اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 33 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 776 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,518 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 12,636,809 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,530,552 |
Archaeology of Liberation vs. Political Archaeology: Rethinking the Past for a Just Future | ||
| Iranian Journal of Archaeological Studies | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 14، شماره 1، 2024، صفحه 81-86 اصل مقاله (322.38 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Review Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/ijas.2024.50018.1317 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Mehdi Mortazavi* | ||
| Department of Archaeology and Archaeological Sciences Research Centre, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Political archaeology and archaeology of liberation are two of several different aspects of the relationship between archaeology and politics. In this note, I will examine political archaeology from the aspect of its negative effects, and I will examine archaeology of liberation from the aspect of its positive effects, although each may have other benefits and harms. This means I do not intend to praise one and blame the other. Rather, I will express the most common methods that can strengthen the negative and positive aspects. For example, just as political archaeology has a negative aspect, it is possible that liberating archaeology may also show negative aspects in case of inaccuracy. Political archaeology, the intersection of politics and archaeological research, reveals how political motives can shape historical interpretations. By examining the subjective nature of historical understanding and how human perception influences our understanding of the past, we can recognize how archaeology can be manipulated by various individuals, including politicians, for political gain. Archaeology of liberation, a related field, offers a potential solution to the challenges posed by political archaeology. By centreing the voices and experiences of marginalized communities, archaeology of liberation can help to counter the biased narratives often perpetuated by political agendas. By working collaboratively with these communities, archaeologists can develop more inclusive and equitable interpretations of the past. By understanding both political archaeology and archaeology of liberation, we can gain a more comprehensive understanding of how archaeology can be used to both uphold and challenge power structures. Through a critical examination of political archaeology and a commitment to the principles of liberation archaeology, we can work towards a more just and equitable future. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Archaeology of Liberation؛ Political Archaeology؛ Anti-Colonial؛ Indigenous؛ Marginalized Communities؛ Ethics | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ellis, L. 2003. Archaeological Method and Theory: an Encyclopedia. London and New York: Routledge,Taylor and Francis Group.
Fiskesjö, M. 2010. Global Repatriation and “Universal” Museums. Anthropology News 51(3):10-12 https://doi.org/10-12.10.1111j.1556-3502.2010.51310.x.
Johnson, M. 2019. Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. Third Edition. New York: John Willey & Sons, Inc.
Jordan, K. A. 2009a. Colonies, Colonialism, and Cultural Entanglement: The Archaeology of Postcolumbian Intercultural Relations. In T. Majewski & D. Gaimster, (eds.) , International Handbook of Historical Archaeology. New York: Springer, 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72071-5_3
Jordan, K. A. 2009b. Regional Diversity and Colonialism in Eighteenth Century Iroquoia. In L.E. Miroff & T.D. Knapp, (eds.), Iroquoian Archaeology and Analytic Scale. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 215–230.
Mortazavi, M. 2010. Irresponsibility in Archaeology. Estonian Journal of Archaeology 14 (2): 143-152. https://doi.org/10.3176/arch.2010.2.03
Mortazavi, M. 2018. Uncertainty in Iranian Archaeology. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Mumbai 91 (1): 1-14
Mortazavi, M, F. Mosapour Negari & G. Haddadi Nasab. 2024. Political Archaeology of the Middle East. Zahedan: University of Sistan and Baluchestan Press.
Oestigaard, T. 2002. Political Archaeology and Holy Nationalism: Archaeological Battles Over the Bible and Land in Israel and Palestine from 1967-2000. London: Pluto Press.
Pluciennik, M. 1998. Archaeology, Archaeologists and‘Europe’.Antiquity72(278):816-824.https://doi.org/10,1017/S0003598X0008747X
Young, M. 2002. The Nazis Archaeology. Nebraska Anthropologist 17: 29 – 35.
Swanepoel, N. 2009. The Practice and Substance of Historical Archaeology in Sub-Saharan Africa. In T. Majewski & D. Gaimster,(eds.), International Handbook of Historical Archaeology. New York: Springer, 565-583
Zimmerman, L. 2006. Liberating Archaeology, Liberation Archaeologies, and WAC. Archaeologies 2.85-97.https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11759-006-0009-y. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 331 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 313 |
||