دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات33
تعداد شماره‌ها770
تعداد مقالات7,474
تعداد مشاهده مقاله12,460,335
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله8,475,106
Tohidyan Far, Somayeh, Rezaei-Moghaddam, Kurosh, Dallago, Bruno. (1403). The governance models of universities: The case of Iran. نشریه علمی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان, 16(2), 49-69. doi: 10.22111/ijbds.2024.49427.2136
Somayeh Tohidyan Far; Kurosh Rezaei-Moghaddam; Bruno Dallago. "The governance models of universities: The case of Iran". نشریه علمی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان, 16, 2, 1403, 49-69. doi: 10.22111/ijbds.2024.49427.2136
Tohidyan Far, Somayeh, Rezaei-Moghaddam, Kurosh, Dallago, Bruno. (1403). 'The governance models of universities: The case of Iran', نشریه علمی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان, 16(2), pp. 49-69. doi: 10.22111/ijbds.2024.49427.2136
Tohidyan Far, Somayeh, Rezaei-Moghaddam, Kurosh, Dallago, Bruno. The governance models of universities: The case of Iran. نشریه علمی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان, 1403; 16(2): 49-69. doi: 10.22111/ijbds.2024.49427.2136

The governance models of universities: The case of Iran

International Journal of Business and Development Studies
مقاله 3، دوره 16، شماره 2، اسفند 2024، صفحه 49-69    اصل مقاله (496.09 K)
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/ijbds.2024.49427.2136
نویسندگان
Somayeh Tohidyan Far1؛ Kurosh Rezaei-Moghaddam* 2؛ Bruno Dallago3
1Former Ph.D. student of Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Shiraz University
2Professor of Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Iran. E-mail: rezaei@shirazu.ac.ir.
3Professor of Department of Economics and Management, University of Trento, Italy. E-mail: bruno.dallago@unitn.it.
چکیده
Objective: Due to the importance of the relationship between the state and the university, which indicates the governance model of the university, this paper first determined the characteristics of the different models of university governance and then examined and identified the models of governance of Iranian universities during six development plans. We considered three governance models (state-centered model, Humboldt model, market-oriented model).

Methods: Quantitative content analysis was used in order to evaluate the six development plans of Iran regarding different governance model.

Results: The results show that the most frequencies for state-centered model presented in the first Development Plan and the most emphasis of Humboldt model was on the fifth Plan. The component frequency of the market-oriented or entrepreneurial governance dimensions in the Iranian development plans indicates that this model was considered for the first time in the third plan and the emphasis on this model in the development plans shows an increasing trend.

