
تعداد نشریات | 32 |
تعداد شمارهها | 749 |
تعداد مقالات | 7,266 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 11,991,099 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,173,244 |
توسعه فناوریِ حاکمیت ابری مبتنی بر روش کیفیِ ترکیب تئوریهای پایه | ||
پژوهش های مدیریت عمومی | ||
مقاله 3، دوره 17، شماره 64، تیر 1403، صفحه 69-100 اصل مقاله (2.03 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/jmr.2022.41237.5708 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
مصطفی تمتاجی* 1؛ محمدرضا تقوا2 | ||
1عضو هیئت علمی دانشکده مدیریت راهبردی و مهندسی صنایع، دانشگاه صنعتی مالک اشتر، تهران، ایران. | ||
2استاد دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران. | ||
چکیده | ||
حاکمیت فناوری اطلاعات با تبیین ساختارها، فرایندها و ذینفعان، یک قابلیت سازمانی برای همراستایی راهبردی فناوری اطلاعات برای سازمان فراهم میکند. توسعه این قابلیت در محیط پیچیدهترِ رایانش ابری و برای هر یک از بازیگران این زیستبوم، ضرورت بیشتری دارد. توسعه چارچوب حاکمیت فناوری اطلاعات مبتنی بر تئوریهای حاکمیتی متناسب با محیط سازمان، میزان موفقیت این چارچوب در تحقق رویکرد شراکت راهبردی فناوری اطلاعات با کسب و کار را به میزان قابل توجهی افزایش داده و یک فناوری پایه برای استقرار فرایندهای مورد نیاز برای تحقق حداکثری اهداف سازمان فراهم میسازد. در مقاله حاضر، با تعیین و تحلیل تئوریهای پایه حاکمیت فناوری اطلاعات و حاکمیت رایانش ابری، و با روش تحقیق کیفی گروه کانونی با استفاده از نظرات مدیران سازمانهای فعال در حوزه فناوری اطلاعات، تئوریهای ذینفعان و هزینه-تراکنش به عنوان تئوریهای پایه حاکمیت فناوری اطلاعات در سازمانهای بهرهبردار از منابع رایانشی ابری انتخاب شده و سپس با استفاده از روش کیفی ترکیب تئوریها و مبتنی بر مشارکت همه ذینفعان (تئوری ذینفعان) و رویکرد منابع-مخاطرات(تئوری هزینه-تراکنش)، تئوری حاکمیتی پایه ترکیبی، توسعه یافته است.نتایج بدست آمده، یک تئوری حاکمیتی ترکیبی توسعه یافته، مبتنی بر 51 نیاز از نه ذینفع را نمایش میدهد که برآوردهسازی 30 نیاز منطبق بر رویکرد منابع-مخاطرات را در قالب 16 فرایند حاکمیتی تضمین مینماید و مبنای نوآورانهای از بکارگیری تئوریهای پایه در توسعه فناوریِ سازمانافزاری حاکمیت فناوری اطلاعات در محیط ابری است. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
حاکمیت فناوری اطلاعات؛ رایانش ابری؛ تئوری حاکمیتی؛ توسعه تئوری | ||
مراجع | ||
Refreanses
Ali, S., Green, P., & Robb, A. (2015). Information technology investment governance: What is it and does it matter? International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 18, 1-25.
Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2016). Handbook on theories of governance: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Aral, S., & Weill, P. (2007). IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organization science, 18(5), 763-780.
Aubert, B. A., Rivard, S., & Patry, M. (2004). A transaction cost model of IT outsourcing. Information & management, 41(7), 921-932.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
Barney, J. B. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of management review, 26(1), 41-56.
Barney, J. B., Ketchen Jr, D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). The future of resource-based theory: revitalization or decline? Journal of management, 37(5), 1299-1315.
Biesenthal, C., & Wilden, R. (2014). Multi-level project governance: Trends and opportunities. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1291-1308.
Bin-Abbas, H., & Bakry, S. H. (2014). Assessment of IT governance in organizations: A simple integrated approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 261-267.
Bouaynaya, W. (2019). Characterization of cloud computing reversibility as explored by the DELPHI method. Information Systems Frontiers, 1-14.
