پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 834 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,015 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 14,852,519 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,586,536 |
Scientific and Ethical Considerations in Sampling Artefacts in Archaeological Sciences | ||
| Iranian Journal of Archaeological Studies | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 15، شماره 2، 2025، صفحه 99-118 اصل مقاله (845.24 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Review Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/ijas.2025.51593.1344 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mehdi Razani* 1؛ Fateme Alimirzaei2 | ||
| 1Department of Conservation and Archaeometry, Tabriz Islamic Art University. Tabriz. Iran. | ||
| 2Cultural Heritage and Tourism Research Institute, Tehran. Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Sampling historical-cultural artefacts from museums and excavation sites is a delicate and critical phase in archaeological research and the conservation of cultural heritage. This process, essential for generating scientific data, must follow established scientific principles as well as pertinent ethical guidelines in the field. Adhering to these principles is crucial to prevent damage to the artefacts and preserve their cultural and historical significance. Employing a descriptive-analytical approach, this study systematically examines the scientific and ethical challenges involved in this process, utilising library resources and the authors’ field experiences. The findings revealed that ethical and optimal sampling of historical-cultural artefacts requires the integration of three key dimensions: 1) Technical dimension, involving the selection of minimally invasive, high-precision methods and the development of standardised protocols for sampling; 2) Ethical dimension, encompassing adherence to the five core principles of minimum intervention, scientific justification, transparency, accountability, and respect for stakeholders’ rights; and 3) Managerial dimension, which includes establishing controlled sample repositories. These findings underscore the necessity of formulating national scientific and ethical sampling guidelines. Furthermore, they demonstrate how implementing such a framework can safeguard artefacts from physical damage, enhance the purposefulness and accuracy of sampling, prevent resource waste, reduce the frequency of sampling through improved access to collected data (via sample databases), and most importantly, ensure the satisfaction of current and future stakeholders. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Cultural Heritage؛ Sampling؛ Ethical Guidelines؛ Archaeological Sciences؛ Archaeometry | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adriaens, A. 2005. Non-Destructive Analysis and Testing of Museum Objects: An Overview of 5 Years of Research. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 60(12): 1503-1516.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2005.10.006
American Institute for Conservation of Historic & Artistic Works. (n.d.). Code of Ethics and Guidelines for Practice. Retrieved from http://www.conservation-us.org/our-organizations/association-(aic)/governance/code-of-ethics-and-guidelines-for-practice/code-of-ethics-and-guidelines-for-practice-(html)#.Wvk8s--FMdU
American Institute of Archaeology. 2021. Code of Ethics and Professional Standards.
Arizpe, L. 2000. ‘Cultural Heritage and Globalization’, In E. Avrant; R. Mason & M. de La Torre, (eds.), Values and Heritage Conservation. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute, 32–37.
Artioli, G. 2010. Scientific Methods and Cultural Heritage: An Introduction to the Application of Materials Science to Archaeometry and Conservation Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199548262.001.0001
Ashley-Smith, J. 1982. The Ethics of Conservation. The Conservator 6(1):1-5.
Banning, E. B. 2020. The Archaeologist’s Laboratory: The Analysis of Archaeological Data. Switzerland:Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47992-3
Beaudry, M. C. 2009. Ethical Issues in Historical Archaeology. In T. Majewski & D. Gaimster ,(eds.),International Handbook of Historical Archaeology. New York : Springer Science, 17-29. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-0-387-72071-5_2
British Standards Institution (BSI). 2012. Conservation of Cultural Property—Methodology for Sampling from Materials of Cultural Property—General Rules (BS EN 16085:2012). British: BSI Standards .
Caple, C. 2021. Conservation Skills: Judgement, Method, and Decision Making. London : Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203086261
Carver, M. 2021. Archaeological Investigation. London :Routledge.
Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C & T. J. Ferguson. 2020. Collaboration in Archaeological Practice: Engaging Descendant Communities. California : AltaMira Press.
Cronyn, J. M. 2003. Elements of Archaeological Conservation. London : Routledge.
Freeman, R. E. 2010. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gharamaleki, A. 2017. Professional Ethics: Fundamentals and Frameworks,[In Persian]. Tehran :Tehran University Press.
Goldberg, P ; R. I. Macphail; C. Carey & Y. Zhuang . 2022. Practical and Theoretical Geoarchaeology. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
Gueli, A. M; G.Stella; S. O. Troja; G. Burrafato; A. R. Zuccarello & C. Di Stefano. 2017. A non-Destructive Approach to the Study of Archaeological Glass Fragments. Journal of Cultural Heritage 24(1):106-112.
Hester, T. R; H. J.Shafer & K. L. Feder. 2009. Field Methods in Archaeology (7th ed.), California: Left Coast Press.
Holmes, R. L. 2007. Basic Moral Philosophy.[In Persian], Translated by M. Olia. Tehran: Ghoghnoos.
ICOM . 2021.ICOM Code of Ethics . Paris: International Council of Museums.
ICOM-CC. (n.d.). Code of Ethics . Paris: International Council of Museums. https://www.icom-cc.org/en/
Institute of Conservation (ICON). 2019. Guidelines for Ethical Sampling in Heritage Science. London : ICON https://www.icon.org.uk
International Council of Museums (ICOM). 2021. Code of Ethics for Museums.Paris: ICOM . https://icom.museum/en/resources/standards-guidelines/code-of-ethics/
International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS). 1964. The Venice Charter. Paris: International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) https://www.icomos.org/en/participer/179-articles-en-francais/ressources/charters-and-standards/157-thevenice-charter
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) . 2018. Sterilization of Health Care Products Biological and Chemical Indicators — Test Equipment and Methods. 46. Switzerland: ISO. available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/70393.html.