Conclusions: The estimation of the weighting indicators showed that the emphasis of the development plans on turning to the market-oriented or entrepreneurial model in decision making is increasing, so we suggest that more researcher in their study consider transition toward third-generation universities in Iran as a developing country.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Governance models؛ State-centered model؛ Humboldt model؛ Market-oriented model
مراجع
  1. Altbach, P., & Salmi, J. (Eds) (2011). The road to academic excellence: The making of world-class research universities. Washington DC: World Bank.
  2. Arnaut, D. (2010). Towards an entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Euro-Mediterranean studies, 3(1), 135-152.
  3. Amini Sabegh, Z., Redaei, H., & Sadeh, E. (2019). Explaining the theory of youth social responsibility in the statement of the second step of the Islamic Revolution with emphasis on good governance. Business Management Quarterly, 34 (11), 134-157.
  4. Azar, A. (2001). Extending and developing the Shannon entropy for data process in content analysis. Journal of Humanities, 11(37-38), 1-18.
  5. Bagheri, A., & Karimov, M. (2013). A critical analysis of the historical process of higher education in Iran. Cultural Community Studies. Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 4(1), 23-57.
  6. Bieber, T. (2010). Playing the Multilevel Game in Education—the PISA Study and the Bologna Process Triggering Swiss Harmonization. In: Martens, K., Nagel, AK., Windzio, M., Weymann, A. (eds) Transformation of Education Policy. Transformations of the State. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230281295_5
  7. de Boer, H., Enders, J., & Leišytė, L. (2007). Public Sector Reform in Dutch Higher Education: The Organizational Transformation of the University. Public Administration, 85 (1), 27-46.
  8. de Boer, H., & Goedegebuure, L. (2003). New rules of the game? Reflections on governance, management and system change. In J. File and L. Goedegebuure, (Eds.). Real-time systems. Reflections on higher education in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovenia (pp. 207-234). Center for Higher Education Policy Studies: University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands and Vutium, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic.
  9. Chen, Y., Zhou, R., & Zhou, Y. (2022). Analysis of critical factors for the entrepreneurship in industries of the future based on DEMATEL-ISM approach. Sustainability, 14(24), 16812. doi:org/10.3390/su142416812
  10. Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transition. Oxford Pergamon Press.
  11. Clark, B. R. (1998). The Entrepreneurial University: Demand and Response. Tertiary Education and Management, 4(1), 5-16.
  12. Clark, B. (1983). The higher education system. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  13. Davari, A. (2005). Oral history of higher education, Tehran: Office of Social Studies and Cultural Planning.
  14. Dobbins, M. & Knill, C. (2009). Higher education policies in Central and Eastern Europe: Convergence towards a common model? Governance, 22(3), 397–430.
  15. Entezari, Y. (2010). Sixty years of higher education, research and technology in IRAN, Tehran: Research Institute and Higher education planning.
  16. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000), “The dynamics of Innovation: From the national systems and “mode2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relation”. Research policy, 20(2), 109-23.
  17. Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2007). Regional Innovation Initiator: The Entrepreneurial University in Various Triple Helix Models. Singapore Triple Helix VI conference. National University of Singapore.16-18 May 2007.
  18. European Commission. (2006). Delivering on the modernisation agenda for Universities: Education, research and innovation—Communication from the commission to the council and the European Parliament, 12.09.2009. http://ec.europa.eu/education/higher-education/doc1320_en.
  19. Ferasatkhah, M. (2009). Stories and incidents of university in Iran, Tehran: Resa. (In Persian)
  20. Gibb, A. (2012). Exploring the synergistic potential in entrepreneurial university development: towards the building of a strategic framework. Annals of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 3, 16742. DOI: 10.3402/aie. v3i0.16742.
  21. Gibb, A. (2005). Towards the Entrepreneurial University; Entrepreneurship Education as a lever for change. National Council for Graduate Entrepreneurship, UK, Policy Paper No.003.
  22. Gornitzka, A., & Maassen, P. (2000). National policies concerning the economic role of higher education. Higher Education Policy, 13(3), 225–230.
  23. Gornitzka, A., Maassen, P., Olsen, J., & Stensaker, B. (2007). Europe of knowledge: Search for a new pact. In P. Maassen and J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and European integration (pp. 181–214). Dordrecht: Springer.
  24. Guerrero, M., Kirby, D.A., & Urbano, D. (2006). A literature review on entrepreneurial university: an institutional approach. 3rd Conference of Pre-communications to Congresses, Business Economic Department. Autonomous University of Barcelona. Barcelona, June 2006.
  25. Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2010). The development of an entrepreneurial university. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(1).
  26. Häusermann, J., & Landmann, T. (2003). Map-making and analysis of the main international initiatives on developing indicators on democracy and good governance. Eurostat Contract No. 200221200005 Final Report.
  27. Jongbloed, B. (2003). Marketization in higher education, Clark’s triangle and the essential ingredients of markets. Higher Education Quarterly, 57(2), 110–135.
  28. Kaiser, F. (2007). Higher education in France: Country report. International Higher Education Monitor. Enschede: CHEPS, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies, University of Twente.
  29. Kennedy, K. (2003). Higher Education Governance as a Key Policy Issue in the 21st Century. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 2 (1), 55.
  30. Kirby, D.A., & Ibrahim, N. (2011). The case for (social) entrepreneurship education in Egyptian universities. Education and Training, 53 (5), 403–415.
  31. Mahboubi Ardakani, H. (1991). History of new civilizations institute in Iran, Tehran: Tehran University.
  32. Marginson, S. (2013). Different roads to a shared goal: political and cultural variation in world-class Universities. Different Approaches to a shared goal. Wang, Q. Cheng, Y. & Liu, N. C. Eds, Sense Publisher, Rotterdam.
  33. Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  34. Munawir, M., Raharjo, K., Djalil, M., Syahputra, H., Muslim, B., & Adam, M. (2019). Dimensions of identity strength and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) in establishing good university governance and performance of religious ideology-based higher educations. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 11(2), 250-272.
  35. Neave, G. (2004). Mr Prometheus—unbound, shackled or released on parole? Being certain adumbrations on the marvellously changing relationship between government and higher education in Western Europe. Paper presented at the Fulbright Brainstorms 2004—New Trends in Higher Education. http://www.ccla.pt/brainstorms/release1.0 /pdf/09_GuyNeave.pdf (consul ed 15 Apr 2005).
  36. Niemann, D. (2010). Turn of the tide—New horizons in German education policymaking through IO influence. In K. Martens, N. Alexander-Kenneth, W. Michael, and W. Ansgar (Eds.), Transformation of education policy—The impact of the bologna process and the PISA study in comparative perspective (pp. 77–104). Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  37. (2007). On the Edge: Securing a Sustainable Future for Higher Education. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 7, OECD Publishing.
  38. Olsen, J. (2007). The institutional dynamics of the European University. In M. Peter and O. Johan (Eds.), University Dynamics and European Integration. Dordrecht: Springer.
  39. Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleikle, I., & Ferlie, E. (2009). University governance: Western European perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
  40. Philpott, K., Dooley, L., O’Reilly, C., & Lupton, G. (2011). The entrepreneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions. Technovation, 31, 161-170.
  41. Pourtaheri, M. (2010). Application of multi–attitude decision making methods in geography. Tehran: SAMT Publication.
  42. Quiñones, R.S., Caladcad, J.A.A., Himang, C.M., Quiñones, H.G., Castro, C.J., Caballes, S.A.A., Abellana, D.P.M., Jabilles, E. M. Y., & Ocampo, L.A. (2020). Using Delphi and fuzzy DEMATEL for analyzing the intertwined relationships of the barriers of university technology transfer: Evidence from a developing economy. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 4(3), 85-104.
  43. Rezayat, G.H. (2012). Educational booklet of content analysis workshop with emphasis on content analysis of Scientific interview. Iranian Higher Education Association.
  44. Vaira, M. (2004). Globalization and higher education organizational change: A framework for analysis. Higher Education, 48, 483–510.
  45. Tohidyan Far, S., & Rezaei-Moghaddam, K. (2019). Multifunctional agriculture: An approach for entrepreneurship development of agricultural sector. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9 (23),1-23, doi: 10.1186/s40497-019-0148-4.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 165
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 145


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب