دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات33
تعداد شماره‌ها775
تعداد مقالات7,506
تعداد مشاهده مقاله12,578,310
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله8,512,856
Ebrahimi, Behnam, Vaez Barzani, Mohammad. (1404). Evaluating the Inflationary Rule of Exchange Rate Determination based on the Resistive Economy Strategy (Case Study: Iran). نشریه علمی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان, 17(1), 237-274. doi: 10.22111/ijbds.2025.50506.2179
Behnam Ebrahimi; Mohammad Vaez Barzani. "Evaluating the Inflationary Rule of Exchange Rate Determination based on the Resistive Economy Strategy (Case Study: Iran)". نشریه علمی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان, 17, 1, 1404, 237-274. doi: 10.22111/ijbds.2025.50506.2179
Ebrahimi, Behnam, Vaez Barzani, Mohammad. (1404). 'Evaluating the Inflationary Rule of Exchange Rate Determination based on the Resistive Economy Strategy (Case Study: Iran)', نشریه علمی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان, 17(1), pp. 237-274. doi: 10.22111/ijbds.2025.50506.2179
Ebrahimi, Behnam, Vaez Barzani, Mohammad. Evaluating the Inflationary Rule of Exchange Rate Determination based on the Resistive Economy Strategy (Case Study: Iran). نشریه علمی دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان, 1404; 17(1): 237-274. doi: 10.22111/ijbds.2025.50506.2179

Evaluating the Inflationary Rule of Exchange Rate Determination based on the Resistive Economy Strategy (Case Study: Iran)

International Journal of Business and Development Studies
مقاله 12، دوره 17، شماره 1، تیر 2025، صفحه 237-274    اصل مقاله (1.61 M)
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/ijbds.2025.50506.2179
نویسندگان
Behnam Ebrahimi* 1؛ Mohammad Vaez Barzani2
1PhD in Monetary/Financial Economics, University of Isfahan
2Department of Economics, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan, Esfahan, Iran
چکیده
The exchange rate is a critical variable that impacts the economy in the international environment. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the two approaches to exchange rate determination outlined in the Law on Permanent Decrees of the Country's Development Programs under economic sanctions. The analysis involves a theoretical discussion of a set of mathematical equations and software results, obtained from the algebraic and numerical solving of a simulated version of a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model in the context of the international economy for a small open economy. The model is calibrated using the structural parameters of the Iranian economy. The criterion for evaluating the rule and comparing it with other policy options is the "stability" of macroeconomic variables, a key aspect of the Resistive Economy Strategy as the obliging basic document in economic policy-making and planning. The stability is quantified using the "Variance" index. Based on the results of this study, the adoption of the rule-based inflationary exchange rate determination approach, compared with the contingency approach to exchange rate determination, on the one hand, offers the possibility of achieving lower inflation rates and exchange rate growth pace. On the other hand, it will reduce the instability of selected macroeconomic variables, which is desirable from the perspective of the overall policies of the resistance economy strategy. Therefore, it is recommended that, in the presence of foreign economic sanctions, the economic authority should implement inflationary rule of exchange rate determination based on the current inflation rate.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Inflationary Rule of Exchange Rate Determination (IR-ERD)؛ Discretionary Approach to Exchange Rate Determination (DA-ERD)؛ Economic Sanctions؛ and Resistive Economy Strategy (RES)
مراجع
  1. Aguir, A. and Smida, M. (2015). Efficiency of monetary policy under inflation targeting. Economics Bulletin, Volume 35, Issue 1. Pages 788-813.
  2. Akhbari, M. and Qolizadeh, S. (2015). Macroeconomic stability in the resistive economy approach. Ravand Quarterly. 71, 55-78.
  3. Barro, R.J. and Gordon, D.B. (1983). Ru1es, Discretion and Reputation in a Model of Monetary Policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12: 101-22.
  4. Benes, J. Berg, A. Portillo, R. A. and Vavra, D. (2014). Modeling Sterilized Interventions and Balance Sheet Effects of Monetary Policy in a New-Keynesian Framework. Journal of Economies Review, 26: 81-108.
