تعداد نشریات | 30 |
تعداد شمارهها | 691 |
تعداد مقالات | 6,782 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 11,081,255 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 7,478,914 |
Consistency fuzzy cross entropy based VIKOR approach for multi-criteria decision making | ||
Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems | ||
دوره 20، شماره 4، مهر و آبان 2023، صفحه 39-56 اصل مقاله (366.94 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/ijfs.2023.41633.7235 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Ezgi Türkarslan1؛ Jun Ye2؛ Mehmet Unver3؛ Murat Olgun* 3 | ||
1TED University | ||
2Ningbo University | ||
3Ankara University | ||
چکیده | ||
The primary aim of the notion of consistency fuzzy set (CFS) is to model the uncertain information given in a fuzzy multi environment and so to obtain meaningful data from the fuzzy multi-sets and to present this data in a compact form via some statistical tools. The data collected by fuzzy multi-sets are processed via CFSs and a sort of data science is done in the fuzzy environment. In this paper, we present a cross entropy measure and a sine entropy measure between CFSs to contribute to processing and modeling of data obtained by statistical methods. Also, we construct a new VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) method by using CFSs that is called CF-VIKOR to carry out decision process in multi-criteria decision making. We apply the proposed method to a multi-criteria decision making problem from the literature and give a comparison analysis between the obtained results and the existing results in literature. Finally, by using the Spearman's and Kendall's rank correlation coefficient measures and Wang and Triantaphyllou validity test we show the efficiency and rationality of the proposed CF-VIKOR method. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Consistency fuzzy set؛ fuzzy cross entropy measure؛ fuzzy sine entropy measure؛ VIKOR method؛ multi-criteria decision making | ||
مراجع | ||
[1] J. Aczel, Z. Daroczy, On measures of information and their characterizations, In: A Series of Monographs and Textbooks Edited by RICHARD BELLMAN, University of Soutlzent California, Mathematics in Science and Engineering, New York: Academic Press, (1975), 1-234.
[2] M. Akram, F. Ilyas, A. N. Al-Kenani, Two-phase group decision-aiding system using ELECTRE III method in Pythagorean fuzzy environment, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 46 (2021), 3549-3566.
[3] K. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1) (1986), 87-96.
[4] K. Atanassov, G. Gargov, Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 31(3) (1989), 343-349.
[5] Z. Aya˘g, F. Samanlio˘glu, A hesitant fuzzy linguistic terms set-based AHP-TOPSIS approach to evaluate ERP soft-ware packages, International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics, 14(1) (2021), 54-77.
[6] J. Baidya, H. Garg, A. Saha, A. R. Mishra, P. Rani, D. Dutta, Selection of third party reverses logistic providers: An approach of BCF-CRITIC-MULTIMOORA using Archimedean power aggregation operators, Complex and Intelligent Systems, 7 (2021), 2503-2530.
[7] B. Ceballos, M. T. Lamata, D. A. Pelta, A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods, Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 5 (2016), 315-322.
[8] W. Cui, J. Ye, Generalized distance-based entropy and dimension root entropy for simplified neutrosophic sets, Entropy, 20(11) (2018), 844-855.
[9] W. Cui, J. Ye, Improved symmetry measures of simpli ed neutrosophic sets and their decision-making method based on a sine entropy weight model, Symmetry, 10(6) (2018), 225-236.
[10] B. C. Cuong, Picture fuzzy sets, Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics, 30(4) (2014), 409-420.
[11] A. De Luca, S. Termini, A de nition of nonprobabilistic entropy in the setting of fuzzy sets theory, Information and Control, 20(4) (1972), 301-312.
[12] I. Deli, M. Ali, F. Smarandache, Bipolar neutrosophic sets and their application based on multi-criteria decision making problems, 2015 International Conference on Advanced Mechatronic Systems (ICAMechS), (2015), 249-254.
[13] B. Dey, B. Bairagi, B. Sarkar, S. K. Sanyal, Multi objective performance analysis: A novel multi-criteria decision making approach for a supply chain, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 94 (2016), 105-124.
[14] C. Du, J. Ye, Hybrid weighted aggregation operator of cubic fuzzy-consistency elements and their group decision-making model in cubic fuzzy multi-valued setting, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 41(6) (2021), 7373-7386.
[15] C. X. Fan, E. Fan, J. Ye, The cosine measure of single-valued neutrosophic multisets for multiple attribute decision-making, Symmetry, 10(5) (2018), 154-166.
[16] J. P. Fan, H. Zhang, M. Q. Won, Dynamic multi-attribute decision-making based on interval-valued picture fuzzy geometric heronian mean operators, IEEE Access, 10 (2022), 12070-12083.
[17] L. Fei, Y. Deng, Y. Hu, DS-VIKOR: A new multi-criteria decision-making method for supplier selection, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 21 (2019), 157-175.
[18] K. Hu, J. Ye, E. Fan, S. Shen, L. Huang, J. Pi, A novel object tracking algorithm by fusing color and depth information based on single valued neutrosophic cross-entropy, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 32(3) (2017), 1775-1786.
