سنجش تحقق کاربری اراضی طرح‌‌های توسعه و عمران (جامع) شهر مشهد با استفاده از روش ارزیابی انطباق‌محور مبتنی بر مکان

Alexander, E. R (2006a). Dilemmas in evaluating planning, or back to basics: What is planning for? Paper presented at the second World Planning Schools Congress, Mexico City.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14649350902884177

Alexander, E. R (2006b). Evolution and status: Where is planning evaluation today and how did it get here? In Evaluation in planning: Evolution and prospects, ed. Ernest R. Alexander, 3-16. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=AYQGDAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA3&dq=and+status:+Where+is+planning+evaluation+today+and+how+did+it+get+here%3F+In+Evaluation+in+planning:+Evolution+and+prospects&ots=g3CrIByJ51&sig=1epNCFYyrh8FtlOADQ1fGcnslM4#v=onepage&q=and%20status%3A%20Where%20is%20planning%20evaluation%20today%20and%20how%20did%20it%20get%20here%3F%20In%20Evaluation%20in%20planning%3A%20Evolution%20and%20prospects&f=false

Alexander, E. R (2000). Rationality revisited: Planning paradigms in a post-postmodernist perspective. Journal of Planning Education and Research 19 (3): 242-56.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0739456x0001900303

Alexander, Ernest R (1998). Evaluation in Israeli spatial planning. In Evaluation in planning: Facing the challenge of complexity, ed. Nathaniel Lichfield, Angela Barbanente, Dino Borri, Abdul Khakee, and Anna Prat, 299-310. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-017-1495-2_15

Alexander, Ernest R., and Andreas Faludi (1989). Planning and plan implementation: Notes on evaluation criteria. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design 16 (1): 127-40.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/b160127

Alterman, Rachel, and Morris Hill (1978). Implementation of urban land use plans. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 33 (1): 274-85.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01944367808976905

Baer, William C (1997). General plan evaluation criteria. Journal of the American Planning Association 63 (3): 329-44.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01944369708975926

Barrett, S., & Fudge, C (1981). Policy and action: essays on the implementation of public policy.

https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:733076

Bakır, N. Y., Doğan, U., Güngör, M. K., & Bostancı, B (2018). Planned development versus unplanned change: The effects on urban planning in Turkey. Land Use Policy, 77, 310-321.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837717307895

Brody, S. D., Highfield, W. E., & Thornton, S (2006). Planning at the urban fringe: An examination of the factors influencing nonconforming development patterns in southern Florida. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33(1), 75-96.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/b31093

Brody, S. D., & Highfield, W. E (2005). Does planning work?: Testing the implementation of local environmental planning in Florida. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 159-175.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01944360508976690

Brown, G., Kyttä, M., & Reed, P (2022). Using community surveys with participatory mapping to monitor comprehensive plan implementation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 218, 104306.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204621002693

Burby, R. J (2003). Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(1), 33-49.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01944360308976292

Calkins, H. W (1979). The planning monitor: an accountability theory of plan evaluation. Environment and planning A, 11(7), 745-758.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/a110745

Carmona, M., & Sieh, L (2005). Performance measurement innovation in English planning authorities. Planning Theory & Practice, 6(3), 303-333.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14649350500208944

Chakraborti, S., Das, D. N., Mondal, B., Shafizadeh-Moghadam, H., & Feng, Y (2018). A neural network and landscape metrics to propose a flexible urban growth boundary: A case study. Ecological indicators, 93, 952-965.

 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1470160X18303777

Chapin, T. S., Deyle, R. E., & Baker, E. J (2008). A parcel-based GIS method for evaluating conformance of local land-use planning with a state mandate to reduce exposure to hurricane flooding. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35(2), 261-279.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/b32114

Dadashpoor, H., & Heydari, M (2022). Schools of urban and regional planning evaluation: A genealogical perspective. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 10(3), 302-320.

https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/irspsd/10/3/10_302/_article/-char/ja/

Dempsey, J. A., & Plantinga, A. J (2013). How well do urban growth boundaries contain development? Results for Oregon using a difference-in-difference estimator.Regional Science and Urban Economics,43(6),996-1007.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0166046213000914

Van Damme, L., Galle, M., Pen-Soetermeer, M., & Verdaas, K (1997). Improving the performance of local land-use plans. Environment and planning B: Planning and Design, 24(6), 833-844.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/b240833

Driessen, P (1997). Performance and implementing institutions in rural land development. Environment and planning B: Planning and Design, 24(6), 859-869.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/b240859

Europejska, K (1999). MEANS Collection: Evaluating Socio, economic programmes, t. 1 6. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=MEANS+collection%E2%80%94Evaluating+socio-economic+programmes&btnG=

Faludi, A (1989). Conformance vs. performance: Implications for evaluation. Impact Assessment, 7(2-3), 135-151.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/07349165.1989.9726017

Faludi, A (2000). The performance of spatial planning. Planning practice and Research, 15(4), 299-318.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/713691907

Faludi, A (2006). Evaluating plans: The application of the European spatial development perspective. Evaluation in planning: Evolution and prospects, 119-143.

https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=AYQGDAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA119&dq=Evaluating+plans:+The+application+of+the+European+spatial+development+perspective&ots=g3CrICpK63&sig=oiPuCijqejolV5-M96WS8yz-VJU#v=onepage&q=Evaluating%20plans%3A%20The%20application%20of%20the%20European%20spatial%20development%20perspective&f=false

