adult learners of L2 Swedish (Master’s thesis). Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University. Retrieved from https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/lup/publication/2439371

Silva, M. L. (2002). Syntax Development: The Relevance of Realistic Methods. Aportesmetodológicos, Interdisciplinaria, 27 (2), 277-296.

Simonsen, H. G., Kristoffersen, K. E., Bleses, D., Wehberg, S., & Jørgensen, R. N. (2014). The Norwegian communicative development inventories: Reliability, main developmental trends and gender differences. First Language, 34(1), 3-23.

Spinner, P. (2013). Language production and reception: A processability theory study. Language Learning, 63, 704–39.

Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, Ma. & London: Harvard University Press.

Taylor, R. (2004). Developmental hierarchy for L2 Spanish: A PT perspective. Paper presented at the Fourth International Symposium on Processability, Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism, University of Sassari, April.

Wang, X. (2011). Grammatical development among Chinese L2 learners: From a processability account (Doctoral dissertation). Newcastle University, United Kingdom). Retrieved from

https://theses.ncl.ac.uk/dspace/bitstream/10443/1301/1/Wang%2C%20X.%2011.pdf

Yamaguchi, Y. (2013). Child second language learning: A study of English as a second language acquisition. Sydney: Lambert.

Zhang, Y. Y. (2001).Second language acquisition of Chinese grammatical morphemes: A processability perspective (Doctoral dissertation). Australian National University, Australia. Retrieved from https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/9804

Zhang, Y. Y. (2008). Adverb-placement and wh-questions in the L2 Chinese of English speakers: Is transfer a structural property or a processing constraint?. In J. Kessler (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language development and second language learning (pp.215-247). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.