[19] H. Jiang, J. Zhan, D. Chen, PROMETHEE II method based on variable precision fuzzy rough sets with fuzzy neighborhoods, Artificial Intelligence Review, 54 (2021), 1281-1319.
[20] M. G. Kendall, Rank correlation methods, Fourth ed., Charles Griffin and Co., London, 1970.
[21] M. J. Khan, W. Kumam, N. A. Alresidi, Divergence measures for circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 116 (2022), 1-12.
[22] M. J. Khan, P. Kumam, W. Kumam, Theoretical justifications for the empirically successful VIKOR approach to multi-criteria decision making, Soft Computing, 25 (2021), 7761-7767.
[23] S. Kullback, R. A. Leibler, On information and sufficiency, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 22(1) (1951), 79-86.
[24] K. Kumar, H. Garg, Connection number of set pair analysis based TOPSIS method on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to decision making, Applied Intelligence, 48 (2018), 2112-2119.
[25] G. F. Kutlu, C. Kahraman, A novel VIKOR method using spherical fuzzy sets and its application to warehouse site selection, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 37(1) (2019), 1197-1211.
[26] D. Liang, Y. Zhang, Z. Xu, A. Jamaldeen, Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR approaches based on TODIM for evaluating internet banking web site quality of Ghanaian banking industry, Applied Soft Computing Journal, 78 (2019), 583-594.
[27] H. C. Liao, Z. S. Xu, A VIKOR-based method for hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 12 (2013), 373-392.
[28] J. Lin, Divergence measures based on Shannon entropy, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 37(1) (1991), 145-151.
[29] M. Lin, Z. Chen, Z. S. Xu, X. Gou, F. Herrera, Score function based on concentration degree for probabilistic linguistic term sets: An application to TOPSIS and VIKOR, Information Science, 551 (2021), 270-290.
[30] M. Lin, H. Wang, Z. S. Xu, TODIM-based multi-criteria decision-making method with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, Artificial Intelligence Review, 53 (2020), 3647-3671.
[31] X. Luo, X. Wang, Extended VIKOR method for intuitionistic fuzzy multiattribute decision-making based on a new distance measure, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2017 (2017), 1-16.
[32] A. R. Mishra, P. Rani, Multi-criteria healthcare waste disposal location selection based on Fermatean fuzzy WASPAS method, Complex and Intelligent Systems, 7 (2021), 2469-2484.
[33] S. Miyamoto, Fuzzy multisets and their generalizations, In: Calude C.S., P˘Aun G., Rozenberg G., Salomaa A., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, (eds) Multiset Processing. WMC 2000., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2235 (2001), 225-235.
[34] O. Mohsen, N. Fereshteh, An extended VIKOR method based on entropy measure for the failuremodes risk assess-ment { A case study of the geothermal power plant(GPP), Safety Science, 92 (2017), 160-172.
[35] M. U. Molla, B. C. Giri, P. Biswas, Extended PROMETHEE method with Pythagorean fuzzy sets for medical diagnosis problems, Soft Computing, 25 (2021), 4503-4512.
[36] S. Opricovic, Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems, Faculty of Civil Engineering, (1998), PhD Thesis, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade.
[37] S. Opricovic, Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10) (2011), 12983-12990.
[38] S. Opricovic, G. H. Tzeng, Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2) (2004), 445-455.
[39] S. Opricovic, G. H. Tzeng, Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods, European Journal of Operational Research, 178(2) (2007), 514-529.
[40] S. Pramanik, P. P. Dey, F. Smarandache, J. Ye, Cross entropy measures of bipolar and interval bipolar neutrosophic sets and their application for multi-attribute decision-making, Axioms, 7(2) (2018), 21-45.
[41] M. Qiyas, M. A. Khan, S. Khan, S. Abdullah, Concept of Yager operators with the picture fuzzy set environment and its application to emergency program selection, International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics, 13(4) (2020), 455-483.
[42] P. Rani, A. R. Mishra, Fermatean fuzzy Einstein aggregation operators-based MULTIMOORA method for electric vehicle charging station selection, Expert Systems with Application, 182 (2021), 1-23.
[43] P. Rani, A. R. Mishra, K. R. Pardasani, A. Mardani, H. Liao, D. Streimikiene, A novel VIKOR approach based on entropy and divergence measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets to evaluate renewable energy technologies in India, Journal of Cleaner Production, 238 (2019), 1-17.
[44] C. Rao, M. Gao, J. Wen, M. Goh, Multi-attribute group decision making method with dual comprehensive clouds under information environment of dual uncertain Z-numbers, Information Sciences, 602 (2022), 106-122.
[45] M. Riaz, S. T. Tehrim, A robust extension of VIKOR method for bipolar fuzzy sets using connection numbers of SPA theory based metric spaces, Artificial Intelligence Review, 54 (2021), 561-591.
[46] K. Rogulj, J. K. Pamukovic, M. Ivic, Hybrid MCDM based on VIKOR and cross entropy under rough neutrosophic set theory, Mathematics, 9(12) (2021), 1334-1360.
[47] S. Salimian, S. M. Mousavi, A multi-criteria decision-making model with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets for evaluating digital technology strategies in COVID-19 pandemic under uncertainty, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, (2022). DOI: 10.1007/s13369-022-07168-8.