Forester, J (1982). Planning in the Face of Power. Journal of the American planning association, 48(1), 67-80.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01944368208976167

Feitelson, E., Felsenstein, D., Razin, E., & Stern, E (2017). Assessing land use plan implementation: Bridging the performance-conformance divide. Land Use Policy, 61, 251-264.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837716304550

Gkotsis, T (2014). Cataraqui North, A Case Study: Kingston’s Experience with the Implementation of New Urbanist Secondary Plan. http://qspace.library.queensu.ca/handle/1974/12128

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage.

https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=k_zxEUst46UC&oi=fnd&pg=PA20&dq=Fourth+generation+evaluation.+Newbury+Park&ots=_-59pndOGV&sig=5MMIMVsKoWNHaqB2oCfHHhf78zs#v=onepage&q=Fourth%20generation%20evaluation.%20Newbury%20Park&f=false

Healey, P (1996). The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and design, 23(2), 217-234.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/b230217

Innes, J. E (1995). Planning theory's emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of planning education and research, 14(3), 183-189.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0739456x9501400307

Khakee, A (1998). Evaluation and planning: inseparable concepts. The town planning review, 359-374.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/40113511

Khakee, A (2003). The emerging gap between evaluation research and practice. Evaluation, 9(3), 340-352.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/13563890030093007

De Lange, M., Mastop, H., & Spit, T (1997). Performance of national policies. Environment and planning B: Planning and Design, 24(6), 845-858.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/b240845

Laurian, L., Day, M., Backhurst, M., Berke, P., Ericksen, N., Crawford, J., ... & Chapman, S (2004a). What drives plan implementation? Plans, planning agencies and developers. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47(4), 555-577.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0964056042000243230

Laurian, L., Day, M., Berke, P., Ericksen, N., Backhurst, M., Crawford, J., & Dixon, J (2004b). Evaluating plan implementation: A conformance-based methodology. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(4), 471-480.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01944360408976395

Li, G., Wang, L., Wu, C., Xu, Z., Zhuo, Y., & Shen, X (2022). Spatial Planning Implementation Effectiveness: Review and Research Prospects. Land, 11(8), 1279.

https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1279

Lichfield, N (1998). Trends in planning evaluation: A British perspective. GeoJournal Library (Netherlands).

https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=NL1999003198

Loh, C. G (2011). Assessing and interpreting non-conformance in land-use planning implementation. Planning Practice and Research, 26(3), 271-287.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02697459.2011.580111

Lyles, W., Berke, P., & Smith, G (2016). Local plan implementation: Assessing conformance and influence of local plans in the United States. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43(2), 381-400.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0265813515604071

Mastop, H (1997). Performance in Dutch spatial planning: an introduction. Environment and planning B: Planning and Design, 24(6), 807-813.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/b240807

Mastop, H., & Faludi, A (1997). Evaluation of strategic plans: the performance principle. Environment and Planning B: Planning and design, 24(6), 815-832.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/b240815

Mastop, H., & Needham, B (1997). Performance studies in spatial planning: the state of the art. Environment and planning B: planning and design, 24(6), 881-888.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/b240881

Norton, R. K (2005). More and better local planning: State-mandated local planning in coastal North Carolina. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(1), 55-71.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01944360508976405

Oliveira, V., & Pinho, P (2010). Evaluation in urban planning: Advances and prospects. Journal of Planning Literature, 24(4), 343-361.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0885412210364589

Pelorosso, R (2020). Modeling and urban planning: A systematic review of performance-based approaches. Sustainable cities and society, 52, 101867.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2210670719316968

Sager, T (1994). Communicative planning theory. Avebury.

https://books.google.com/books/about/Communicative_Planning_Theory.html?id=tDJvQgAACAAJ

Seasons, M (2003a). Indicators and core area planning: applications in Canada's mid-sized cities. Planning Practice & Research, 18(1), 63-80.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0269745032000132646?journalCode=cppr20

Seasons, Mark L (2003b). Monitoring and evaluation in municipal planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 69 (4): 430-440.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01944360308976329

Shahab, S., Clinch, J. P., & O’Neill, E (2019). Impact-based planning evaluation: Advancing normative criteria for policy analysis. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(3), 534-550.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2399808317720446?journalCode=epbb

Shen, X., Wang, X., Zhang, Z., & Fei, L (2021). Does non-conforming urban development mean the failure of zoning? A framework for conformance-based evaluation. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 48(5), 1279-1295.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2399808320926179

Shen, X., Wang, X., Zhang, Z., Lu, Z., & Lv, T (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of land use plans in containing urban expansion: An integrated view. Land Use Policy, 80, 205-213.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837718308196

Talen, E (1996a). After the plans: Methods to evaluate the implementation success of plans. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 16(2), 79-91.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0739456x9601600201

Talen, E (1996). Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning. Journal of planning literature, 10(3), 248-259.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/088541229601000302

Voogd, H (1998). The communicative ideology and ex ante planning evaluation. In Evaluation in Planning (113-126). Springer, Dordrecht.

  https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-017-1495-2_6

Vyn, R. J (2012). Examining for evidence of the leapfrog effect in the context of strict agricultural zoning. Land Economics, 88(3), 457-477.

http://le.uwpress.org/content/88/3/457.short