تأثیر داده‌های مفقود در سوگیری و دقت سوالات پرسشنامه بیگانگی تحصیلی

Ankenmann, R. D., Witt, E. A., & Dunbar, S. B. (1999). An investigation of the power of the likelihood ratio goodness-of-fit statistic in detecting differential item functioning. Journal of Educational Measurement, 36(4), 277-300.

Balsis, S., Gleason, M. E., Woods, C. M., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2007). An IRT analysis of DSM-IV personality disorder criteria across younger and older age groups. Psychology and aging, 22(1), 171-185.

Banks, K. (2015). An introduction to missing data in the context of differential item functioning. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 20(1), 12-35.

Banks, K., & Walker, C. (2006). Performance of SIBTEST when focal group examinees have missing data. San Francisco: National Council of Measurement in Education.

Bradley, J. V. (1978). Robustness? British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31(2), 144-152.

Buhi, E. R., Goodson, P., Neilands, T. B. (2008). Out of sight, not out of mind: Strategies for handling missing data. American Journal of Health Behavior, 32(1), 83-92.

Burbach, H. J. (1972). An empirical study of powerlessness among high school students. The High School Journal, 55(7), 343-354.

Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Thompson Learning.

Demir, E. (2013). Item and test parameters estimations for multiple-choice tests in the presence of missing data: The case of SBS. Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 3(2), 47–68.

Dodd, B, G., De Ayala, R. J., & Koch, W. R. (1995). Computerized adaptive testing with polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(1), 5-22.

Drasgow, F., Levine, M. V., Tsien, S., Williams, B., & Mead, A. D. (1995). Fitting polytomous Item Response Theory models to multiple-choice tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(2), 143-165.

Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Enders, C. K. (2013). Dealing with missing data in developmental research. Child Development Perspectives, 7(1), 27-31.

Finch, H. (2011). The use of multiple imputation for missing data in uniform DIF analysis: Power and Type I error rates. Applied Measurement in Education, 24(4), 281-301.

Finch, H. (2011). The impact of missing data on the detection of nonuniform differential item functioning. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(4), 663-683.

Garrett, P. L. (2009). A Monte Carlo study investigating missing data, differential item functioning, and effect. (Doctoral dissertation). Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA. Retrieved from ProQuest LLC. (UMI 3401601).

Gelin, M. N., & Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Operating characteristics of the DIF MIMIC approach using Jöreskog’s covariance matrix with ML and WLS estimation for short scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6(2), 22.

Giraldo, F. (2020). Validity and Classroom Language Testing: A Practical Approach. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 22(2), 194-206.

Guilera, G., Gómez-Benito, J., Hidalgo, M. D., & Sánchez-Meca, J. (2013). Type I error and statistical power of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure for detecting DIF: A meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 18(4), 553.

Gómez-Benito, J., Balluerka, N., González, A., Widaman, K. F., & Padilla, J. L. (2017). Detecting differential item functioning in behavioral indicators across parallel forms. Psicothema, 29(1), 91-95.

Gómez-Benito, J., Sireci, S., García, J. L. P., Montesinos, M. D. H., & Baena, I. B. (2018). Differential item functioning: Beyond validity evidence based on internal structure. Psicothema, 30(1), 104-109.

Hidalgo, M. D., López-Martínez, M. D., Gómez-Benito, J., & Guilera, G. (2016). A comparison of discriminant logistic regression and Item Response Theory Likelihood-Ratio Tests for Differential Item Functioning (IRTLRDIF) in polytomous short tests. Psicothema, 83-88.

Jin, K., Chen H. (2020). MIMIC approach to assessing differential item functioning with control of extreme response style. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1)- 131-147.

McKnight, P. E., McKnight, K. M., Sidani, S., & Figuedero, A. J. (2007). Missing data: A gentle introduction. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Morinaj, J., Hadjar, A., & Hascher, T. (2020). School alienation and academic achievement in Switzerland and Luxembourg: a longitudinal perspective. Social psychology of education, 47(3), 1-36.

O’Rouke, T. W. (2003). Methodological techniques for dealing with missing data. American Journal of Health Studies, 18(2/3), 165-168.

Paek, I., & Wilson, M. (2011). Formulating the Rasch differential item functioning model under the marginal maximum likelihood estimation context and its comparison with Mantel–Haenszel procedure in short test and small sample conditions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(6), 1023-1046.

Rayce, S. B., Kreiner, S., Damsgaard, M. T., Nielsen, T., & Holstein, B. E. (2018). Measurement of alienation among adolescents: construct validity of three scales on powerlessness, meaninglessness and social isolation. Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2(1), 1-12.

Reeve, B. B. (2002). An introduction to modern measurement theory. National Cancer Institute, 1-67.

Robitzsch, A., & Rupp, A. (2009). Impact of missing data on the detection of differential item functioning: The case of Mantel-Haenszel and logistic regression analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(1), 18-34.

Samejima, F. (2010). The general graded response model. In M. L. Nering & R. Ostini (Eds.), Handbook of polytomous item response theory (pp. 77-107), New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147-177.

Scott, N. W., Fayers, P. M., Aaronson, N. K., Bottomley, A., de Graeff, A., Groenvold, M., & Sprangers, M. A. (2010). Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses of health-related quality of life instruments using logistic regression. Health and quality of life outcomes, 8(1), 1-9.

Sedivy, S. K., Zhang, B., & Traxel, N. M. (2006). Detection of differential item functioning with polytomous items in the presence of missing data. California: National Council of Measurement in Education.

Selvi, H., & Alici, D. Ö. (2018). Investigating the impact of missing data handling methods on the detection of differential item functioning. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 5(1), 1-14.

Thissen, D. (2003). MULTILOG 7.03 User’s guide: Multiple categorical item analysis and test scoring using item response theory. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software International.

Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Wainer, H. (1988). Use of item response theory in the study of group differences in trace lines. In H. Wainer & H. I. Braun (Eds.). Test Validity, (pp. 147-170). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.

Wang, W. C., & Yeh, Y. L. (2003). Effects of anchor item methods on differential item functioning detection with the likelihood ratio test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27(6), 479-498.

Widaman, K. F. (2006). Missing data: What to do with or without them. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 7(13), 42-64.

Woods, C. M. (2008). Likelihood-ratio DIF testing: Effects of non-“”
normality. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32(7), 511-526.

Zhu, X., & Aryadoust, V. (2020). An investigation of mother tongue DIF in a high –stakes computerized academic reading test. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 40(3), 1-25.

Zumbo, B. D. (1999). A handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF): Logistic regression modeling as a unitary framework for binary and Likert-type (ordinal) item scores. Ottawa, ON: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense.