| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 834 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,015 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 14,852,488 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,586,513 |
Modeling of Sorkheh Reverse Osmosis (RO) Water Treatment Plant by Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with Genetic Algorithm (GA) | ||
| Chemical Process Design | ||
| دوره 1، شماره 1، شهریور 2022، صفحه 33-42 اصل مقاله (1.8 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/cpd.2022.43365.1006 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Hamidreza Ardeshiri Lordejani1؛ Amir Heidari* 2؛ Nader Ghods3 | ||
| 1Process Modeling and Simulation Laboratory (psmlab.ir), Faculty of Chemical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Semnan University, 3513119111, Semnan, Iran | ||
| 2Process Simulation and Modeling Laboratory (PSMlab.ir), Faculty of Chemical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, 3513119111, Iran | ||
| 3Deputy of Water Exploitation and Development, Basij Blvd, 3519863131, Semnan, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The Reverse Osmosis (RO) process is one of the most widely used technologies in the water treatment industry to reduce water hardness. In this paper, the reverse osmosis treatment plant of Sorkheh city (Semnan province, Iran) was modeled by Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model. The ANN model parameters were optimized with the Genetic Algorithm (GA) method to increase ANN model accuracy. The optimization was done by updating the weight and bias, the number of layer neurons, activator functions, and the ANN training equation. The mean relative error of optimized ANN model results with respect to industrial data was obtained about 0.73% for water outlet flow rate and 0.47% for water pH. While the mean relative errors for water outlet flow rate and water pH in the non-optimized ANN model were evaluated 26.24% and 4.76%, respectively. Also, the results showed that the regression coefficient for the optimized neural network is equal to 0.995. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Reverse Osmosis (RO) plant؛ Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model؛ Genetic Algorithm (GA)؛ Optimization | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H., Ghalami, H., Amidpour, M., and Hamedi, M.H., 2013. Optimal coupling of site utility steam network with MED-RO desalination through total site analysis and exergo-economic optimization, Desalination, 316, 42-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.01.022
[2] Koutroulis, E. and Kolokotsa, D., 2010. Design optimization of desalination systems power-supplied by PV and W/G energy sources, Desalination, 258(1), 171-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.03.018
[3] Zamen, M., Amidpour, M., and Soufari, S.M., 2009. Cost optimization of a solar humidification–dehumidification desalination unit using mathematical programming. Desalination, 239(1), 92-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.03.009
[4] Al-Karaghouli, A. and Kazmerski, L.L., 2013. Energy consumption and water production cost of conventional and renewable-energy-powered desalination processes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24, 343-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.064
[5] Giwa, A., Hasan, S.W., Yousuf, A., Chakraborty, S., Johnson, D.J., and Hilal, N., 2017. Biomimetic membranes: A critical review of recent progress. Desalination, 420, 403-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.06.025
[6] Karagiannis, I.C. and Soldatos, P.G., 2008. Water desalination cost literature: review and assessment, Desalination, 223(1), 448-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.071
[7] Mavukkandy, M.O., Bilad, M.R., Giwa, A., Hasan, S.W., and Arafat, H.A., 2016. Leaching of PVP from PVDF/PVP blend membranes: impacts on membrane structure and fouling in membrane bioreactors, Journal of Materials Science, 51(9), 4328-4341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-9744-7
[8] Gil, J.D., Ruiz-Aguirre, A., Roca, L., Zaragoza, G., and Berenguel, M., 2018. Prediction models to analyse the performance of a commercial-scale membrane distillation unit for desalting brines from RO plants, Desalination, 445, 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.07.022
[9] Hitsov, I., Maere, T., De Sitter, K., Dotremont, C., and Nopens, I., 2015. Modelling approaches in membrane distillation: A critical review, Separation and Purification Technology, 142, 48-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2014.12.026
[10] Yang, C., Peng, X., Zhao, Y., Wang, X., Fu, J., Liu, K., Li, Y., and Li, P., 2020. Prediction model to analyze the performance of VMD desalination process, Computers and Chemical Engineering. 132, 106619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.106619
[11] Mohammad, A.T., Al-Obaidi, M.A., Hameed, E.M., Basheer, B.N., and Mujtaba, I.M., 2020. Modelling the chlorophenol removal from wastewater via reverse osmosis process using a multilayer artificial neural network with genetic algorithm, Journal of Water Process Engineering, 33, 100993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100993
[12] Yaqub, M., Lee, S.H., 2020. Experimental and neural network modeling of micellar enhanced ultrafiltration for arsenic removal from aqueous solution. Environmental Engineering Research, 26(1), 190261. https://doi.org/10.4491%2Feer.2019.261
[13] Al Aani, S., Bonny, T., Hasan, S.W., and Hilal, N., 2019. Can machine language and artificial intelligence revolutionize process automation for water treatment and desalination, Desalination, 458, 84-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.02.005
[14] Ahmad Yasmin, N., Wahab, N., Anuar, A., and Bob, M., 2019. Performance comparison of SVM and ANN for aerobic granular sludge, Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 8(4), 1392–1401. https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v8i4.1605
[15] Kim, B., Choi, Y., Choi, J., Shin, Y., and Lee, S., 2020. Effect of surfactant on wetting due to fouling in membrane distillation membrane: Application of response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural networks (ANN), Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 37(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.021
[16] Pourrahmani, H., Van herle, J., 2022. Water management of the proton exchange membrane fuel cells: Optimizing the effect of microstructural properties on the gas diffusion layer liquid, Energy, 256, 124712, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124712 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 846 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 430 |
||