Lloyd, S. 1984. The Archaeology of Mesopotamia: From the Old Stone Age to the Persian Conquest. Britain : Thames & Hudson.
Lynott, M. J & A. Wylie. 2021. Ethics in American Archaeology. Washington, DC :Society for American Archaeology.
Martens, M. P. 2015. « Leave It or Take it Away »: Ethical Considerations on the Removal of Overpaintings : the case of the Ghent Altarpiece. Open Edition Journal. n.vol(n.no): 1-9. https://doi.org/ 10.4000/ceroart.4765
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. n.d. Destructive Sampling on Archaeological Remains , Chapter 2, Ethics. https://www.eva.mpg.de/archaeogenetics/ethics/chapter-2/
National Standard of Iran. 2006. Sampling Standards for Cultural Heritage Materials: Methodology - General Provisions Under the Collection of Cultural Heritage Conservation Standards (No. 20034).[In Persian]. Tehran : Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran.
Olivares, M; A. Tarriño; X. Murelaga; J.I. Baceta; K.Castro & N.Etxebarria. 2009. Non-Destructive Fpectrometry Methods to Study the Distribution of Archaeological and Geological Chert Samples. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 73(3): 492-497https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2008.12.036.
Oddy W.A. 1984. Scientific Examination of Artefacts, In J.M.A. Thomson; D.A. Bassett ; A.J. Duggan, G.D. Lewis & A. Fenton ,(eds.), Manual of Curatorship, A Guide to Museum Practice. Oxford : Butterworth-Heinemann, 480–486.
Orton, C & M. Hughes. 2013. Pottery in Archaeology. Cambridge :Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920066
Orton, C. 2000. Sampling in Archaeology. Cambridge :Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163996
Pearsall, D. M. 2000. Paleoethnobotany: A Handbook of Procedures, 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315423098
Quye, A. 2019. Minimally Invasive Sampling for Heritage Science. Studies in Conservation, 64(sup1): S1-S10.
Quye, A & M. Strlič. 2019. Ethical Sampling Guidance [Manual]. London: Institute of Conservation. (https://www.icon.org.uk/resource/ethical-sampling-guidance.html).
Razani, M; F. Martinez Conejero ; M. Mansori Isfahani & H. Afsharinezhad. 2017. Preparation of Thin Sections of Porous Materials for Polarizing Microscope Investigation in Archaeometry, [In Persian], Journal of Research in Archaeometry 3(2): 45-60. https://doi.org/ 10.29252/jra.3.2.45
Razani, M; F. Sehati & M. Kasiri. 2021. Archaeometry in the Cultural Heritage Studies and Art (Definitions, Future Trends and Challenges), [In Persian], Journal of Research in Archaeometry 7(1):1-30. https://doi.org/ 10.29252/jra.7.1.1
Razani, M & M. Bater. 2024. A Guide to Documentation and Recording of Ceramic and Pottery Objects in Conservation and Restoration Operations, [In Persian], Knowledge of Conservation an Restoration 7 (2) :29-46 URL: http://kcr.richt.ir/article-1-155-fa.html.
Razani, M & N. Rajabi . 2025. Sampling for Historical-Cultural Artifacts in Iran: Challenges and Solutions, [In Persian], Journal of Research in Archaeometry 11(1): n.p. https://doi.org/10.61186/jra.11.1.455
Renfrew, C & P. Bahn. 2016. Archaeology: Theories, Methods, and Practice. London :Thames & Hudson.
Scarre, C & G. Scarre, G (eds.). 2006. The Ethics of Archaeology: Philosophical Perspectives on Archaeological Practice. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.2277/0521840112%2C+10.2277/0521549426
Shackley, M.S. 2011. An Introduction to X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Analysis in Archaeology. In M.S. Shackley , (ed.), X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry (XRF) in Geoarchaeology. New York: Springer , 7–44 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6886-9_2
Shaikh Baikloo Islam B. 2023. How the Climate Change Package Affects Human Societies: The Archaeological-Historical Approach into Palaeoclimatology, [In Persian], Journal of Research on Archaeometry 9(2): 165-172. https://doi.org/ 10.52547/jra.9.2.396
Shomali, M. A. 2010. The Science of Ethics and Moral Philosophy: A Reflection on Various Domains of Ethical Studies, [In Persian], Ma’rifat-i Akhlaqi 1(3): 7-26.
Squiers, K; D. Errickson & N. Marquez-Grant,(eds.). 2019. Ethical Approaches to Human Remains: a Global Challenge in Bioarchaeology and Forensic Anthrology. UK: Springer.
Tartaron, T. F. 2003. The Archaeological Survey: Sampling Strategies and Field Methods. Hesperia Supplements 32(1) 23-45.https://doi.org/10.2307/1354045
Thomsen,P.F;S.Elias;MTP.Gilbert;J.Haile;K.Munch; S. Kuzmina, D.GFroese;A.Sher ;R. N. Holdaway;E.Willerslev.2009.Non-Destructive Sampling of Ancient Insect DNA. PLoS ONE 4(4): e5048. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005048
UNESCO. 1970. Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. 2003. Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
Walker, P. L. 2022. Bioarchaeological Ethics: Perspectives on the Use and Value of Human Remains in Scientific Research. London: Routledge. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 533 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 92 |
||