اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 33 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 775 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,506 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,573,276 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,511,478 |
A Minimalist Analysis of Persian Restrictive Relative Clause Derivation | ||
| Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies | ||
| دوره 15، شماره 2، آذر 2023، صفحه 49-68 اصل مقاله (455.09 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/ijals.2023.44473.2325 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Abbas Ali Ahangar* ؛ Seyedeh Zohreh Aftabi | ||
| Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Within the Minimalist Program (MP), Relative clauses (RCs) are considered complementizer clauses (CPs) containing a C with an edge feature [EF] in the form of [wh] and [EPP] but no tense feature. This study investigates Persian RC derivation based on MP. By proposing two approaches, namely: (1) ‘ke-movement’ and (2) ‘null wh-operator (OP) movement’, we will consistently argue and show that the null wh-OP approach provides an appropriate generalization for Persian restrictive RCs. Adopting the latter, the results display Persian RCs can be analyzed as CPs with a null wh-OP assuming to undertake wh-movement as copying and deletion from different syntactic positions, i.e., subject, direct object, object of preposition, etc. This operator allows a small pro in the subject position, leaving an optional null copy, either allowing an optional resumptive pronoun (RP) behind in direct object position or attaching to the verb; and obligatorily in indirect object and object of preposition positions as well as Ezafe-construction. Also, the edge feature of the probe, the complementizer ke, attracts the null wh-OP to Spec-C, for checking and valuing the unvalued [wh] and [EPP] features. The long relative clause derivations can, correspondingly, work as expected by the successive cyclic movement of OP through intermediate Spec-C positions as well. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Minimalist program؛ restrictive relative clauses؛ null wh-operator؛ resumptive pronouns؛ Persian | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adger, D. (2002). Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford University Press.
Ahangar, A. A. (2000). The subordinate clause construction in Persian based on government and binding theory [Doctoral dissertation, Tehran University]. Iran.
Alexopoulou, T. (2006). Resumption in relative clauses. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 24(57). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-005-0898-2
Asudeh, A. (2005). Relational nouns, pronouns, and resumption. Linguistics and Philosophy, 28(4), pp. 375–446.
Carnie, A. (2013) Syntax: A generative introduction (3rd edition). Wiley-Blackwell.
Chomsky, N. (1977). On Wh movement. In P. Cullicover, T. Wasow, & A. Akmajian (Eds.), Formal syntax (pp. 71-132). Academic Press.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Foris Publications.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1998). Minimalist inquiries: The framework, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics,15 (also published in R. Martin, D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka (Eds.) Step by Step: Essays on Minimalism in Honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89-155). MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1999). Derivation by phase, MIT occasional papers in linguistics, 18. (also published in M. Kenstowicz (Ed.) (2001) Ken Hale: A life in language (pp.1- 52). MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Martin, R., Michaels, D. & Uriagereka, J. (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89-155). MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1-52). MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2005). On Phases [Unpublished paper], MIT (to appear in R. Freidin, C. P. Otero and M. L. Zubizaretta (Eds.) Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2006). Approaching UG from below [Unpublished paper]. MIT.
Comrie, B. (1991). Language universals and linguistic typology. University of Chicago Press.
Dabir-Moghaddam, M. (2006). Studies in Persian linguistics: Selected articles. Iran University Press.
Gren-Eklund, G. (1978). A Study of nominal sentences in the oldest upaniṣads. Studia Indoeuropaea Upsaliensia, 3, the University of California.
Ghomeshi, J. (1997). Non-projecting nouns and the ezafe: Construction in Persian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 15(4), 729-788.
Hojatollah Taleghani, A. (2008). The modality, aspect and negation in Persian. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Karimi, S. (1989). Aspects of Persian syntax, specifity, and the theory of grammar [Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington.
Karimi, S. (1994). Word order variations in modern contemporary Persian. In M. Marashi (Ed.). Persian studies in North America: A Festschrift for Professor M.A. Jazayery (pp. 43-73). Iranbooks.
Karimi, S. (2001). Persian complex DPs: How mysterious are they?. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, (46), 63-96.
Karimi, S., & Hojatollah Taleghani, A. (2007). Wh-movement, interpretation, and optionality in Persian. In S. Karimi, V. Samiian & W. Wilkins (Eds.), Clausal and phrasal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation (pp. 167-187). John Benjamins Publishing.
Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. MIT Press (=Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 25).
Keenan, E. (1985). Relative Clauses. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (Vol. 2, pp. 141-170). Cambridge University Press.
Keenan, E., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 62–100.
Koopman, H., & Sportiche, D. (1991). The position of subjects. Lingua, 85, 211 58.
Miremadi, S. A. (1997). Persian syntax (A GB-Based Analysis). Samt Publications.
Modarresi, B., & Zoqi, N. (2016), Determiner phrase based on minimalism in Persian. Language Related Research, 7(2).
Nikolaeva, I. (2006). Relative clauses. In K. Brown (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. (2nd ed., 501–508). Elsevier.
Pesetsky, D. (1997). Optimality theory and syntax: Movement and pronunciation. Optimality theory: An overview. Blackwell, Oxford.
Radford, A. (2009). Analyzing English sentences, a minimalist approach. Cambridge University Press, University of Essex.
Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax [Doctoral dissertation, MIT]. Published as Infinite Syntax! by Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ, 1986.
Samiian, V. (1983). Origins of phrasal categories in Persian, an X-bar [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of California, LA.
Sells, P. (1984). Syntax and semantics of resumptive pronouns [Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachussetts at Amherst].
Shlonsky, Ur. (1992). Resumptive pronouns as a last resort. Linguistic Inquiry, 23(3), 443-468.
Taghavipour, M. (2004). An HPSG analysis of Persian relative clauses. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on headdriven phrase structure grammar, center for computational linguistics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Taghavipour, M. (2005). Persian relative clauses in head–driven phrase structure grammar [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Essex. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 197 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 234 |
||