تعداد نشریات | 27 |
تعداد شمارهها | 566 |
تعداد مقالات | 5,825 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 8,163,945 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,462,012 |
The 2-additive fuzzy Choquet integral-based TODIM method with improved score function under hesitant fuzzy environment | ||
Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems | ||
مقاله 10، دوره 16، شماره 4، مهر و آبان 2019، صفحه 129-143 اصل مقاله (210.2 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/ijfs.2019.4787 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
C. Wu* ؛ D. Zhang | ||
School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, Peoples Republic of China | ||
چکیده | ||
Recently, the TODIM$^1$(an acronym in Portuguese of interactive and multi-criteria decision making) method has attracted increasing attention and many researchers have extended it to deal with multiple attribute decision making (MADM) problems under different situations. However, none of them can be used to handle MADM problems with positive, independent, and negative interactions among attributes, which restricts the applicability of TODIM method. Therefore, in this paper, we propose the 2-additive fuzzy Choquet integral-based hesitant fuzzy TODIM method to deal with this situation. To begin with, we propose the novel measured function to compare the magnitude of hesitant fuzzy elements, which has been proved to be more rational and efficient than existing approaches. Then we use nonlinear programming to obtain 2-additive fuzzy measures and then put forward novel Choquet integral based-dominance degree to calculate the dominance degree of one alternative over another under all attributes. Consequently, we then calculate the global value of each alternative whereby we can rank all the alternatives. Finally, an illustrate example is used to demonstrate the efficiency and applicability of the proposed approach with sensitivity analysis. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Multiple attribute decision making (MADM)؛ TODIM؛ interactive attributes؛ 2-additive fuzzy measure؛ Choquet integral based-dominance degree؛ hesitant fuzzy set؛ measured function | ||
مراجع | ||
[1] K. T. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1) (1986), 87-96. [2] K. Atanassov, G. Gargov, Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 31(3) (1989), 343-349. [3] E. Ayae, A hybrid approach to machine-tool selection through AHP and simulation, International Journal of Pro- duction Research, 45(9) (2007), 2029-2050. [4] Q. Bao, D. Ruan, Y. Shen, E. Hermans, D. Janssens, Improved hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS for road safety performance evaluation, Knowledge-Based Systems, 32(8) (2012), 84-90. [5] D. E. Bell, Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty, Operations Research, 33(1) (1985), 1-27. [6] D. E. Bell, Regret in decision making under uncertainty, Operations Research, 30(5) (1982), 961-981. [7] E. Cagno, F. Caron, M. Mancini, F. Ruggeri, Using AHP in determining the prior distributions on gas pipeline failures in a robust Bayesian approach, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 67(3) (2000), 275-284. [8] C. Camerer, Bounded rationality in individual decision making, Experimental Economics, 1(2) (1998), 163-183. [9] C. L. Chang, C. H. Hsu, Multi-criteria analysis via the VIKOR method for prioritizing land-use restraint strategies in the Tseng-Wen reservoir watershed, Journal of Environmental Management, 90(11) (2009), 3226-3230. [10] G. Charness, M. Rabin, Expressed preferences and behavior in experimental games, Games and Economic Behavior, 53(2) (2004), 151-169. [11] B. Farhadinia, A novel method of ranking hesitant fuzzy values for multiple attribute decision-making problems, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 28(8) (2013), 752-767. [12] Z. P. Fan, X. Zhang, F. D. Chen, Y. Liu, Extended todim method for hybrid multiple attribute decision making problems, Knowledge-Based Systems, 42(2) (2013), 40-48. [13] L. F. A. M. Gomes, M. M. P. P. Lima, Todim: Basic and application to multicriteria ranking of projects with environmental impacts, Foundations and Computing and Decision Sciences, 16(4) (1992), 113-127. [14] L. F. A. M. Gomes, M. A. S. Machado, L.A.D. Rangel, Behavioral multi-criteria decision analysis: The Todim method with criteria interactions, Annals of Operations Research, 211(1) (2013), 531-548. [15] L. F. A. M. Gomes, L. S. A. Rangel, An application of the Todim method to the multicriteria rental evaluation of residential properties, European Journal of Operational Research, 193(1) (2009), 204-211. [16] M. Grabisch, The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making, European Journal of Operational Research, 89(3) (1996), 445-456. [17] M. Grabisch, K-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representation, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 92(2) (1997), 167-189. [18] M. Grabisch, C. Labreuche, A decade of application of the choquet and sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid, 4OR, 175(1) (2008), 1-44. [19] R. A. Krohling, T. T. M. D. Souza, Combining prospect theory and fuzzy numbers to multi-criteria decision making, Expert Systems with Applications, 39(13) (2012), 11487-11493. [20] C.T. Lin, C. Lee, J.K. Lin, Using the fuzzy Todim method as a decision making support methodology for house purchasing, Journal of Testing andAta:IFS Evaluation, 44(5) (2016), 1925-1936. [21] M. Li, C. Wu, L. Zhang, An intuitionistic fuzzy-Todim method to solve distributor evaluation and selection problem, International Journal of Simulation Modelling, 14(3) (2015), 511-524. [22] H. Liao, Z. Xu, Multiplicative consistency of hesitant fuzzy preference relation and its application in group decision making, International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 13(1) (2014), 47-76. [23] J. L. Marichal, Entropy of discrete choquet capacities, European Journal of Operational Research, 137(3) (2002), 612-624. [24] F. Meng, C. Tan, Q. Zhang, The induced generalized interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid shapley averaging operator and its application in decision making, Knowledge-Based Systems, 42(2) (2013), 9-19. [25] A. Shanian, O. Savadogo, TOPSIS multiple-criteria decision support analysis for material selection of metallic bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cell, Journal of Power Sources, 159(2) (2006), 1095-1104. [26] C. Tan, Z. Z. Jiang, X. Chen, An extended Todim method for hesitant fuzzy interactive multicriteria decision making based on generalized choquet integral, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 29(1) (2015), 293-305. [27] V. Torra, Hesitant fuzzy sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25(6) (2010), 529-539. [28] A. Tversky, D. Kahneman, Advances in prospect theory: Cummulative representation of uncertainty, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4) (1992), 297-323. [29] M. Xia, Z. Xu, Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 52(3) (2011), 410-425. [30] Z. Xu, M. Xia, On distance and correlation measures of Hesitant fuzzy information, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 26(5) (2011), 410-425. [31] Y. P. O. Yang, H. M. Shieh, G. H. Tzeng, A VIKOR technique based on DEMATEL and ANP for information security risk control assessment, Information Sciences, 232(5) (2013), 482-500. [32] L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy Sets, Information and Control,8(3) (1965), 338-353. [33] X. Zhang, Z. Xu, The Todim analysis approach based on novel measured functions under Hesitant fuzzy environ- ment, Knowledge-Based Systems, 61(2) (2014), 48-58. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 940 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 219 |