|تعداد مشاهده مقاله||9,882,268|
|تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله||6,471,768|
Identity Representation Strategies used by English and EL2 Political Actors and Researchers
|Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies|
|مقاله 6، دوره 11، شماره 1، شهریور 2019، صفحه 161-180 اصل مقاله (145.9 K)|
|نوع مقاله: Research Paper|
|شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/ijals.2019.4935|
|Forouzan Rezaei* ؛ Reza Ghafar Samar|
|Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran|
|Previous literature on the study of identity representation in political discourse has been mainly concerned with the spoken discourse and the representation of self. However, the way different groups of political agents represent others’ identities across languages has not attracted much attention. Using Wodak’s (2007) Discourse Historical approach to CDA, the present study investigates the way EL2 and English speaking political actors and researchers in the context of Iran and the U.S represent others’ identities in their political discourse. Through purposive sampling, 28 English political speeches and columns produced by native and non-native (Persian) speakers of English were selected for analysis. The results of CDA, as well as Chi-square tests of statistical significance, indicated there were differences in the quality and quantity of the strategies employed by the two groups of political agents across language groups. EL2 speakers of English used more implicit, covert, anonymous and less transparent as well as more distant representation strategies than English agents who tended to use more explicit, direct and involved strategies. Implications were drawn for ESP material development at an advanced level.|
|Nomination؛ Perspectivation؛ Political Actor؛ Political Researcher؛ Discourse Historical Approach|
Archetti, C. (2014). Politicians, personal image, and the construction of political identity: A comparative study of the U.K. and Italy. U.K: Palgrave, Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137353429
Augoustinos, M., & Riggs, D. (2007). Presenting ‘Us’ and ‘Them’: Constructing white identities in everyday talk. In G. Moloney, & I. Walker (Eds.), Social representation and identity (pp. 109-130). Palgrave, Macmillan.
Bayram, F. (2010). Ideology and political discourse: A critical discourse analysis of Erdogan’s political speech. Annual Review of Education, Communication and Language Science, 7, 23-40.
Block, D. (2006). Identity in applied linguistics. In T. Omoniyi, & G. White (Eds.), Sociolinguistics of identity. London: Continuum.
Bwenge, C. (2009). Linguistic identity(re) construction in electoral politics: The case of 2005 Tanzanian parliamentary campaigns. Selected Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, 166-178. Retrieved Febraury 17, 2018, from www.lingref.com
Crawshaw, R., & Tusting, K. (2000). Exploring French text analysis: Interpretations of natural identity. London: Routlege.
Deters, P. (2011). Identity, agency and the acquisition of professional land Cultuure. Continuum International Company.
Dornyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2009). Motivation, language attitudes and the L2 self. In Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 350-356). NY: Multilingual matters.
Duncan, N. (2003). Race, talk: Discourses on ‘race’ and racial difference. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 135-156. doi:10.1016/S0147-1767(02)00095-0
Eslami, Z. R., & Eslami-Rasekh, A. (2008). Enhancing the pragmatic competence of non-native English-speaking teacher candidates (NNESTCs). In E. S. Alcon, & A. Martinez-Flor (Eds.), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning teaching and testing (pp. 178-197). Bristol, U.K: Multilingual Matters.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman Group UK.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Foley, V. (2001). Practices of looking: An introduction to visual culture. In M. C. Sturken (Ed.), Practices of looking: Images, power and politics (pp. 10-44). OUP.
Gleibs, I. H., Hendrick, K., & Kurz, T. (2017). Identity mediators: Leadership and identity construction in campaign speeches of American presidential candidates’ spouses. Political Psychology, xx(xx), 1-18. doi:10.1111/pops.12448
Gu, C. (2018). Mediating ‘face’ in triadic political communication: A CDA analysis of press conference interpreters’ discursive (re) construction of Chinese government’s images. Critical Discourse Studies, 1-21. doi:DOI: 10.1080/17405904.2018.1538890
Gurevitch, M., Benett, T., Curran, J. & Wollacott, J. (1990). Culture, society and the media. London and New York: Routledge.
Hall, J. (2013). Language and identity. In J. Hall, Teaching and researching language and culture (pp. 30-45). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315833712
Ilie, C. (2010). Identity construction in parliamentary discourse practices: Discourse strategies and interaction practices. In C. Ilie, & C. Ilie (Ed.), European parliaments under scrutiny (pp. 57-78). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Bnjamins Publishing Company.
Jensen, K. (2008). Under construction: Afrikaner identities in contemporary South Africa Approached through discourse theory and the discoursze-historical approach (Unpublished matster’s thesis). Denmark: Aalborg university.
Lauerback, G. (2006). Discourse representation in political interviews: The construction of identities and relations through voicing and ventrriloquizing. Pragmatics, 38, 196-215.
McGowen, J. (1993). Postmodern purity. Post Modern Culture, 4(1).
Miller, C., Strong, R., Vinson, M., & Brugma, C. (2014). Ritualized Indirectness in Persian: Taarof and related strategies of interpersonal management. University of Maryland Center for Advance Study of Language.
Norton, B. (2010). Language and identity. In N. Hornhurger, & S. McKay (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 349-369). Canada: Multilingual Matters.
Norton, B. (2013). Identity and Language Learning. Bristol, U.K.: Multilingual Matters.
Pyykko, R. (2003). Who is ‘us’ in Russian political discourse?. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Us and others: Social Identities across languages, discourse sand cultures (pp. 233-249). John Benjaminbs Publishing Company.
Qaiwer, S. (2016). A study of identity construction in political discourse (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Nothingham.
Reisigl, M., & Wodak,R. (2001). Discourse and discrimination. London and New York: Routledge.
Sikanku, G. (2013). Barack Obama’s identity construction and international media representations during the 2008 presidential election: A discursive and comparative framing analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Iowa University, Iowa.
Skenderi, E. (2014). We the Balkanians: A critical discourse analysis of the political discourse (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Bergen, Norway.
Szilagyi, A. (2017). How the far right hijacked political correctness. Retrieved July 10, 2018, from www.qz.com/886552/a-linguist-explains-how-the-far-right-hijacked-political-correctness/.
Tan, K. H., & Farashaiyan, A. (2015). The evaluation of Iranian EFL learners’ interlanguage pragmatic knowledge through the productions of speech acts. Asian Social Science, 11(23), 83-95.
Tekin, B. (2010). Representations and othering in discourse. Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 39, 153-204.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wodak, R. (2007). Discourse in European Union Oranizations. Text & Talk, 27(5/6), 655-680. doi:10.1515/TEXT.2007.030
Wodak, R., Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Liebhart, K. (2009). The discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage Publications.
Zhong, Y. (2014). A critical discourse analysis of government spokesman’s identity construction: A case study. International Journal of English Litersature, 4(3), 74-81.
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 595
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 276