دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات29
تعداد شماره‌ها630
تعداد مقالات6,368
تعداد مشاهده مقاله9,734,102
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله6,365,020
Homayoun, Fahimeh, Zare, Younes, Zare, Siroos. (1400). Stoneworking Techniques at Persepolis from Quarry to the Terrace. نشریه علمی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان, 11(2), 125-129. doi: 10.22111/ijas.2021.6863
Fahimeh Homayoun; Younes Zare; Siroos Zare. "Stoneworking Techniques at Persepolis from Quarry to the Terrace". نشریه علمی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان, 11, 2, 1400, 125-129. doi: 10.22111/ijas.2021.6863
Homayoun, Fahimeh, Zare, Younes, Zare, Siroos. (1400). 'Stoneworking Techniques at Persepolis from Quarry to the Terrace', نشریه علمی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان, 11(2), pp. 125-129. doi: 10.22111/ijas.2021.6863
Homayoun, Fahimeh, Zare, Younes, Zare, Siroos. Stoneworking Techniques at Persepolis from Quarry to the Terrace. نشریه علمی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان, 1400; 11(2): 125-129. doi: 10.22111/ijas.2021.6863

Stoneworking Techniques at Persepolis from Quarry to the Terrace

Iranian Journal of Archaeological Studies
دوره 11، شماره 2، 2021، صفحه 125-129    اصل مقاله (1.5 M)
نوع مقاله: Review Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/ijas.2021.6863
نویسندگان
Fahimeh Homayoun* ؛ Younes Zare؛ Siroos Zare
Persepolis World Heritage Site, Shiraz, Iran
چکیده
Masonry materials for the colossal monumental structures of Persepolis, the awe-inspiring architectural complex from the Achaemenid period, would be sourced from the surrounding mountains that occasionally lie up to 40 km away. Several techniques were involved in splitting stone from quarry masses. Once split, stonecutters would choose where in the structure and for what purpose each block befitted. At times, impurities were detected in blocks either before splitting or during rough cutting at the quarry site, or after final dressing on the construction site, viz. the Terrace. Apart from those for quarrying, Achaemenian masons applied several other techniques as part of setting, attaching and dressing processes on the construction site. Some blocks bear marks that were made by stonecutters and have thus been categorized as stonecutter’s marks. Yet, there are other related symbols that are instead connected with specific techniques used by masons for setting in place and holding together separate stone blocks. The present work addresses problems the stonecutters had to tackle while selecting blocks for using in the structures on the Terrace, and placing them atop each other during the construction process.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Persepolis؛ Stone Mason؛ Impurity Veins؛ Setting Techniques
مراجع

Schmidt, Erich F. 1953. Persepolis I: Structures,Reliefs, Inscriptions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
 
Amanollahi. Hamid. 2005. A Study of the Diversity of Stones Used in the Persepolis Terrace (Based on Archaeological Studies and Lithological Results), Journal of the Cultural Heritage Research Institute, 1(2): 66‒80.

Nylander, Carl. 1965. Old Persian and Greek Stonecutting and the Chronology of Achaemenian Monuments: Achaemenian Problems I,” American Journal of Archaeology 69(1): 49‒55.

Nylander, Carl. 1970. Ionians in Pasargadae Studies in Old Persian Architecture . Sweden.

Roaf, Michael. 1978. Persepolitan Metrology, Journal of the British Institute of Persian Studies,Iran Volume XVI, London.

Roaf, Michael. 1983. Sculptures and Sculptors at Persepolis. London. 

Shahbazi, A. 2005. Persepolis Documentary Guide.Tehran: Parseh Research Foundation, Passargad. 

Tilia, Ann Britt. 1972. Studies and Restorations at Persepolis and Other Sites of Fars, I, trans. by Karamatollah Afsar. Tehran: Iranian Organization for Conservation of Archaeological Relics.

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 179
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 250


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب