پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 830 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,967 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 14,693,862 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,483,356 |
The Development of Collaborative Course Design Questionnaire: A Measure of Students’ Attitudes towards Collaborative Course Design and Barriers to its Implementation | ||
| Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies | ||
| دوره 17، شماره 1، خرداد 2025، صفحه 115-140 اصل مقاله (735.74 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22111/ijals.2024.48183.2433 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Bahroz Mawlood* ؛ Mahdi Hasanpour Ghaleh؛ Zahra Dolati؛ Amir Mahdavi Zafarqandi | ||
| Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This research aims to develop a questionnaire that measures students’ attitudes toward collaborative course design and identifies any barriers that might hinder student participation in course design. The questionnaire was developed in four phases. First, an item pool was created based on experts’ opinions, relevant literature, and the researchers’ experience. Second, the items were classified into two main sections: “attitudes” and “barriers”, with the latter further divided into five subcategories (social and cultural, educational and institutional, individual, practical, and attitudinal). The content validity of the questionnaire was assessed, with all items and subcategories achieving CVR>0.59 and CVI>0.79, thus surpassing the minimum required threshold. Third, the questionnaire was piloted with 330 students. The construct validity of the Collaborative Course Design Questionnaire (CCDQ) was confirmed through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) as the extraction method, along with Varimax rotation, which identified six factors explaining 71.536% of the variance in the data. Finally, Cronbach’s alpha was calculated, yielding reliability indices ranging from 0.971 to 0.627, indicating internal consistency and reliability of the items within each construct. The findings suggest that the Collaborative Course Design Questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument suitable for use with senior high school students. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| barriers؛ collaborative course design؛ scale development؛ senior high school students؛ student attitudes | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C. K., & Walker, D. A. (2019). Introduction to research in education (10th edition. Student). Cengage.
Anghelache, V. (2013). Determinant factors of students’ attitudes toward learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 478-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.223
Aronowitz, S. (1994). A different perspective on educational equality. Review of Education, Pedagogy and Cultural studies, 16(2), 135-151.
Barratt, C. C., Parrott, J., & Presley, E. (2011). The polyphonic classroom: A collaborative pedagogical approach to information literacy and digital composition. Collaborative Approaches to the Digital in English Studies, 51-221.
Bovill, C. (2020). Co-creation in learning and teaching: The case for a whole-class approach in higher education. Higher Education, 79, 1023-1037. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734019-00453-w
Bovill, C., & Bulley, C. J. (2011). A model of active student participation in curriculum design: Exploring desirability and possibility. In C. Rust (ed.), Improving student learning (ISL) 18: Global theories and local practices: Institutional, disciplinary and cultural variations (pp. 176-188). Oxford Brookes University Center for Staff and Learning Development.
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Developers, 16(2), 133-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2011.568690
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student-staff partnerships. Higher Education, 17(2), 195-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4
Brunk-Chavez, B., & Miller, S. J. (2007). Decentered, disconnected, and digitized: The importance of shared space. Kairos: Rhetoric, Technology, Pedagogy, 11(2).
Bryson, C., Furlonger, R., & Rinaldo-Langridge, F. (2015). A critical consideration of, and research agenda for, the approach of ‘students as partners’. Paper presentation, International Conference on Improving University Teaching, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Bulger, M. E., Murphy J. C., Scheible, J., & Lagresa, E. (2011). Interdisciplinary knowledge work: Digital textual analysis tools and their collaborative affordances. Collaborative Approaches to the Digital in English Studies, 252-278.
Cohen, R., & Mule, L. (2019). Collaborative pedagogy in a design thinking education course. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching. 14.29-42. http://dxdoi.org/10.46504/14201902ma.
Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2005). An on-going journey: Technology as a learning workbench. http://doc.utwente.nl/50888/1/rede_Collis_Moonen.pdf
Combs, S. D., Frost, E. A., & Elbe, M. F. (2015). Collaborative course design in scientific writing: Experimentation and productive failure. Composition Studies, 43(2), 132-149.
Cook-Sather, A. (2008). What you get is looking in a mirror, only better: Inviting students to reflect (on) college teaching. Reflective Practice, 9(4), 473-483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623940802431465
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. Jossey Bass.
Delpish, A., Darby, A., Holmes, A., Knight-McKenna, M., Mihans, R., King, C., & Felten, P. (2010). Equalizing student voices: Student-faculty partnership in course design. Engaging student voices in the study of teaching and learning. Stylus Publishing.
Demarrais, K., Roulston, K., & Copple, J. (2024). Qualitative research design and methods: An introduction. Myers Education Press.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. McGraw-Hill.
Dunne, E. (2016). Design thinking: A framework for student engagement? A personal view. Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.21100/jeipc.v2i1.317
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS. SAGE.
Furlong, A. & Cartmel, F. (2009). Higher education and social justice. SHRE and Open University Press.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1974). Factor analysis. Saunders.
Greenwald, A. G. (2014). Why attitudes are important: Defining attitude and attitude theory 20 years later. In Pratkanis A. R., Breckler S. J., Greenwald A. G. (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 429–440). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Griffin, B. W. (2009). Cronbach’s Alpha (measure of internal consistency). EDUR 9131 Advanced Educational Research, 15, 2011.
Grudens-Schuck, N. (2003). No beginners: Teaching participation at the graduate level. PLA notes, 48(12), 11-14.
Handelzalts, A. (2009). Collaborative curriculum development in teacher design teams [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Twente.
Hanna-Benson, C., Kroeze, S., Gandhi, R., Haffie, T., & Wahl, L. M. (2020). Students as partners in collaborative course design and educational research. International Journal for Students as Partners, 4(2), 61-8stu0.
Hess, G. (2008). Collaborative course design: Not my course, not their course, but our course. Washburn Law Journal, 47(2), 367-387.
Hutchings, P. (2005). Building pedagogical intelligence. Carnegie Perspectives. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. https://cseweb.ucsd.edu/classes/wi05/cse141/pedagogy.pdf
Jafar, A. (2016). Student engagement, accountability, and empowerment: A case study of collaborative course design. Teaching Sociology, 44(3), 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X16644489
Kane, R.G., & Chimwayange, C. (2014). Teacher action research and student voice: Making sense of learning in secondary school. Action Research, 12(1), 52-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/147650313515282
Kim, A.S.N., Jennings, B., Tolomei, E., Schiafone C., & Dafoe L. (2022). Involving students as partners in a course redesign. Imagining SoTL, 2(2), 36-51.
Könings, D., Mordang, S., Frank, M., Laurents, S. (2020). Learner involvement in the co-creation of teaching and learning: AMEE Guide No. 138. Medical Teacher. 43.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1838464.
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Martens, E., Meeuwissen, S., Dolmans D., Bovill C., & Konings K. (2019). Student participation in the design of learning and teaching: Disentangling the terminology and approaches. Medical Teacher, 41(10), 1203–1205. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1615610
McCulloch, A. (2009). The student as co-producer: Learning from public administration about the student-university relationship. Studies in Higher Education, 34(2), 171-183.
Mead, L. (2018). Faculty perspectives of student-faculty collaborative course design. Teaching and Learning in Communication Sciences & Disorders, 2. https://doi.org/10.30707/TLCSD2.1Mead
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, C., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1), 1–23.
Mihans, R. J., Long, D., & Felten, P. (2008). Power and expertise: Student-faculty collaboration in course design and the scholarship of teaching and learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2008.020216
Neff, J., Potts, L., & Whithaus, C. (2012). Collaborative methodologies for new media research: Using grounded theory and contextual inquiry. Collaborative approaches to the digital in English studies, 11-43.
Nemoto, T., & Beglar, D. (2014). Likert-scale questionnaires. In JALT 2013 conference proceedings, 1-8.
Nihuka, K.A. (2019). Impact of collaborative course design on instructors’ practices and students’ academic outcomes. In J. Pieters, J. Voogt, N. Pareja Roblin (eds.) Collaborative Curriculum Design for Sustainable Innovation and Teacher Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20062-6_14
Owen, J., & Wasiuk, C. (2021). An agile approach to co-creation of the curriculum. International Journal for Students as Partners, 5(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i2.4475
Roen, D.H., & Mittan, R.K. (1992). Collaborative scholarship in composition. In G. Kirsch & P. A. Sullivan (eds.). Research Methods and Methodology (pp. 287-313). Illinois University Press.
Shayegan Far, M. A. (2023). An evaluation of Iranian EFL university instructors’ attitudes toward critical pedagogy in online education [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. University of Guilan, Iran.
Shor, I. (1992). Empowering education. University of Chicago Press.
Steward, M., Cohn, J., Whithaus, C. (2016). Collaborative course design and communities of practice: Strategies for adaptable course shells in hybrid and online writing. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching & Learning Journal, 9(1), 1-20.
Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of personality assessment, 80(1), 99-103.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. Harper & Row.
Waltz, C. F., & Bausell, R. B. (1981). Nursing research: Design, statistics, and computer analysis. FA Davis Company.
Wilkinson, M., & Scandrett, E. (2003). A popular education approach to tackling environmental injustice and widening participation. Concept, 13(1), 11–16.
Yancey, K. B., & Spooner, M. (1998). A single good mind: Collaboration, cooperation, and the writing self. College Composition and Communication, 49(1), 45-62. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 429 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 146 |
||