  5. Blanchard, O. and Fischer, S. (1989). Lectures in Macroeconomics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  6. Branson, W. (1977). Asset markets and relative prices in exchange rate determination. Sozialwissenschaftliche Annalen, 1(1977): 69-89.
  7. Briguglio, L. Cordina, G. Farrugia, N. & Vella, S. (2009). Economic Vulnerability and Resilience: Concepts and Measurements. Oxford Development Studies, 37(3), 229–247.
  8. Cassel, G. (1918). Abnormal deviations in international exchange rates. Economic Journal, 28(112): 413-415.
  9. Cerra, V. (2016). Inflation and the Black Market Exchange Rate in a Repressed Market: A Model of Venezuela. IMF Working Paper No. WP/16/159.
  10. Dornbusch, R. (1976). Expectations and exchange rate dynamics. Journal of Political Economy, 84(6): 1161-1176.
  11. Drygalla, A. (2022). Monetary policy in an oil‑dependent economy in the presence of multiple shocks. Review of World Economics. 159, 185–214
  12. Eichengreen, B. Minesso, M. F. Mehl, A. Vansteenkiste, I. Vicquéry, R. (2023). Sanctions and the Exchange Rate in Time. Economic Policy. (DOI: 10.1093/epolic/eiad034).
  13. Farzanegan, M. R. Khabbazan, M. M. & Sadeghi, H. (2016). Effects of oil sanctions on Iran’s economy and household welfare: New evidence from a CGE model. In Economic Welfare and Inequality in Iran (pp. 185-211). Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
  14. Fleming, M. J. (1962). Domestic Financial Policies under Fixed and under Floating Exchange Rates. IMF Staff Papers, 9(3): 369–380.
  15. Frenkel, J. A. (1976). A monetary approach to the exchange rate: doctrinal aspects and empirical evidence. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 78(2): 200-224.
  16. Gersl, A. and Holub, T. (2006). Foreign Exchange Interventions under Inflation Targeting: The Czech Experience. Contemporary Economic Policy, 24(4); 475–491.
  17. Gnabo, J. V. de Mello, L. and Moccero, D. (2010). Interdependencies between Monetary Policy and Foreign Exchange Interventions under Inflation Targeting: The Case of Brazil and the Czech Republic. International Finance, 13(2); 195–221.
  18. Hemmati, M. Hadian, E. Samadi, A. H. & Sadraei Javaheri, A. (2022). The Impact of Economic Sanctions on Real Exchange Rate Misalignment in Iran. Iranian Journal of Economic Studies, 11(1), 223-245.
  19. Heydarian, S. Pahlavani, M. and Mirjalili, Sd. H. (2021). Financial Sanctions and Economic Growth: An Intervention Time-series Approach. International Economic Studies, 51(1); 1-14.
  20. International Monetary Fund. (2003). Classification of Exchange Rate Arrangements and Monetary Policy Frameworks. Retrieved from: https://www.imf.org/external/np/mfd/er/2003/eng/1203.htm
  21. International Monetary Fund. (2014). Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions. Washington.
  22. Itskhoki, O. Mukhin, D. (2022). Sanctions and the Exchange Rate. NBER Working Paper No 30009.
  23. Jahan, S. (2014). Inflation Targeting: Holding the Line. International Monetary Funds, Finance & Development. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  24. Khabbazan, M. M. & Farzanegan, M. R. (2016). Household welfare in Iran under banking sanctions: From open economy toward autarchy. In Economic Welfare and Inequality in Iran (pp. 213-232). Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
  25. Kouri, P. J. (1976). The exchange rate and the balance of payments in the short run and in the long run: a monetary approach. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 78(2): 280-304.
  26. Kydland, F. and Prescott, E.C., (1977). Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans. Journal of Political Economy, 85: 473-92.
  27. Lorenzoni, G. and Werning, I. (2022). A Minimalist Model for the Ruble during the Russian Invasion of Ukraine. NBER Working Paper No. 29929.