Brown, W. C. (2006). IT governance, architectural competency, and the Vasa. Information management & computer security.
Cao, L., Mohan, K., Ramesh, B., & Sarkar, S. (2013). Evolution of governance: achieving ambidexterity in IT outsourcing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(3), 11.
Cao, L., Mohan, K., Ramesh, B., & Sarkar, S. (2013). Evolution of governance: achieving ambidexterity in IT outsourcing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(3), 115-140.
Cao, Z., & Lumineau, F. (2015). Revisiting the interplay between contractual and relational governance: A qualitative and meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 33, 15-42.
Cao, Z., & Lumineau, F. (2015). Revisiting the interplay between contractual and relational governance: A qualitative and meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 33, 15-42.
Chi, M., Zhao, J., George, J. F., Li, Y., & Zhai, S. (2017). The influence of inter-firm IT governance strategies on relational performance: The moderation effect of information technology ambidexterity. International Journal of Information Management, 37(2), 43-53.
Darmawan, D. Z. (2017). IT governance evaluation on educational institutions based on COBIT 5.0 framework. Paper presented at the New Media Studies (CONMEDIA), 2017 4th International Conference on.
Dawson, G. S., Denford, J. S., Williams, C. K., Preston, D., & Desouza, K. C. (2016). An examination of effective IT governance in the public sector using the legal view of agency theory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33(4), 1180-1208.
De Haes, S., & Van Grembergen, W. (2009). An exploratory study into IT governance implementations and its impact on business/IT alignment. Information Systems Management, 26(2), 123-137.
Debreceny, R. S., & Gray, G. L. (2013). IT governance and process maturity: A multinational field study. Journal of Information Systems, 27(1), 157-188.
Deng, C.-P., Mao, J.-Y., & Wang, G.-S. (2013). An empirical study on the source of vendors’ relational performance in offshore information systems outsourcing. International Journal of Information Management, 33(1), 10-19.
Duncan, B., Zhao, Y., & Whittington, M. (2017). Corporate Governance, Risk Appetite and Cloud Security Risk: A Little Known Paradox. How Do We Square the Circle? Paper presented at the Eighth International Conference on Cloud Computing, GRIDs, and Virtualization (CLOUD COMPUTING 2017).
Feeny, D. F., & Willcocks, L. P. (1998). Core IS capabilities for exploiting information technology. Sloan management review, 39(3), 9-21.
Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business ethics quarterly, 409-421.
Furht, B., & Armando, E. (2010). Handbook of cloud computing. In: Springer.
Furuncu, E., & Sogukpinar, I. (2015). Scalable risk assessment method for cloud computing using game theory (CCRAM). Computer Standards & Interfaces, 38, 44-50.
Gray, R., Owen, D. and Adams, C., Eds. (1996). Accounting and Accountability: Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting. Prentice-Hall, London.
Gunupudi, L. (2013). Transaction Cost Economics Of Cloud Computing Adoption.
Gwillim, D., Dovey, K., & Wieder, B. (2005). The politics of post‐implementation reviews. Information Systems Journal, 15(4), 307-319.
Hardy, G. (2006). Using IT governance and COBIT to deliver value with IT and respond to legal, regulatory and compliance challenges. Information Security Technical Report, 11(1), 55-61.
Haselmann, T., & Lipsky, S. (2012). A Case for Cooperative Cloud Intermediaries for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Paper presented at the Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik.
Institute, I. G. (2011). About IT Governance (Published electronically).
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, J.-C., & Groen, A. J. (2010). The resource-based view: a review and assessment of its critiques. Journal of management, 36(1), 349-372.
Marnewick, C., & Labuschagne, L. (2011). An investigation into the governance of information technology projects in South Africa. International Journal of Project Management, 29(6), 661-670.
Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS quarterly, 28(2), 283-322.
Nevo, S., & Wade, M. R. (2010). The formation and value of IT-enabled resources: antecedents and consequences of synergistic relationships. MIS quarterly, 163-183.
Pallas, F. (2014). An agency perspective to cloud computing. Paper presented at the International Conference on Grid Economics and Business Models.