[48] M. K. Saraji, D. Streimikiene, G. L. Kyriakopoulos, Fermatean fuzzy CRITIC-COPRAS method for evaluating the challenges to industry 4.0 adoption for a sustainable digital transformation, Sustainability, 13(17) (2021), 9577-9596.
[49] B. Sarkar, A. Biswas, A multi-criteria decision making approach for strategy formulation using Pythagorean fuzzy logic, Expert System with Applications, 39(1) (2022), 1-23.
[50] X. G. Shang, W. S. Jiang, A note on fuzzy information measures, Pattern Recognition Letters, 18(5) (1997), 425-432. [51] C. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication, The Bell System Technical Journal, 27 (1948), 379-423. [52] C. Spearman, The proof and measurement of association between two things, The American Journal of Psychology, 100(3/4) (1987), 441-471.
[53] Taruna, H. D. Arora, P. Tiwari, A new parametric generalized exponential entropy measure on intuitionistic vague sets, International Journal of Information Technology, 13 (2021), 1375-1380.
[54] V. Torra, Hesitant fuzzy sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25(6) (2010), 529-539.
[55] E. T¨urkarslan, J. Ye, M. ¨Unver, M. Olgun, Consistency fuzzy sets and a cosine similarity measure in fuzzy multiset setting and application to medical diagnosis, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021 (2021), 1-9.
[56] M. ¨Unver, M. Olgun, H. Garg, An information measure based extended VIKOR method in intuitionistic fuzzy valued neutrosophic value setting for multi-criteria group decision making, Scientia Iranica, (2022). DOI: 10.24200/SCI.2022.60039.6562.
[57] X.Wang, E. Triantaphyllou, Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods, Omega, 36(1) (2008), 45-63.
[58] Y.Wang, X. K.Wang, J. Q.Wang, Cloud service reliability assessment approach based on multi-valued neutrosophic cross-entropy and entropy measures, Filomat, 32(8) (2018), 2793-2812.
[59] G. Wei, Picture fuzzy cross entropy for multiple attibute decision making problems, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(4) (2016), 491-502.
[60] L.Wu, H. Gao, C.Wei, VIKOR method for financing risk assessment of rural tourism projects under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment, Information Science, 37(2) (2019), 2001-2008.
[61] Z. S. Xu, M. M. Xia, Hesitant fuzzy entropy and cross-entropy and their use in multiattribute decision-making, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 27(9) (2012), 799-822.
[62] R. R. Yager, On the theory of bags, International Journal of General Systems, 13(1) (1986), 23-37.
[63] J. Yang, Y. Yao, X. Zhang, A model of three-way approximation of intuitionistic fuzzy set, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 13 (2022), 163-174.
[64] J. Ye, Improved cross entropy measures of single valued neutrosophic sets and interval neutrosophic sets and their multicriteria decision making methods, Cybernetics and Information Technologies, 15(4) (2015), 13-26.
[65] J. Ye, J. Song, S. Du, Correlation coefficients of consistency neutrosophic sets regarding neutrosophic multi-valued sets and their multi-attribute decision-making method, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 24 (2022), 925-932.
[66] J. Ye, E. T¨urkarslan, M. ¨Unver, M. Olgun, Algebraic and Einstein weighted operators of neutrosophic enthalpy values for multi-criteria decision making in neutrosophic multi-valued set settings, Granular Computing, 7(5) (2022), 479-487.
[67] Z. L. Yue, C. Yue, X. H. Peng, W.Wu, VIKOR-based group decision-making method for software quality assessment, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20(1) (2023), 53-70.
[68] L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Information and Control, 8(3) (1965), 338-353. [69] L. A. Zadeh, Probability measures of fuzzy events, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 23(2) (1968), 421-427. [70] L. A. Zadeh, The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I, Information Science, 8(3) (1975), 199-249.
[71] M. Zeeshan, M. Khan, Complex fuzzy sets with applications in decision-making, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 19(4) (2022), 147-163.
[72] Q. S. Zhang, H. Y. Xing, F. C. Liu, J. Ye, P. Tang, Some new entropy measures for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on distances and their relationships with similarity and inclusion measures, Information Science, 283 (2014), 55-69.
[73] X. Zhao, Z. Tang, S. Yang, Extended VIKOR method based on cross-entropy for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multiple criteria group decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 25(4) (2013), 1053-1066.
[74] F. Zhou, T. Y. Chen, An extended Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR method with risk preference and a novel generalized distance measure for multicriteria decision-making problems, Neural Computing and Applications, 33 (2021), 11821- 11844.
[75] L. Zhou, S. Wan, J. Dong, A Fermatean fuzzy ELECTRE method for multi-criteria group decision-making, Informatica, 33(1) (2021), 181-224.
[76] B. Zlaugotne, L. Zihare, L. Balode, A. Kalnbalkite, A. Khabdullin, D. Blumberga, Multi-criteria decision analysis methods comparison, Environmental and Climate Technologies, 24(1) (2020), 454-471. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 346 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 488 |