تعداد نشریات | 31 |
تعداد شمارهها | 700 |
تعداد مقالات | 6,843 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 11,199,897 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 7,513,197 |
Polysemy Comprehension in Persian-Speaking Children | ||
Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies | ||
مقاله 3، دوره 14، شماره 2، بهمن 2022، صفحه 31-44 اصل مقاله (537.13 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/ijals.2022.7254 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Parisa Sadat Mirnejad1؛ Arsalan Golfam* 2؛ Hayat Ameri3؛ Sahar Bahrami- Khorshid2 | ||
1Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran | ||
2Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran | ||
3Department of Persian Language Studies, Research Center of Persian Language and Literature, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
This paper aims to study 7 to 12-year-old Persian-speaking children’s comprehension of polysemy through semantics. The research method is descriptive-analytic, and two kinds of methodology in data collection such as documentary resources and fieldwork have been applied. For collecting data, each of the six elementary school grades course books ‘Farsi’ (2018) has been studied and all polysemous words within each of these course books have been extracted. Accordingly, to evaluate polysemy comprehension in children, a multiple-choice test containing two questions was prepared for each grade and asked 25 participants to answer in each grade and each gender from among elementary schools in Tehran. In each grade, 100 answers were received and based on the number of correct answers children’s polysemy comprehension was evaluated. These tests were administered under school authorities’ control and children had to answer in 15 minutes. The results show that most children found the polysemous words without problem only within a context and in relation to the collocated words. Also, children can comprehend the exact meaning of polysemous words based on the encyclopedic viewpoint of meaning which is rooted in human social and physical experience. Moreover, children based on their background knowledge differentiate between multiple meanings of polysemous words. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
polysemy؛ encyclopedic knowledge؛ context؛ semantics | ||
مراجع | ||
Afrashi, A., & Asgari, S. (2017). Polysemy of perception verb ‘to see’ [didan] in Persian: A cognitive and corpus-based study. Iranian Journal of Comparative Linguistic Research, 7(14), 61-73.
Afrashi, A., & Samet Jokandan, S. S. (2013). Systematic polysemy with a cognitive approach of polysemy analysis of sensory verb ‘hearing’ in Persian. Literary Research, 8(30), 29-59.
Azimi, A., & Afrashi, A. (2021). Polysemy of Persian verbs of hearing: A cognitive, corpus-based and diachronic approach. Zabanshenakht, 11(2), 1-29.
Bonvini, E. (2008). About ‘Eating’ in a few Niger-Congo languages. From polysemy to semantic change: Towards a typology of lexical semantic associations, 267-289. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.106.13bon
Carston, R. (2020). Polysemy: Pragmatics and sense conventions. Mind & Language, 36, 108–133. http://doi: 10.1111/mila.12329
Catford, J. C. (2001). A practical introduction to phonetics. Oxford University Press.
Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge University Press.
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
Evans, V. (2009). How words mean. Oxford University Press.
Family, N. (2008). Mapping Semantic Spaces: A constructionist account of the ‘light verb’ xordan ‘eat’ in Persian. From Polysemy to Semantic Change, 139-161. http://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.106.08fam
Fayyazi, M. S. (2008). Looking into the notion of polysemy in Persian: A cognitive approach [Doctoral dissertation]. Tehran, Tarbiat Modares University.
Fenk-Oczlon, G., & Fenk, A. (2010). Frequency effect on the emergence of the polysemy and homophony. International Journal of Information Technologies and knowledge, 4(2), 103-109.
Gandomkar, R. (2016). Polysemy of verb ‘xordan’: A case study of inefficiency of Lexical Typology. Zabanpazhuhi, 10(19), 149-167.
Geeraerts, D. (2010). Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford University Press.
Ghaderi, M., Yousefirad, F., Afrashi, A., & Rovshan, B. (2019). Systematic polysemy in cognitive approach: Studying the polysemy of “see” in Persian. Journal of Western Iranian Languages and Dialects, 7(4), 73-91.
Golfam, A., Afrashi, A., & Moghadam, Gh. (2014). Conceptualization of the Persian simple verbs of motion: A cognitive approach. Research in Western Iranian Languages and Dialects, 1(3), 103-122.
Hurford, J. R., Heasley, B., & Smith, M. B. (2007). Semantics: A course book. Cambridge University Press.
Hesabi, A. (2017). Radial categories of head body parts: A cognitive study. Language Research, 9(24), 87-109.
Imani, A., & Rafiei, A. (2020). A Constructional study of the compounds of body part ‘sar’ (head) in Persian. Zabanpazhuhi, 11(33), 129-159.
Kheirabadi, R., & Kheirabadi, M. (2017). Analysis of lexical relations in Iranian children’s literature. Journal of Children’s Literature Studies, 8(1), 23-44.
Khormaee, A., Moloodi, A., & Kaviyani Fardzadeh, E. (2019). A study of polysemy in four negative non-verbal prefixes in Persian based on principled polysemy: A corpus-based approach. The International of Journal of Humanities, 26(2), 1-86.
Li, H. (2022). Representational development of polysemous words in bilingual mental lexicon: Socio-cognitive perspectives. Journal of Modern Linguistics, 12, 265-274. http://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2022.123020
Lyons, J. (1995). Linguistic semantics. Cambridge University Press.
Murphy, M. L. (2003). Semantic relations and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press.
Paul, H. (1920). Prinzipein der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Niemeyer.
Raftari, M. (2009). A study of sense relations in the writings of the students in grade 2nd, 3rd, 4th &5th in primary school [Master’s thesis]. Az-zahrauniversity.
Rasekh Mahand, M. (2018). An introduction to cognitive linguistics: Theories and concepts. SAMT publication.
Ravin, Y., & Leacock, C. (2000). Polysemy: An overview. Polysemy: Theoretical and computational approaches, Oxford University Press, 1-29.
Research and Educational Programming Organization, Ministry of Education. (2018). Farsi: First to sixth-grade elementary school. Tehran.
Safavi, K. (2004). An introduction to semantics. Sureye Mehr publication.
Safavi, K. (2013). Which meaning?. Language Science, 1(1), 11-40.
Sharifian, F. (2012). Translation and body-part terms: The case of cheshm ‘eye’ in Persian. Language, Culture, and Translation, 1(1), 1-16.
Sinclair, J. (2004). Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. Routledge.
Soltani, R., & Amouzadeh, M. (2018). From heavy to light verb: The case of dAdan ‘to give’ in Persian based on cognitive semantics. Journal of Linguistics and Khorasan Dialects, 10(18), 79-100.
Ullmann, S. (1962). Semantics: An introduction to the study of meaning. Basil Blackwell.
Wei, X., & Lou, Y. (2015), A study of word meaning acquisition of polysemous words for English majors. Creative Education, 6, 1993-2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.618204 | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 252 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 161 |