Patón-Romero, J. D., Baldassarre, M. T., Rodríguez, M., Runeson, P., Höst, M., & Piattini, M. (2020). Governance and Management of Green IT: A Multi-Case Study. Information and Software Technology, 106414.
Posthumus, S., & von Solms, R. (2008). Agency Theory: Can it be Used to Strengthen IT Governance? Paper presented at the IFIP International Information Security Conference.
Prasad, A., Green, P., & Heales, J. (2014). On governance structures for the cloud computing services and assessing their effectiveness. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 15(4), 335-356.
Rajendran, S. (2013). Organizational challenges in cloud adoption and enablers of cloud transition program. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
RightScale, I. (2018). RightScale 2018 State of the Cloud Report; Data To Navigate Your Multi-Cloud Strategy.
Rubino, M., & Vitolla, F. (2014). Corporate governance and the information system: how a framework for IT governance supports ERM. Corporate Governance, 14(3), 320-338.
Saidah, A. S., & Abdelbaki, N. (2014). A New Cloud Computing Governance Framework. Paper presented at the CLOSER.
Schniederjans, D. G., & Hales, D. N. (2016). Cloud computing and its impact on economic and environmental performance: A transaction cost economics perspective. Decision Support Systems, 86, 73-82.
Selig, G. J. (2018). It Governance—An Integrated Framework and Roadmap: How to Plan, Deploy and Sustain for Competitive Advantage. Paper presented at the 2018 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET).
Simonsson, M., Johnson, P., & Ekstedt, M. (2010). The effect of IT governance maturity on IT governance performance. Information systems management, 27(1), 10-24.
Siregar, S., & Rustamaji, E. (2017). Determining evaluated domain process through problem identification using COBIT 5 framework. Paper presented at the Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), 2017 5th International Conference on.
Sirisomboonsuk, P., Gu, V. C., Cao, R. Q., & Burns, J. R. (2018). Relationships between project governance and information technology governance and their impact on project performance. International Journal of Project Management, 36(2), 287-300.
Ştefănescu, M. V. (2015). The information technology role in the dynamics and evolution of SMEs in Timis County, Romania. Procedia Economics Finance, 32, 1107-1113.
Symons, C. (2005). IT governance framework. FOrrester research.
Tarafdar, M., & Gordon, S. R. (2007). Understanding the influence of information systems competencies on process innovation: A resource-based view. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16(4), 353-392.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Tonelli, A. O., de Souza Bermejo, P. H., Dos Santos, P. A., Zuppo, L., & Zambalde, A. L. (2017). It governance in the public sector: a conceptual model. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(3), 593-610.
Viniegra, C. (2012). Keep It Simple! Framing Cloud Computing with Agency Theory. The Journal of Information Technology Management.
Vyas, L. (2018). Gaps and Transparency Challenges in Contract Outsourcing. Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance.
Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004). The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS quarterly,28(1), 107-142.
Walterbusch, M., Martens, B., & Teuteberg, F. (2015). A decision model for the evaluation and selection of cloud computing services: a first step towards a more sustainable perspective. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 14(02), 253-285.
Wiengarten, F., Humphreys, P., Cao, G., & McHugh, M. (2013). Exploring the important role of organizational factors in IT business value: Taking a contingency perspective on the resource‐based view. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 30-46.
Wiengarten, F., Humphreys, P., Cao, G., & McHugh, M. (2013). Exploring the important role of organizational factors in IT business value: Taking a contingency perspective on the resource‐based view. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 30-46.
Wilkin, C. L., Couchman, P. K., Sohal, A., & Zutshi, A. (2016). Exploring differences between smaller and large organizations' corporate governance of information technology. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 22, 25-6.
Williamson, O. E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance: Oxford University Press.
Yassine Bounagui, I., Hatim Hafiddi, I., & Abdellatif Mezrioui, I. (2016). COBIT Evaluation as a Framework for Cloud Computing Governance.
Yigitbasioglu, O. (2014). Modelling the intention to adopt cloud computing services: a transaction cost theory perspective. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 18(3), 193-210.
Yusoff, W. F. W., & Alhaji, I. A. (2012). Insight of corporate governance theories. Journal of Business & Management, 1(1), 52-63. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 318 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 295 |