|تعداد مشاهده مقاله||9,731,227|
|تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله||6,362,724|
Prioritization of the Economic Activities in Yazd Province with an Emphasis on the Importance of Water Resources: Integration of the Input-Output and TOPSIS Models
|International Journal of Business and Development Studies|
|دوره 14، شماره 1، مهر 2022، صفحه 167-183 اصل مقاله (514.57 K)|
|شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/ijbds.2022.7441|
|Zahra Nasrollahi1؛ Farnaz Dehghan Banadkuki2|
|1Associate Professor in Economics, Faculty of Economics, Management and Accounting, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.|
|2M.Sc. Graduated, Environmental Economics, Faculty of Economics, Management & Accounting, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.|
|The purpose of this study is to prioritize the economic activities in Yazd Province, Iran, with a sustainable development approach and an emphasis on the importance of water intensity in economic activities. Therefore, multiple criteria were used to prioritize the activities that cover the economic, social and environmental dimensions of sustainable development. In the first stage, the SFLQ method was used to prepare an input-output table for Yazd Province. Then, the economic activities in the province were prioritized in terms of six criteria including the intensity of interdepartmental communication and value-added (economic dimension), job creation (social dimension) as well as energy intensity, water intensity and pollution (environmental dimension). Moreover, a combination of an input-output model and the TOPSIS method was applied. According to the results of this study, among the activities in the province, "transportation" proved to have the highest priority. It was also found that the ignorance of water use as an important criterion can lead to significantly different prioritization results.|
|Prioritization؛ Economic activities؛ Input-output model؛ TOPSIS model؛ Sustainable development|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
Alvandizadeh, A., nonezad, M., jahangiri, M. (2019). The ranking of investment priority in economic sector of Sistan & Baluchestan province. Regional Planning, 9(35), 73-84.
Asgharpour Moziraji, A., & Sharify, N. (2020). Comparison of Iran National and Provincial Economic Structure Using the Input-Output Approach. QJER. 2020; 20 (4) :125-155.
Banouei, A. A., Ziyaee, Z., & Mohajeri , P. (2020). Quantitative Analysis of Spatial Dimensions of Regional Economic sectors Using New Mixed EFLQ-RAS Method. Quarterly Scintific Journal of Regional Planning, 9(36): 31-48.
Babaei, N., & Jalalifar, B. (2018). An Application of the Input-Output Model to Analyze the Role of the Oil and Gas Sector in the Iranian. Quarterly Journal of Energy Economics, 14(58): 169-195
Chen, S. J. And Hwang, C. L. (1992) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Dehghan Banadkuki, F. (2020). Analysis and measurement of energy consumption in different economic sectors of Yazd province using Input-output table of two regions. (Master Thesis), Faculty of Economics, Management and Accounting, Yazd University
Fatemi, S., Farsad, F., Shariat, S., & babaei, F. (2018). Prioritizing Between Pakdasht Combined Cycle Power Plant And Kahak Wind Power Plant Based On Environmental Criteria. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 20(2): 79-98.
Flegg, A. T., & Tohmo, T. (2016). Estimating Regional Input Coefficients and Multipliers: The Use of FLQ is not a Gamble. Regional Studies, 50(2): 310-325.
Garc´ıa Mu˜niz, A., Morillas Raya, A., & Ramos Carvajal, C. (2008). Key sectors: A new proposal from network theory. Regional Studies, 42 (7): 1013–1030.
Guo, J., Zhang, Y. J., & Zhang, K. B. (2018). The key sectors for energy conservation and carbon emissions reduction in China: evidence from the input-output method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179: 180-190.
Hewings, G. J. D. (1982). The empirical identification of key secors in an economy: A regional perspective. The Developing Economies, 20 (2): 173–195.
Laumas, P. (1975). Key sectors in some underdeveloped countries. Kyklos, 28 (1): 62–79.
Kowalewksi, J. (2015). Regionalization of National Input–Output Tables: Empirical Evidence on the Use of the FLQ Formula. Regional Studies, 49(2): 240-250.
Masoudi, M. B., Moammari, E., & Moammari, F. (2020). Investigation of spatial distribution of indicators of sustainable urban-rural development with emphasis on educational indicators in Golestan province. Journal of Spatial Planning, 34(9): 245-260.
Nasrollahi, Z., & Zarei , M. (2017). Prioritization of Industrial Activities in Yazd Province with an Emphasis on the Importance of Water Resources: Integrating the Input-Output Model and AHP. Iranian Journal of Economic Research, 22(71): 27-64.
Pavlović, B., Ivezić, D., & Živković, M. (2021). A multi-criteria approach for assessing the potential of renewable energy sources for electricity generation: Case Serbia. Energy Reports
Rasmussen, P. N. (1956). Studies in inter-sectoral relations. E. Harck, Copenhagen.
Schultz, S. (1977). Approaches to identifying key sectors empirically by means of input-output analysis. The Journal of Development Studies, 14 (1): 77–96.
shirzouraliabadi, Z. (2021). Prioritization of spatial economic activities to enhance sustainable rural development (Case study: villages of Quchan County). Village and Space Sustainable Development, 1(4): 35-46.
Solangi, Y. A., Tan, Q., Mirjat, N. H., & Ali, S (2019). Evaluating the strategies for sustainable energy planning in Pakistan: An integrated SWOT-AHP and Fuzzy-TOPSIS approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236: 117655.
21-Yoon, K.p. & Hwang, C.L. (1995). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Zhao, X., & Choi, S. G (2015). On the Regionalization of Input–Output Tables with an Industry-Specific Location Quotient. The Annals of Regional Science. 54(3): 901-926.
Zhao, X., Chen, B. & Yang, Z.F. (2009). National Water Footprint in an Input-Output Framework - a Case Study of China 2002. Ecological Modelling, 220(2): 245-253.
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 53
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 88