  28. Lucas, R. E. (1982). Interest rates and currency prices in a two-country world. Journal of Monetary Economics, 10(3): 335-360.
  29. Malek-Alipour, G. and Pourpir, M. (2012). Comparative elaboration of resistive economy policy and other economic schools. Proceedings of the National Conference on Reviewing and Explaining Resistive Economy, Gilan University, Rasht.
  30. Mayes, G. M. and Riches, B. (1996). The effectiveness of monetary policy in New Zealand. Reserve Bank Bulletin, Vol 59, No 1. Pages 5-20.
  31. Moeeni, Sh. Sharifi, A. Mozafari Shamsi, H. and Mohammadi, V. (2021). The Impact of Iran Oil Sanctions on the Exchange Rates: An Analysis Using Google Search Index. Iranian Economic Review 2021, 25(3); 397-417.
  32. Mundell, R. A. (1960). The Monetary Dynamics of International Adjustment under Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rates. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 74(2): 227–257.
  33. Nakhli, sd. R. Rafat, M. Bakhshi Dastjerdi, R. Rafei. (2020). A DSGE Analysis of the Effects of Economic Sanctions: Evidence from the Central Bank of Iran. Iranian Journal of Economic Studies, 9(1); 35-70.
  34. Obstfeld, M., & Rogoff, K. (1995). Exchange rate dynamics redux. Journal of Political Economy, 103(3): 624-660.
  35. Obstfeld, M., & Stockman, A. (1985). Exchange rate dynamics. In Bilson, F. O. & Marston, R. C. Exchange Rate Theory and Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  36. Onour, I. (2020). Modelling the impact of economic sanctions on small open economy: A dynamic approach. MPRA Paper 116005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  37. Pourshahabi, F. and Dahmardeh, N. (2015). Economic sanction, speculative attacks currency crisis. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 5(2):340-355.
  38. Rahmati, M. H. Ebrahimian, M. and Madanizadeh, sd. A. (2021). Dynamic effects of trade barriers with speculation on foreign currency: The case of Iran. International Economics 167 (2021) 151–173.
  39. Rajabi Kalvani, P., Keshavarz Shal, F., and Aryamanesh, T. (2012). Economic sanctions and resistive economy strategies to defeat sanctions. Proceedings of the National Conference on Reviewing and Explaining Resistive Economy, Gilan University, Rasht.
  40. Rasolyar, M. S. Babaei, J. and Yavari, Sh. (2015). The Effect of Sanctions on Exchange Rates through GMM Method (A Cross Country Comparison). International Journal of Review in Life Sciences, 5(3); 1202-1207.
  41. Rezaei, E. and Molabahrami, A. (2016). Tax policies’ impact on the dynamics of growth, capital, and consumption based on an optimal growth model; Case study: Iran and East Asian countries. Economic Research Quarterly (sustainable growth and development), 17(1), 73-94.
  42. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 70(1), 65-94.
  43. Sondermann, D. (2016). Towards more resilient economies; The role of well-functioning economic structures. ECB woking Paper, No. 1984.
  44. Swan, T. W. (1956). Economic growth and capital accumulation. Economic record, 32(2), 334-361.
  45. Taylor, J. B. (1993). Discretion versus Policy Rules in Practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 39, 195-214.
  46. Trautwein, HM. (1997). The Uses of the Pure Credit Economy. In: Cohen, A.J., Hagemann, H., Smithin, J. (eds) Money, Financial Institutions and Macroeconomics. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 53. Springer, Dordrecht.
  47. Turki, L. and Mazaheri, B. (2022). The economic effects of financial sanctions on Iran's economy. Scientific Economic Research Quarterly (Sustainable Growth and Development), 22(4), 69-98.
  48. Tyll, L. Pernica, K. & Arltová, M. (2018). The impact of economic sanctions on Russian economy and the RUB/USD exchange rate. Journal of International Studies, 11(1); 21-33.
  49. Wang, Y. Wang, K. and Chang, Ch. P. (2019). The impacts of economic sanctions on exchange rate volatility. Economic Modelling, 82(2019); 58-65.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 126
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 43


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب